Music

Rancid’s Tim Armstrong Reunites With Operation Ivy Bandmate in Bad Optix

Operation Ivy fans rejoice! The legendary late 1980s Berkeley, California ska punk band featuring Rancid singer/guitarist Tim Armstrong and singer Jesse Michaels is partially reunited on the debut single from Armstrong and Michaels’ new band, Bad Optix.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Their easy skanking first track, “Raid,” dropped on Wednesday (March 29) and it features the former bandmates trading off vocals on a track about looking for distraction in a time of anxiety and confusion. “Rethrone a crown with their hands made of stone / New crew got oil in our bones / Good things perish on the road to the castle,” Armstrong sings in his signature dead-set vocal style over a bubbling ska arrangement.

“RAID/ Hit them where they live, where they kill, where they bury/ RAID/ We won’t step in line for the party secretary,” the group gang up on the anti-authoritarian song’s urgent chorus. The band featuring Circle Jerks/The Bronx drummer Joey Castillo and Trash Talk bassist Spencer Pollard share a writing and production credit on the song, which will kick off the new Hellcat Single Club.

The Club will roll out a series of releases by a number of as-yet-unnamed bands curated by Armstrong and the Hellcat squad.

“’Raid’ is about every person’s spiritual autonomy from the powers that be, regardless of who they are or what their particular struggle is,” Michaels said in a statement about the rockstady song. “Like many of the tracks we have worked on, I heard the music and wrote the lyrics very quickly, almost on the spot. This was only the second song we did but it felt hot immediately and just flowed so we thought it would be a good way to introduce the new band to the world.”

According to the statement, the group formed in March 2021 and Michaels said despite the more than three-decade gap between the 1989 dissolution of the short-lived Op Ivy and the formation of Optix, his creative connection with Armstrong has only gotten stronger. The band was birthed when Michaels and Armstrong reconnected to hang out and Armstrong played his old friend some tracks he’d been working on.

“As soon as we started writing together, we found that we had the same collaborative energy that we had in the past, so it was natural and fun just to keep going,” Michaels said of the immediate lyrical/vocal inspiration he felt. “It came back, just like that. Like when we were kids,” Armstrong added. “There is a special chemistry between us and I don’t take it for granted.”

Armstrong and Michaels performed together for only the second time in 33 years last February to play the Op Ivy song “Sound System” at the Musack Charity Concert in Los Angeles.

Armstrong nodded to his long association with Michaels in an Instagram post, writing that they’ve been friends since they were teens in the early 1980s. “We formed Operation Ivy in 1987 and 2 years later we broke up. Jesse and I both continued down our own musical journeys through the years,” he said. “I always felt a little sadness that Jesse and I stoped making music together. But we never lost touch. And then it happened. A few years ago we started writing songs again! A couple of the songs ended up on Grade 2’s record. Jesse and I just stared writing again a lot. It came back. Just like that. Like when we we were kids. There is a special chemistry between us and I don’t take it for granted.”

Armstrong also had high praise for Castillo, who he called “one of the best drummers in the world and a dear friend,” and Pollard, who he met a few years ago when Castillo brought Trash Talk to record at Armstrong’s studio. “The rhythm section of Joey and Spencer is as good as it gets and their respected styled has added another element to the song writing,” he wrote.

In an Instagram Story, Michaels elaborated on the inspiration for Bad Optix and what’s to come, writing, “It’s funny how life happens because I had been sort of thinking about anything and everything besides doing music at that time but that’s the way it always works. Anyway, we kept writing songs over the last year and we have more to share, which we will do over the coming months.” He also teased some live shows (“eventually”), but said for now they’re just taking things slowly and having fun.

While “Raid” has a vibe that fits with both men’s musical lane, Michaels promised that they’ve also written “a lot of punk stuff and some stuff that is hard to even categorize. Really excited about this project and hope you guys dig it,” he wrote.

Listen to “Raid” and see Armstrong’s post below.

The Cure’s Robert Smith Demands Explanation From Ticketmaster For ‘Weird, Over Priced’ ‘Face Value’ Ticket Fees

Robert Smith still hasn’t found a permanent cure for Ticketmaster’s ill-priced fees. After blasting the company earlier this month for applying exceptionally costly service charges to ticket sales for The Cure‘s upcoming tour, the frontman is now calling out the entertainment giant once again.

This time, the issue comes with the discovery of some tickets labeled by Ticketmaster as being “face value” in spite of the fact that they cost a lot more money than a standard ticket normally would, much less one supposedly charging a minimum amount. “I AM ASKING ABOUT THE WEIRD OVER PRICED ‘FACE VALUE’ TICKETS THAT ARE POPPING UP HERE AND THERE… X,” Smith tweeted on Tuesday (March 28).

