1989
Taylor Swift is currently the biggest pop star in the world. It goes beyond her record-breaking albums, the scale of her world economy-boosting Eras Tour, gossip about her love life or even her household name status — in 2023, familiarity with the 34-year-old singer-songwriter’s lyrics, whereabouts and condiment choices is almost required for carrying a knowledgeable conversation about pop culture.
Explore
Explore
See latest videos, charts and news
See latest videos, charts and news
That’s why, as the years go by, it gets harder to believe that Swift didn’t start her career in pop music. And while the Pennsylvania-born musician has always demonstrated mainstream sensibilities and mass appeal, country was an identity she eagerly embodied for several albums as she rose to stardom — from the cowboy boots she paired with every outfit to the now-faded southern accent she picked up after moving with her family to the genre’s Mecca, Nashville Tennessee, when she was barely a teenager.
She started flirting with pop sonics in the early 2010s, when she was still in a committed relationship with country but had already been pulling pop star numbers with mainstream-level crossover hits. In the same year she won Entertainer of the Year at the 2012 Academy of Country Music Awards, she dropped the EDM-influenced “I Knew You Were Trouble” and sang about dressing up like “hipsters” on the sparkly earworm “22,” simultaneously accumulating radio and chart recognition in both country and pop.
[embedded content]
But come 1989, her crush on pop had become a full-blown love affair, for which she chose to publicly and amicably break up with country music indefinitely. “For the record, this is my very first documented, official pop album,” she said while announcing the project atop the Empire State Building in a livestream hosted by Yahoo. Later, she explained to Billboard, “I followed my gut instinct and tried not to think about how hard it would be to break it to country radio… I didn’t want to break anyone’s heart.”
From top to bottom, 1989 was unflinchingly pop, inspired heavily by the shimmering grandeur of ‘80s top 40 hits. Collaborators included some of the mainstream’s hugest producers — Max Martin, Shellback, Ryan Tedder — and gone was any trace of fiddle, twangy guitar or mention of the word “y’all.”
Also gone were any of the commercial benchmarks Swift had previously set for herself – 1989 blew them out of the water. Following its release on Oct. 27, 2014, the album spent 11 weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard 200, became Swift’s first LP to produce multiple Billboard Hot 100 No. 1 hits – “Shake It Off,” “Blank Space” and “Bad Blood” with Kendrick Lamar – and debuted with 1.287 million copies sold in its first week, the highest of her career thus far (the album was not initially made available on streaming). Her departure from country would go down as one of the single greatest business moves in the modern music industry, one that only continues to pay off for the supernova; nearly a decade later, the origins of Swift’s current status as cultural overlord can still be traced back to the overwhelming success of 1989.
But how exactly did Swift achieve a crossover that didn’t just meet expectations, but exceed them beyond belief? In speaking on that topic with pop and country radio experts and veteran Swifties, one word comes up a lot: authenticity.
This story is part of Billboard’s Genre Now package, highlighting the artists pushing their musical genres forward — and even creating their own new ones.
“People sort of expected that this [would be] a natural transition for her,” remembers Audacy’s Erik Bradley, a Chicago pop radio brand manager and music director. “Her realness just helped make it that much easier. Her personality and her demeanor, it just all feels that it came together perfectly for a smooth transition. You have to be authentic [to cross over successfully]. And she is that.”
“[Swift’s] approach felt like, ‘How can we do this? What do I need to improve? Do you like this?’” agrees SiriusXM + Pandora’s vp of music programming Alex Tear, noting the singer-songwriter’s humility as a newcomer to the format. “When you have that kind of dialogue and you’re open-minded and your ego allows it, you can start to shape exactly what you need to elevate to the levels she’s elevated to. She listened.”
Essentially, Swift’s genre leap made fans out of naysayers who may have speculated that the star simply wanted to gain more money or fame by crossing over. She approached 1989 with a genuine love, appreciation and studiousness for the genre that you can hear in the album’s 13 songs – which were embraced by critics, industry heads and fans alike.
