The “Voter Code of Conduct” Includes These Three Cardinal Rules:
“Voters shall not allow their choices to be suggested, directed or influenced by anything other than their own analysis of merit, including, but not limited to: personal friendships, company loyalties, regional preferences, or sales volume/popularity.
“Voters shall not accept money or anything of value in exchange for votes, access to other members (member lists and contact information are confidential), submission of materials for Grammy consideration, or any other privilege of Recording Academy membership.
“Voters shall not enter into any agreements or understandings on how to vote. This includes without limitation: ‘Voting Blocs,’ or groups of voters who agree to vote together. Such groups may include but are not limited to: voters affiliated with a particular record label or management company, or voters linked through social media. ‘Vote Trading,’ or offering to vote in any manner in exchange for another’s vote.”
Analysis: That first rule – to disregard “personal friendships, company loyalties, regional preferences, or sales volume/popularity” and focus on the work itself – has been a Grammy perennial at least since the 1970s (when I started seeing it) and probably since the Academy was founded. It’s an excellent rule, but a hard one to follow.


0 comments