For reference, one fan commented on the guitarist’s tweet with a screenshot of two “face value” tickets that cost nearly $1,400. “That’s nuts,” someone else replied to the fan. “I gave almost the same seat for Toronto and paid $160. In USD, that’s around $115!!!”

On Ticketmaster’s website, the face value ticket exchange is defined as “an artist-driven marketplace where fans can sell their tickets to other fans at face value.”

As the band gears up for its first trek in seven years, The Lost World North American Tour, The Cure had hoped to keep seat-buying fair and simple for their fans by opting out of dynamic pricing and shielding against scalpers with non-transferable tickets. But when the sale opened mid-March, customers were disappointed to find that the Ticketmaster had tacked on sky-high fees to tickets that totaled more than the price of the actual tickets themselves.

Afterward, Smith went on a similarly all-caps Twitter rant, writing that he was “AS SICKENED AS YOU ALL ARE BY TODAY’S TICKETMASTER ‘FEES’ DEBACLE” before promising to investigate what went wrong. Soon after, he took to social media again to announce that Ticketmaster would be offering refunds and lower fees.

See Smith’s tweet below.

Behind the Music of ‘Up Here,’ Hulu’s First Musical Show

Hulu wasn’t explicitly looking to develop a musical comedy when songwriters Bobby Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez, writer Steven Levenson, and director Thomas Kail presented them with Up Here. The platform hadn’t ever done a musical TV show — which, despite well-received past series like Glee, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and Schmigadoon remains a relative rarity in the current streaming world.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

But, as head of scripted content at Hulu Originals Jordan Helman remembers it, it was hard to resist this “who’s-who of the heavy hitters of Broadway in the past decade.” Kail is the Tony-winning director of Hamilton (and now Sweeney Todd); Levenson the Tony-winning playwright behind Dear Evan Hansen; and Lopez and Anderson-Lopez the Academy Award-, Emmy- and Grammy-winning married duo behind the music of Frozen, Frozen 2 and Coco (Bobby, who co-created The Book of Mormon and Avenue Q, is also a double EGOT winner).

Kristen Anderson-Lopez and Robert Lopez

Kristen Anderson-Lopez and Robert Lopez

Sarah Shatz/Hulu

Up Here is based on a musical of the same name by Anderson-Lopez and Lopez, produced in 2015 at the La Jolla Playhouse. The story of Miguel and Lindsay (portrayed by Carlos Valdes and Mae Whitman) finding themselves, and romance, in New York City in the 1990s — while battling the naysaying voices of their subconsciouses, personified onscreen — was, Helman says, an “irresistible” opportunity for Hulu to enter the musical landscape. Its audiences have responded positively to female-driven soaps and thrillers in the past, but “we had never really approached [a show] through a rom-com lens,” Helman continues. “This felt like a tailored opportunity to broaden the aperture of what we do, but still feeling deeply relevant to the viewers we have on platform.”

For Lopez and Anderson-Lopez, developing Up Here for TV was also an enticing opportunity to expand upon and rethink their original show — which dwelt on the male protagonist’s subconscious. It was freeing as well, allowing them to explore multiple genres in their songwriting. And with each episode functioning like a mini-musical — complete with elaborate singing and dance numbers — they were able to see a much larger than usual quantity of their compositions make it to the final product (those songs can also be heard on the show’s soundtrack, recently released on Hollywood Records).

“We’re from Broadway,” says Bobby. “And we wanted to bring what was great about Broadway musicals and see if we could do our version of it in a streaming series.” Below, he and Anderson-Lopez speak to Billboard about precisely how they did it.

After the production of Up Here at La Jolla, what did you hope its future would be?

Kristen Anderson-Lopez: La Jolla was a huge growth experience. We’d never done book, music and lyrics all together before … while raising two children out of town … and getting infested with bird mites. [Laughs.] That’s a thing that happened! We realized that where we are in our lives, we wanted to work with book writers [going forward]. You can’t address what you need to in production, on all three fronts, overnight, every day. So, we’d started to talk to talk to book writers and had actually identified Steven Levenson as someone with their finger on the pulse of what we wanted to do.

Then life took over: Frozen Broadway, Frozen 2, Coco. There was an Excel spreadsheet somewhere that said we could do nothing else for four years. [Laughs.] So it got put away. But there was always this intention of revisiting it with Steven at some date in the future. And then that date came in 2020 when Tommy Kail called us and said, “Hey, I’d like to do something with you guys on TV” — and we’d fallen in love with Fosse/Verdon [the FX series that Kail directed]. If there’s a president and vice president of the Fosse/Verdon fan club, it’s us.