“The music was just so superior,” says Bradley. “That resonated. People were playing multiple songs because all of them were so undeniable. ‘Style,’ ‘Blank Space’ and ‘Shake it Off’ were on the radio at the same time, which is not easy, for top 40 to be playing that many songs [from one album] at one time.”
[embedded content]
Swift was also smart enough to know that, though her lyricism already made her special in any contemporary music space, she needed to bring something fresh to the pop landscape if she wanted to stand out. It wouldn’t have been enough to merely sing “Out of the Woods” over a beat borrowed from the EDM or R&B-infused tracks that were dominating the charts at the time. She also had to fill a space not yet occupied by fellow mid-2010s hitmakers like Ariana Grande, Meghan Trainor, Drake or Pharrell.
That’s where those star producers, as well as an on-the-rise Jack Antonoff, came in, assisting Swift in finding a specific blend of breezy, forward-moving sounds accented by synths and programmed drums that was entirely her own. Working with some of the biggest names in mainstream music on 1989 was another solid calculation on Swift’s part, as it gave her foray into pop “a lot of credibility,” says 25-year-old Swift expert and pop culture podcaster Brooke Uhlenhop.
“She’s already established as such a great artist that people could trust that she knew what she was doing,” continued Uhlenhop, who’s been a fan since Swift’s debut era around 2006. “When she finally made that jump, people were like, ‘Oh, okay. This is really good.’ I think 1989 was more of a representation of her true self than she was letting people know before.”
It likely helped that Swift was upfront about the change from the beginning of 1989’s album cycle. She didn’t necessarily have to vocalize that she was going pop, and could’ve just let the music speak for itself, but making a direct statement clarifying 1989’s influences made her switch-up a cultural moment in and of itself. It had admirers and casual observers paying attention before the record even came out, keen to see if Swift could pull it off.
“I really liked that, the honesty of ‘Here’s what it’s going to be,’” recalls 25-year-old Pulitzer-winner and Swiftie Kristine White, who recalls sneaking into her elementary school’s computer lab to watch videos of the star. “There were so many people when I was in high school who first became Swifties because of 1989, because they weren’t country fans. If she’d kept easing into that transition, I don’t think she would’ve gained that huge following that she did.”
Swift also went out of her way to distinguish her public image as being different from the Taylors of the past, from chopping off her famous blonde locks to moving out of Tennessee into a glamorous apartment in lower Manhattan. For the first time, she also incorporated specific items into the iconography of her album – seagulls, paper airplane necklaces, Polaroid photos – to further solidify and commodify her new identity in pop.
“She completely reinvented herself,” adds White. “She went to New York. She cut off her hair. She was always with her big [#Squad] girlfriend group. She had a completely different style. Everything about herself was completely new, saying, ‘No, I’m really moving forward. You’re not going to see those country ringlet curls anymore.’”
Bradley agrees – 1989 was the full package, as an album and era. “She and her team made all the right moves,” says the radio executive. “Everything was very well executed. Aesthetics, videos, press, television appearances. It just felt like everything connected, everything felt right.”
That’s not to say she completely deserted her old self, though. She still went to great lengths to remind her OG Swifties that she was “still just a girl like I am,” says White, touching on Swift’s interactions with fans on Tumblr, her inaugural Secret Session listening parties and maintaining beloved traditions like the coded messages in her lyric booklets. “Keeping that authenticity really helped keep the older fans.”
[embedded content]
Swift also wisely courted the people that counted in pop without “giving the finger to country music,” as put by country radio consultant and former Max Media operations manager John Shomby, who met Swift when she was 16. “She stayed true to herself and knew who her friends were in the business and stayed close to them, but also respected everybody else and did not push back when there was pushback on her.”
“Here’s what’s really refreshing: Taylor Swift was available,” remembers Tear from the pop side. “She traveled, she did the miles, she met everyone, she had such in-depth relationships that people became cheerleaders. One of the key formulas was visiting the programmers that push the buttons. Then, they feel part of the movement.”