Bobby Lopez: The production in La Jolla was very different from what we ended up with on Hulu — in that it only really entered the guy’s head, and one of the takeaways was, “Gee, I wish we’d written it so you could see what she’s thinking, too.” We couldn’t imagine rewriting it for the stage in a way that would preserve any of what we had. So, we were a little frustrated.

But when the idea of television came into it — doing a half-hour comedy, where every week we had the structure to write a mini-musical in essence, and end up with 8 mini musicals adding up to a larger grand musical [over a season] — we got very excited. It just seemed like, “This is a new take on the idea, we’ll be able to tell a different story, we’ll be able to change the characters in exciting ways.”

'Up Here'

‘Up Here’

Patrick Harbron/Hulu

Did you preserve anything from the original stage show?

Kristen: I’d say the thing that’s preserved is the concept and question of: Can you ever truly know someone? And what does it feel like when a relationship that you assume is, “This is my person” — they become a stranger? And how you realize you’re up against the bubble of your own consciousness.

Bobby: Some of the songs about that theme carried over. For instance, the idea of “I Can Never Know You” — that was a song in the original, and we transformed it into a different song called “Please Like Me” for the show.

Kristen: “Please Like Me” was originally kind of a “I’m Just a Girl Who Cain’t Say No” charm song — an introduction to the female lead — and now it’s about the huge problem she’s battling. I think it probably always was. And we were always curious to see if you could have a song that’s so clearly, “This person needs to grow from this.” But it’s also why you identify with her, because she’s so honest about it.

Even in the expanded streaming world, musical television shows still feel pretty few and far between. Why do you think that is?

Kristen: I can tell you, after doing it for the last three years — it’s very, very difficult to do. TV is always hard to do. It’s always about getting it ready as much as you can, then you have to get lightning in a bottle on the film day, then you have to piece it together. If you add the elements of learning music and choreography, producing music, to something already time-constrained… you’ve added weights to what’s already hard.

Bobby: I think we sold this show on the first pitch, to [co-chairman of Disney Entertaiment] Dana Walden. And they were very excited — we all were — and then we realized the process of developing a TV show. A lot of the writing is done during production, whereas musical theater is very iterative as a process: You write a draft of the whole thing, you have to see it in front of an audience to know whether it’s working. And it’s the same in animation, honestly – we screen the first version of the film, and then kind of throw it all out, and at the end of many iterations we have something we know works and we produce that.

TV is much more accelerated. It took a lot of time before we were greenlit, rethinking the concept of who these characters were. It was a high degree of difficulty to not only have these singing characters, but also the concept of being inside their minds.

What are the specific challenges inherent in making an episodic musical, as opposed to one in film or onstage that’s over in about two hours?

Kristen: Every musical has an architectural scaffold to it: You have your opening, your “I want” song, your charm song, your act break, your finale, your 11:00 number. [For a show] you really want to know what the whole is before you start making the parts.

We really had to think architecturally [with this show] as we were breaking the story – toggling between what it is to break a normal streaming comedy and to break a musical. There’s a little bit of a Russian doll aspect: In order to have the whole series, we needed to have a giant overview and know where the key songs were going to be before you could ever film. And then you need to record all those songs. Everything has to be pretty solid before a single actor has ever stood on a soundstage, because the songs get pre-recorded.

Bobby: Which is the opposite of how we usually work. In theater, the cast album is the last thing. In animation, you kind of record as you go. It’s never the very first thing — like, “Hi Mae, I’m Bobby, this is Kristen! Now, if you step inside the booth, let’s record the first song.”

Kristen: I will say, I have never been part of a TV writers’ room, and I absolutely loved it. It was kind of like eight hours of group therapy every day. It’s just really creative people pretending, basically.

You get to play with musical genre so much from episode to episode. Did that feel like a freeing new direction?

Kristen: It was liberating. We could jump all over – you could have a Fiona Apple[-type] song next to a Katrina and the Waves song next to a weird eight-bit mini opera.

Bobby: The original show was vast — it was meant to be like a British mega-musical, it had a big orchestra, it wanted to sound gigantic. This version, we really went small with it, trying to think of it all as one rock band playing the music. Getting to work with the same players every day, it felt like we were making an album, rather than hiring players to be in the orchestra pit. It felt unified by its small, intimate sound.

Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez

Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez

Sarah Shatz/Hulu

What was the casting process like? Both Mae and Carlos are great singers, but they’re not huge, over-the-top Broadway voices.

Kristen: At its heart we wanted this to feel like an extraordinary story about ordinary people – so we didn’t want them to be larger than life. We wanted to find those people we’ve seen – or not seen – who really seem like you could see them on the street. They could [ordinarily] be the sidekick on a show, but this is a chance for the sidekicks to be the lead.

Mae brings with her such a beautiful humility; she does feel like, to me, your little sister. She’s so relatable and just lets you see all her emotions. And Carlos … we put poor Carlos through the wringer. He came in five times, because what he had to do was extraordinary. He had to be able to have these intimate scenes, but also dance up a storm and sing and really show us what’s underneath the toxic masculinity, and bare his soul. And he always rose to the occasion.

Bobby: We were 100% behind them vocally. They both have experience singing, and for what they needed to do in this, they really were rock stars. Not to mention the chemistry they have that just sparked.

Kristen: Mae likes to say she’s not a singer — but I spent years raising my kids on her Tinker Bell! She’s an amazing singer.

Bobby: One of my first gigs, I wrote a song on spec for The Jungle Book 2, and if it had gotten selected, Mae would have been the singer. I think she was 10.

Kristen: And Carlos was in Darren Criss’ band at University of Michigan. He went to this hardcore, triple-threat high school that was like the FAME high school of Atlanta — and then he got into Michigan for musical theater, which is like, where you go to become a Broadway star.

You also have big Broadway stars on the show, like Norm Lewis and Brian Stokes Mitchell — but it seems like you’re having fun casting them against type.

Bobby: There’s always a bunch of people we’re dying to work with and haven’t yet, and this was a great opportunity to. Scott Porter, we’d seen in Altar Boyz a long time ago and knew he was an amazing singer and dancer, so to get him onboard was incredible. Brian Stokes Mitchell and Norm Lewis are baritone titans of Broadway.

Kristen: To talk about Stokes for a second: To bring him in to do a hip-hop Dr. Seuss character, to show this side of him that’s so funny – we knew we needed a really charismatic, attractive silver fox. But then he just had this bead on this character that was so funny, and the ability to really commit that teeters on the absurd. And across the board, that’s what we got with all these Broadway performers. Nobody’s afraid of going toward the stylized, so everyone just committed hard to these big emotions in such wonderful, quirky ways.

Musicals, both on stage and in animated form, go through years of workshopping and development, and so much gets left on the cutting room floor. Up Here on the other hand seems to have a much higher quantity of songs – was that liberating?

Kristen: Yeah! Frozen, we wrote 26 songs and 7 got into the movie. Whereas here we wrote 25 songs and 21 are in the show. Although I will say, if you count La Jolla as part of that development process, the math falls apart there.

Bobby: Then it’s like 75 songs. [Laughs.] But yeah — we did toss a few numbers, but we didn’t have the luxury of doing a lot of cutting and rewriting. We killed ourselves making 21 brand new songs in a row, and having to mix and master and produce tracks that you love, it’s a great deal of work. Now, when we listen to the soundtrack, it does play like a cast recording – it feels like a Broadway show, and that’s what we wanted.

Skrillex to Play 5-Hour Set at Red Rocks Amphitheatre

Skrillex is taking the rumble to the Rockies. On Wednesday (March 29) he announced a show at Colorado’s famed Red Rocks Amphitheatre that will happen next month.

The set, going down on Saturday, April 29, will feature Skrillex playing a five-hour set from 7 p.m. until midnight, local time. This format emulates his show last month at Madison Square Garden, where he — along with co-headliners Fred again.. and Four Tet — played for five hours, from 7 p.m. to midnight ET.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Tickets for the Red Rocks show go on sale this Friday (March 31) at 12 p.m. ET.

This show announcement comes in the wake of the release of a pair of Skrillex albums, Quest For Fire on Feb. 17 and Don’t Get Too Close, which was surprise released the following day, Feb. 18. Skrillex has not announced a full tour behind these albums, instead opting to play prestige venues like MSG and Red Rocks, along with a hefty list of summer festivals: Something In The Water, Hangout, Movement and Elements, plus a series of European events including Primavera in Barcelona and EXIT in Serbia. This Euro run also includes a show at Ibiza’s influential techno mecca DC10.

Quest For Fire is currently sitting at No. 11 on Dance/Electronic albums, where it peaked at No. 2 upon release and is currently its fifth week on the chart. Album singles “Rumble” and RATATATA” are currently at No. 20 and No. 18 on the chart, respectively. Skrillex also appear on this same chart for “Baby again,” his recently released earworm single with Fred again.. and Four Tet.

Skrillex red rocks

Courtesy Photo

Coi Leray’s ‘Players’ Deconstructed: Hits Honoring the ’80s Are on the Rise

As previously reported, Coi Leray lands her first Billboard Hot 100 top 10, as “Players” jumps to No. 9 on the April 1-dated chart.