This story is part of Billboard’s Genre Now package, highlighting the artists pushing their musical genres forward — and even creating their own new ones.
A decade later, Swift has only exponentially expanded what she started with 1989, which remains just as popular today. Just as she ended 2014 with 1989 at No. 1 on the Billboard 200, she recently sailed into 2024 with her re-recorded 1989 (Taylor’s Version) again at the top of the chart, logging even higher first-week sales numbers than she did the first time around (1.359 million in traditional sales, to be exact). And in between both iterations, she continued to do what worked for her in the first coming of 1989 — trying out different genres on projects like the folk-tinged Folklore and Evermore and staying curious, hungry, humble, savvy and yes, authentic.
For instance, Shomby still maintains a relationship with Swift and her team, even though it’s been a decade since his industry coincided with hers.
“Last time I saw her was three years ago when she was here at Nissan Stadium [in 2019], and I went back to see her. My wife and daughter were not there and the first thing she said was, ‘Where are my girls?’” he recalls with a smile you can hear over the phone. “I’m one of those people, anybody who criticizes Taylor, I’ll pull them aside and say, ‘Let me tell you about her.’
“You feel like you’re the only person in the room when she talks to you,” he adds. “That’s a rarity — especially in our business, especially on the pop side.”
Taylor Swift‘s 2014 album 1989 was her most commercially successful at the time, and nine years later, 1989 (Taylor’s Version) was just as popular with the Swifties. Among her From the Vault tracks, one in particular has stood out among fans on TikTok — the scathing “Is It Over Now?”
“Is It Over Now? (Taylor’s Version) [From the Vault]” launched at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 songs chart. The track is from Swift’s newest rerecorded album, 1989 (Taylor’s Version), which blasted in atop the Billboard 200, becoming her 13th No. 1 set, extending her mark for the most among women.
If you need a guide to follow along with Taylor Swift’s “Is It Over Now? (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault),” find the lyrics below.Once the flight had flownWith the wilt of the roseI slept all aloneYou still wouldn’t go
Let’s fast forward to three hundred takeout coffees laterI see your profile and your smile on unsuspecting waitersYou dream of my mouth before it called you a lying traitorYou search in every maiden’s bed for something greater
Baby, was it overWhen she laid down on your couch?Was it over when he unbuttoned my blouse?“Come here,” I whispered in your earIn your dream as you passed out, babyWas it over then?And is it over now?
When you lost controlRed blood, white snowBlue dress on a boatYour new girl is my clone
And did you think I didn’t see you?There were flashing lightsAt least I had the decencyTo keep my nights out of sightOnly rumors ’bout my hips and thighsAnd my whispered sighsOh, Lord, I think about Jumping off of very tall somethingsJust to see you come runningAnd say the one thing I’ve been wantingBut no
Let’s fast forward to three hundred awkward blind dates laterIf she’s got blue eyes, I will surmise that you’ll probably date herYou dream of my mouth before it called you a lying traitorYou search in every model’s bed for something greater
Baby, was it overWhen she laid down on your couch?Was it over when he unbuttoned my blouse?“Come here,” I whispered in your earIn your dream as you passed out, babyWas it over then?And is it over now?
Think I didn’t see you?There were flashing lightsAt least I had the decencyTo keep my nights out of sightOnly rumors ’bout my hips and thighsAnd my whispered sighsOh, Lord, I think about Jumping off of very tall somethingsJust to see you come runningAnd say the one thing I’ve been wantingBut no
(Flashing lights, oh, Lord) Let’s fast forward to three hundred takeout coffees later(Flashing lights) I was hoping you’d be thereAnd say the one thing (oh, Lord) I’ve been wanting (oh, Lord)But no
Lyrics licensed & provided by LyricFind
Lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
Written by: Jack Michael Antonoff, Taylor Alison Swift
Upon its Oct. 27 release, Taylor Swift’s 1989 (Taylor’s Version) quickly eroded both sales and streams of the original 2014 version released by Big Machine Records.