Here’s a look at the sonic and lyrical elements that have helped the song surge, as well as a notable trend that “Players” furthers among recent hip-hop hits.

Overt Retro 1980s Influence

Over the past decade, hip-hop songs with an overt retro 1980s influence have been few and far between, with only three making it into the Hot 100’s top 10 from 2013 to 2021:

  • Eminem’s “Berzerk” (No. 3 peak, 2013)
  • Rae Sremmurd’s “Black Beatles,” featuring Gucci Mane (No. 1 for seven weeks, 2016-17)
  • Post Malone’s “Congratulations,” featuring Quavo (No. 8, 2017)

In contrast, over just the past year, three overt retro ’80s-driven songs have hit the Hot 100’s top 10:

  • Latto’s “Big Energy” (No. 3, April 2022)
  • Nicki Minaj’s “Super Freaky Girl” (No. 1, one week, August 2022)
  • Coi Leray’s “Players” (No. 9, to-date, April 2023)

Honoring the Past

Notably, all three such Hot 100 top 10s over the past year revisit, and reinvent, classic hits from the early ’80s:

  • “Big Energy”: samples Tom Tom Club’s “Genius of Love” (a No. 31 Hot 100 hit in 1982)
  • “Super Freaky Girl”: samples Rick James’ “Super Freak” (No. 16, 1981)
  • “Players”: samples Grandmaster Flash & the Furious Five’s “The Message” (No. 62, 1982)

The above three originals also hit Nos. 2, 3 and 4, respectively, on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart in 1981-82.

What’s Common, and Uncommon, Among Current Hits

Digging deeper into these three most recent ’80s-influenced hip-hop hits, they share the following key commonalities, which are in line with newer hip-hop top 10s on the Hot 100:

  • The songs feature a combination of sung and rapped vocals.
  • They possess two verses and three choruses each.
  • All have their choruses preceding the first verse, a quality more popular in hip-hop than in pop.

In addition, the songs also share qualities that are less common in hip-hop, helping distinguish them while still fitting in among other hits. In addition to their ’80s sample-driven melodies:

  • They feature solo female lead vocals.
  • All feature a pre-chorus, which is uncommon among hip-hop top 10s.

‘Girls Is Players, Too’

Further, “Players” further stands out for its female empowerment lyrical theme, which is highly uncommon among recent Hot 100 top 10s.

David and Yael Penn are the co-founders of Hit Songs Deconstructed, which provides compositional analytics for top 10 Billboard Hot 100 hits. In 2022, Hit Songs Deconstructed and fellow song analysis platform MyPart partnered to launch ChartCipher, a new platform analyzing hit songs, as defined by Billboard‘s charts.

Larry June & The Alchemist Talk Bringing the Coasts Together on Joint Album ‘The Great Escape’: ‘Put It Next to All the Other High-Level S–t and Let It Compete’

“Deviated leather and it’s 911, bend the corner, I’m on Haynes Street coppin’ a windbreaker,” raps Larry June in the opening line of The Great Escape. For June and his partner-in-crime, The Alchemist, this isn’t just an album but an experience. June’s effortless flow, combined with Al’s signature beats, creates a sonic journey that transports you all over the globe. This 15-track project showcases June’s ability to blend his laid-back, introspective lyrics seamlessly with the producer’s eclectic, sample-heavy sound.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

It’s a partly sunny day in New York City, and the duo has come to Billboard headquarters to preview their highly anticipated collaboration. Interestingly, when June visited the offices back in 2017, he was considering quitting rap. Now, the tides have shifted, and the West Coast rhyme slinger is one of the genre’s most beloved acts. As The Great Escape is finally set to release this Friday (March 31), fans have been eagerly anticipating its arrival. The stakes are high, with some of the biggest names in rap (Big Sean, Action Bronson, Joey Bada$$ and more) slated to dish out heat on the duo’s hotly anticipated effort. 

“I was challenged on a lot of the beats,” says June of the experience. “It was like a different bag when I was working with Al. You’re thinking Mobb Deep. You’re thinking all that. It’s a different bar.”

Following the release of his latest album, 2022’s Spaceships on the Blade, the San Francisco native earned praise for his ability to flawlessly blend different styles and create a truly unique sound. June’s penchant for classic funk and melodic ad libs place him in a rarefied position in hip-hop, as listeners from both coasts lean to him for late-night cruising music. And this project feels like a perfect match with The Alchemist – who’s been producing classics for over 20 years — by his side. 

“He’s fun to work with, and super-easy,” the producer says of his new full-album collaborator. “I work with a lot of different artists, and Larry is kind of how his music is. He’s positive and excited about s–t when he’s doing it.”

There’s a buzz of excitement as June and Alchemist walk inside the legendary Ludlow House with some of the most prominent tastemakers in the music industry in attendance, including journalists Brian ‘B.Dot’ Miller and Sway Calloway, former NBA players Richard Jefferson and Al Harrington, and artists such as Trinidad James and Joey Bada$$. Later that night, Jermaine Dupri and Action Bronson join the festive soiree as they look to support their fellow comrades on their release. With drinks flowing and music blasting, it’s clear that Larry June and The Alchemist have delivered an early album-of-the-year contender.

“I don’t want this to be like a slept-on record, or it gets just credibility — we need to push this s–t on,” says Alchemist. “Put it up next to all the other s–t that’s out there on the high level and let it compete.”

Below, Billboard speaks to June and Alchemist about their new album, The Great Escape, recording the album in different parts of the world, their favorite features and more.

You guys recorded in a couple of different locations like Malibu and Mexico City. What was the thought process behind that? 

Larry June: We just were traveling through that s–t. We kind of was hanging out a lot and it was coming together. I had some s–t to do in Mexico City. We shot a video, got a little work done. We really were listening to beats in different places. We would get to locations to listen to beats, nice ocean views and s–t — I’ll think of something, and I’ll take it to the house and record. Or I might do a little here and there. It’s just vibin’ for real.

Alchemist: It’s a different energy.

Larry June: Different energy. That’s all it was.

Alchemist: I’m always in a dark room with no clocks. In the studio, it’s like a f–king casino, you know what I’m saying? I know I can work good there, but I felt like, especially for this s–t, it was like, “Let’s get some different scenery. Let’s just go bug out. Go to Malibu and get on a studio crib.” So, we were kind of just picking different spots. Plus, [June] cooks anywhere. You know what I’m saying? He doesn’t really need a studio, he never did, so for me, it was cool to grab the machine and bring some disks and let’s go over there and start a record. 

Your chemistry is strong together. It feels like this is your fifth project. Was that just something that kind of came about? Were y’all friends before this?

Larry June: Nah, man. We just became good friends in the process. I was a fan, you know what I’m saying? We got together. He was cool as hell. S–t, we just started kicking it. I started coming to the studio every day. I don’t even go to studios like that. I was listening in the studio every day, just listening to the beats. Smoked, ordered food.

I know, in music, there’s a lot of egos involved and sometimes, things don’t work out the way you know you kind of want to. Why don’t you guys have a problem collaborating with others? 

Larry June: S–t, it’s the colliding of the sounds that is dope. I mean, you can work with people who are actually dope and you can come together and build something powerful, then why not? And I f–k with producers and a lot of rappers too, but mainly producers. I really f–k with the producers. I did s–t with Sledgren. Cardo. Harry Fraud. [Alchemist] was on my list. Like, “I’ve got to get to Alchemist.” We got the same barber and s–t. I’m like, “Tell this n—a Alchemist, ‘It’s time, man.’” It took like a year, [but] it finally happened.

The Alchemist: I think too, it’s like, being secure. Some guys, the ego thing is likely to compensate — but when you’re really secure and you feel good about what you do, you’re not afraid. I’m going to reach out to anybody. And I noticed that about him too. Some guys you work with, they go, “Let’s send a verse to somebody. Let’s send a record.” And then it doesn’t come in two days. “Nah, man. He doesn’t get it.”

It was never like that with him, ever. He was all positive — even if something didn’t come through or not, I’ve never seen him put out his chest like that, like most rappers at some point do. But to me, that means he’s secure. He’s full of confidence. He knows he’s that dude. That’s how it works.

Larry June: That’s why I didn’t do features for a long time. A lot of people didn’t really understand what I was doing for a long time, so I had to put out multiple projects and go hit the ground and go build my s–t hand-to-hand. Now everybody is like, “Oh, s–t. Larry. We f–ked with the brand.” You’ve got to really try and build it. You’ve got to go hit the streets. So, I’m a hustler first. I was outside f–king around, getting my bread, and I just put that back into the music. Did the same hustle. Hand to hand, you know what I’m saying? Ground patrol, really f–king with the people and s–t. You know what I mean? It becomes undeniable where you have to f–k with it.

You both have great ears production wise – it’s high-level. Where did you kind of develop that?

Larry June: Man, I made beats first, but I fell off. So, I understand just the sounds of making it. So, when I hear a beat, I’m thinking about what can I add to the beat as if I was an instrument. It has to sound good on this.