In the week Swift released her album of 1989 re-recordings, the original 1989 had 21,000 album equivalent units (AEUs) — down 43.6% from the previous week and down 36.9% from the trailing 12-week average, according to Billboard analysis of Luminate data for the United States. That was a deeper first-week decline than the previous two times Swift released re-recordings. The original Red lost 38% of its AEUs — a metric that combines physical and digital album sales, track sales and streams — the week Red (Taylor’s Version) was released in November 2021. The original Speak Now dropped 40% the week that Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) came out this past July.
On-demand audio streams for the original 1989 declined 56.4% while track sales — a smaller component of 1989’s total consumption — fell 67.8%. Video streams declined 56.4% and programmed streams (from non-interactive internet radio services such as Pandora) dropped 23.6%. At the same time, 1989 (Taylor’s Version) amassed over 375.49 million on-demand streams — compared with just 27.8 million total on-demand streams for the original over the same period.
The Taylor’s Version series of re-recordings stemmed from Swift’s outrage that her catalog had been acquired by Scooter Braun’s Ithaca Holdings in 2019. News that Braun took ownership of her catalog brought her back to “the incessant, manipulative bullying I’ve received at [Braun’s] hands for years,” she wrote at the time. “Now Scooter has stripped me of my life’s work, that I wasn’t given an opportunity to buy,” she continued. By the end of that year, Swift was talking about recording new versions so her music “could live on,” she told Billboard in a December 2019 interview. “I do want it to be in movies, I do want it to be in commercials. But I only want that if I own it.”
Swift released her first album of re-recordings, for the 2008 album Fearless, in April 2021, and licensed the lead-off single, “Love Story,” to a Match.com television ad. The track debuted at No. 1 on the Hot Country Songs chart and No. 11 on the Hot 100 in February 2021. Fearless (Taylor’s Version) debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 albums chart with 291,000 AEUs.
With each new Taylor’s Version, Swift changes the playbook on how an artist can repackage previously released material for a growing legion of diehard fans. While it’s remarkable that Swift’s album releases have become pop culture moments unto themselves, each new wave of re-recordings carries large business and financial implications, too. If 1989 (Taylor’s Version) performs like its predecessors, the re-recordings will crowd out the original version and further erode the value of the Big Machine original catalog that Shamrock Holdings paid a reported $300 million to acquire in 2020.
Surprisingly, while Swift collectors scooped up 1.36 million units of the 1989 (Taylor’s Version) album — it has five versions on vinyl, eight versions on CD and two versions on cassette — consumers still purchased about 1,000 units of the 1989 album in physical or digital formats during the same period.
Expect more of the same in the coming weeks. If 1989 (Taylor’s Version) follows the trends of the two most recent Taylor’s Version albums that came before it, the original 1989 will lose close to half or more than half of its weekly AEUs. Average weekly consumption of the original Red dropped 40% in the 12 weeks following the release of Red (Taylor’s Version). The original Speak Now lost 59% of its average weekly consumption in the 12 weeks after its counterpart was released.
The lone bright spot for the original 1989 was radio: U.S. airplay spins from the original recordings jumped 57.4% last week. Combined with airplay of the Taylor’s Version recordings, U.S. spins rose an astounding 157.4%. The catch, however, is that recordings do not earn royalties from broadcast radio performances in the United States. As a result, the original recordings’ owner, Shamrock Holdings, benefits only from the promotional value of those radio spins. Swift, however — along with various co-writers and publishing companies — earns publishing royalties when either version of 1989 recordings are played at radio.
One of the most popular albums in the United States, Taylor Swift’s 1989, is about to lose significant market share to a newer version, Swift’s re-recorded 1989 (Taylor’s Version).
It’s happened three times before. 1989 (Taylor’s Version), a re-recorded and expanded version of the nine-times platinum 2014 album, with five previously unreleased tracks, follows the insanely successful formula of the three preceding albums: Fearless, Red and Speak Now. If 1989 (Taylor’s Version) enjoys the same trajectory as its predecessors, the Big Machine-era version of 1989 will lose a majority of its weekly consumption and forever get crowded out by the more popular, Swift-endorsed re-recordings.
To understand what could happen to 1989, consider its predecessor, Red. Average weekly consumption of Red — measured in equivalent album units, which combines physical and digital album sales, track sales and streams — dropped 40% in the 12 weeks following the release of Red (Taylor’s Version), according to Billboard’s analysis of Luminate data for the United States. The original version of Speak Now took an even bigger hit, losing 59% of its average weekly consumption in the 12 weeks after the re-recordings were released. Given those two trajectories, the original version of 1989 could very well lose half its average weekly consumption.
Consumption of the original 1989, which includes Hot 100 chart-toppers “Shake It Off” and “Bad Blood,” has soared this year as Swift reached a Michael Jackson-level of media coverage. As Swift Mania heated up, thanks to her record-setting Eras Tour and steady output of new and rerecorded material, 1989’s average weekly album equivalent units (AEUs) climbed from 16,000 in January to 29,000 in May to 39,000 in August, peaking at 46,000 in the week ended Aug. 17. On the latest Billboard 200 albums chart, the original 1989 ranked No. 20 — one spot behind Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) and two spots ahead of Reputation, Swift’s final album for Big Machine.
That has been great news for Shamrock Holdings, which acquired Swift’s Big Machine master recordings in 2020 for a reported $300 million. In the year before Shamrock Holdings acquired Swift’s catalog, 1989 averaged about 10,000 AEUs per week — 70% below the current level. While Swift’s previous three albums of re-recordings ate into the Big Machine originals, 1989 was spared and got to benefit from Swift’s success — that is, until she got around to releasing her Taylor’s Version.
The original version of 1989 — Swift’s best-selling album to date — has more to lose than its predecessors: 1989 has averaged 33,000 equivalent album units over the previous 12 weeks, nearly 1.8 times more consumption than the 19,000 AEUs Speak Now averaged in the 12 weeks before Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) was released. The original versions of Fearless and Red had even less consumption in the 12 weeks before Swift’s re-recordings came out: 7,000 AEUs for Fearless and 9,000 AEUs for Red.
If 1989’s weekly AEUs drop by 50%, Billboard estimates the gross sales from purchases and streams will drop by nearly $120,000 per week — equal to more than $6 million per year. That’s gross sales, not wholesale. Shamrock pockets less than wholesale after paying royalties, distribution and manufacturing.
And if 1989 (Taylor’s Version) performs like the other three albums of re-recordings, it will far outperform Swift’s Big Machine originals. Through the first 41 weeks of 2023, the re-recordings of Fearless and Red have respectively averaged 4.8 times and 4.1 times the weekly consumption of the original albums. Speak Now (Taylor’s Version), which has just 14 weeks of sales history since its July release, currently has 5.3 times the average weekly consumption of the original.
The original version of Reputation also has a lot to lose. In the past 12 weeks, Reputation has averaged 27,000 AEUs per week. And just as 1989 consumption skyrocketed this year, Reputation’s weekly AEUs have more than doubled since January. Shamrock Holdings will enjoy those spoils, too — that is, until Reputation (Taylor’s Version) inevitably arrives.