We did eight bars on “60 Days.” I thought the beat was riding was so hard. I could have played the beat without no vocals on it anyway — just played that, sliding down the PCH. I don’t want to rap when it’s too long. Let me just say a couple of bars, sprinkle it on there and keep it rocking. Some of the beats, I would probably have just played with nothing on there. I’d just be talking on them motherf–kers. Something to slide to. That’s probably why I like working with producers, man — because I understand what a producer does.

Alchemist: I got a good theory about what you were talking about. Where he got that ear? I think a lot has to do with the music that you were around as a kid, that your parents listened to. Any time I’m working with artists, and once I start figuring out their bag of sound they like — when I start talking to them about the s–t their parents listened to in the house, it’s literally similar. I don’t even know, but I’m sure your pops and mama were listening to some good music.

Larry June: Yeah, my mom used to play that Musiq Soulchild.

Alchemist: Subconsciously. It just attracts you, because it’s so normal and you’re hearing it. Like even me, whenever that stuff that my pops used to listen to. He used to listen to, like, bossa nova. He would listen to weird rock groups. ABBA. Perez Prado.

Larry June: I listened to a lot of neo-soul growing up. I remember my mama playing it in the crib, over and over. Jill Scott and all of that. The same melodies, for sure. Subconsciously. Donell Jones and all that. I loved the melodies.

Knowing how this project sounds sonically, Larry, do you now have an elevated taste when it comes to production on who you want to collaborate with next after working with Al?

Larry June: For sure. I’m just paying attention to the details a little more — like, lyrically. It has opened up a whole new bag for me. S–t, I’m still building. [Al’s] legendary. I’m still building, trying to make people believe in my sound — so, dope, for sure.

I think it helped though — like I said, helped me rap better […] I feel like I did it perfectly for what it was, and the next one’s going to be even harder. This was the hard part. Now, we’ve got a bag. Even the “60 Days” joint. That was the last one we did. We did that s–t quick. It was just easy, you kind of figured the bag out already.

But even before, working with Al we spoke about this: You’ve gained respect on both coasts, not just the West. You sold out Irving Plaza in NYC your last tour. The respect is there.

Larry June: For sure, and I’m going to continue to do that. But I feel like, with this one, it was just more like — the real hip-hop fans, the real day ones. You know what I mean? Born in ’91. Not old heads, but it can be younger people too. Like, we were in the studio with Earl [Sweatshirt]. They are dissecting everything. “Oh, rewind that, he said what?” It’s like there was pressure on you, like, “Oh nah, them not bars.”

But I just stopped thinking about that part. I just started talking about my s–t. “Deviated leather and it’s 911, bend the corner, I’m on Haynes Street coppin’ a windbreaker…” You know what I’m saying? I’m just saying, f–k it.

The Alchemist: I love that line.

Larry June: I’m just going to go ahead and just give you what I did. I stopped thinking too much. I was thinking too much.

Alchemist: But I was there to keep checks and balances. That line, exactly, was why I wanted to start. That’s the first song. That the first line that comes on. “Deviated leather and it’s 911, bend the corner, I’m on Haynes Street coppin’ a windbreaker…” That’s how you start an album. F–k what the beat sounds like. That image was like, “D–n.” Because I’m big on the first thing that you hear — presentation is everything to me. So, I felt like, “D–n, if we can get them that image in the first two bars, that’s it.”

The opening bar sets the tempo.

Larry June: You know what I learned on this project? No matter what or who you rap with, the people want you to be you. So, I just stay in my bag, no matter what. Even if it’s not the most complex bars. They’re here to hear Larry June. It worked out smooth. He made me comfortable.

George Michael’s ‘Careless Whisper’ Music Video Joins Billion Views Club on YouTube

Just like time, a billion views probably can’t mend the careless whispers of a good friend — but it’s still a pretty major milestone. The music video for George Michael‘s iconic 1984 hit “Careless Whisper” recently surpassed the momentous view count, thanks to the help of hundreds of thousands of average views per day.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Though the video was uploaded to YouTube in 2009 and first created two decades prior to that — the clip is seriously a time capsule of the mid-80s — it still reaches an average audience of more than 400,000 global views each day. It stars Michael — looking glam in gold earrings, a suit and his trademark poofy hair — serenading the camera as he reflects on clips of him cheating on his significant other. There’s vintage swimwear, sailboats and Miami sunsets, a perfectly dramatic backdrop for the pop star to profess his regret over an affair.

The ballad, which was credited to “George Michael” or “Wham! featuring George Michael” depending on the country of release, served as Michael’s pivot away from Wham! into an extremely successful solo career. Thanks in part to its instantly recognizable featured saxophone solo, “Careless Whisper” remains one of the musician’s most well-known songs of all time, spending three weeks atop the Billboard Hot 100 in ’84 and ’85. Only “Faith” has surpassed that chart reign, having clocked four weeks at No. 1 in 1987; “One More Try” also spent three weeks in the prime spot in 1988.