Taylor Swift is continuing the rollout for 1989 (Taylor’s Version), which is set to release on Oct. 27, and the star announced on Wednesday (Sept. 13) that an exclusive bonus track will be available on the tangerine edition of the vinyl. Explore Explore See latest videos, charts and news See latest videos, charts and news […]
1989 (Taylor’s Version) is the gift that keeps on giving. Taylor Swift revealed another limited edition vinyl colorway via Instagram on Monday (Aug. 21), this time a soft aquamarine green color. Similar to the yellow “Sunrise Boulevard” vinyl she announced last week, Swift’s newest vinyl will be available to pre-order for just 48 hours on Swift’s […]
Taylor Swift is just months away from unveiling her 1989 (Taylor’s Version) album, and the star is getting fans excited with a new vinyl release. A yellow “Sunrise Boulevard” vinyl is available to pre-order for just 48 hours on Swift’s website here. In addition to the vinyl, the purchase includes collectible album jacket and sleeves, […]
Let the speculation begin! Taylor Swift fans believe the pop superstar is dropping some major Easter eggs about her next re-recorded album following the surprise release of her “I Can See You” music video.
During her Eras Tour concert in Kansas City, Mo., on Friday (July 7), the 33-year-old singer delighted Swifties by sharing the action-packed visual for her newly released Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) “From the Vault” track “I Can See You,” starring actors Taylor Lautner, Joey King and Presley Cash.
Written and directed by Swift, the five-minute video finds the songstress and her co-stars pulling off a heist to recover the master recording of her third album. Toward the end of the clip, as the foursome makes their escape in a white fan, they drive across a bridge with a sign that reads “1989 TV.” This has led many to believe that a re-recording of her 2014 album, 1989, could be on the horizon.
“1989 TAYLOR’S VERSION IS NEXT. Easter eggs in the ‘I Can See You’ music video confirms it,” one fan tweeted alongside screenshots from the video.
Other eagle-eyed Swifties have pointed out that the “I Can See You” video features similar imagery to various 1989 visuals, including a close-up of the singer’s bright red lips from her “Style” video and action sequences from the “Bad Blood” video.
During Friday’s show at Geha Field at Arrowhead Stadium, Swift invited Lautner, King and Cash onstage to help introduce the “I Can See You” clip. Lautner delighted the sold-out audience by cartwheeling and backflipping onto the stage.
“WELL. SO. I’ve been counting down for months and finally the ‘I Can See You’ video is out,” Swift tweeted alongside behind-the-scenes photos the visual. “I wrote this video treatment over a year ago and really wanted to play out symbolically how it’s felt for me to have the fans helping me reclaim my music.”
Speak Now (Taylor’s Version), the newly released re-recording of Swift’s 2010 album, arrived on Friday (July 7). The new set features all of the original recordings, plus six “From the Vault” tracks.
See more fan reactions to Swift’s “I Can See You” on social media below.
everyones yelling about the 1989 tv sign, meanwhile WHY IS THE BLINKING OF THE LIGHT SO WEIRDLY TIMED?!?!? WHAT IS SHE TRYING TO TELL US?!!? pic.twitter.com/FCIJNlbHWF— bean (taylor’s version) ft. hayley williams (@speaknowbean) July 8, 2023
Ok hear me out, remember how Taylor used to be super active during 1989 era?? And post about all the July 4th parties?? And after so long she’s finally done it again. And there are Polaroids with her besties… So like what if we’re slowly entering the 1989 TV era??? pic.twitter.com/8GWQMzZCPx— Skylar ♡ || Obsessed with electric touch || (@SapphireGleam) July 7, 2023
taylor lautner in a speak now tv music video today, harry styles on a 1989 tv vault track tomorrow— kourtney ♡ (@KourtneyWorley) July 8, 2023
there are exactly 1,468 lines on the wall which corresponds with the number of days since taylor last performed a 1989 song, 1989 tv is coming🩵 pic.twitter.com/CpJAgefdDq— astrid WILL GET ERAS TOUR TICKETS (@hxuntedtv) July 8, 2023
My conspiracy is that these photos are also from the 1989 tv cover shoot bc her hair and lipstick are suspiciously close to the og 1989 cover pic.twitter.com/Lvd5PKvjgh— zoe ✨ eras tour LA 8/5 + 8/8 💙 (@adorkablyswift) July 7, 2023
-
Pages