The two-time Grammy winner passed away in 2016, but not before sharing one last project with the world: his autobiographical documentary, Freedom. Of his legendary, decades-long career, Michel professed in the doc that he hoped to be remembered as “one of those last kind of big pop stars, in a sense that there was a certain glamour to it.”

“But really, it’s just the songs, and I hope that people think of me as someone who had some kind of integrity,” he continued at the time, jokingly adding: “Very unlikely.” 

Watch George Michael’s billion-times-viewed music video for “Careless Whisper” above.

Reba McEntire Gushes Over Her Love of Aretha Franklin, Sings ‘Respect’ With Jennifer Hudson

Like Jennifer Hudson, country icon Reba McEntire counts herself as a major Aretha Franklin fan — so much so, that the 68-year-old gushed over how much she loves Franklin during the Tuesday (March 28) episode of The Jennifer Hudson Show.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

“You covered Aretha Franklin’s ‘Respect’ in 1980?,” Hudson asked the country star, who sang Franklin’s signature hit at the 1988 CMA Awards. “How did that come about?”

McEntire said the answer was simple, “I like the song. I love the song, I love Aretha.” The three-time Grammy winner also shared an anecdote about an encounter she had with the late Queen of Soul. “I got to meet her, she scared me to death, I wouldn’t even go up to talk to her,” McEntire said, with the American Idol alum adding, “Yeah that scared me too… I got to meet her in Washington, D.C. at Christmas in Washington, and she’s just amazing.”

The pair then paid tribute to their love and respect for Aretha in the most appropriate way — by covering Franklin’s signature 1967 single, “Respect.”

“What you want, baby, I got it/ What you need, do you know I got it?/ All I want you to do for me, is show me some respect when you get home/ Hey, baby/ Give it to me/ Hey baby,” McEntire kicked off the track, with Hudson providing an assist with some ad libbed vocals backgrounds.

Hudson then hopped on the second verse with ease — unsurprisingly, considering she played Franklin in the 2021 biopic, Respect. “I ain’t gon’ do you wrong while you’re gone/ Ain’t gon’ do you wrong ’cause I don’t wanna/ All I’m askin’ is for a little respect when you come home/ Baby/ When you get home/ Yeah,” she sang.

Watch McEntire and Hudson duet “Respect” in the video above.

5 Ways a TikTok Ban Might Affect the Billboard Charts

With national security concerns over TikTok, owned by Chinese tech company ByteDance, leading to U.S. officials debating a national ban of the service — with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy saying this week that lawmakers would be “moving forward with legislation” — the music industry is left contemplating a landscape without the generationally popular and influential app. The implications of such a ban would be widespread across the business: upending countless marketing and promotion plans, if not entire label departments, and affecting the reach of nearly every major artist, whether long-established or up-and-coming.

The impact on the Billboard charts would also be massive. While TikTok plays are not included in Billboard chart calculations, the exposure granted by viral success on the app has helped launch scores of chart hits over the past half-decade, while also allowing next-gen artists like Lil Nas X and Doja Cat a platform to help establish their personalities and images and cultivate their fanbases, cementing their stardom in the process. In terms of chart repercussions, a ban on TikTok in 2023 would be something like a ban on MTV in 1985 — its removal might not directly affect any metrics, but the lingering reverberations would still be seismic.

Here are five ways the loss of TikTok might most acutely be felt on the Billboard charts — assuming it would take some time for a potential rival app to replace its position of influence and importance within the industry — with particular focus on our flagship songs chart, the Billboard Hot 100.

1. Fewer older songs becoming new hits. One of the most consequential trends in 2020s chart pop has been the preponderance of catalog entries infusing all levels of the Hot 100 — whether in extreme examples like Kate Bush‘s Stranger Things-re-launched 1985 single “Running Up That Hill (A Deal With God)” reaching the top five in 2022, or subtler cases like Chris Brown‘s 2019 Indigo Deluxe Edition cut “Under the Influence” becoming a 2023 top 20 hit. One thing nearly all these revived hits have in common is TikTok: Whether its newfound popularity was initially reignited there (as with “Influence”), or whether gasoline was poured on the already-existing flame (as with “Hill”), these hits would never have reached the velocity needed to break out as they did without the app.

If TikTok disappeared, it’s possible we’d still see some of these new-old hits — particularly ones like “Hill,” which have the benefit of a major pop culture phenomenon to rally their revival — but we’d almost certainly see far fewer of the “Influence” sort, without a platform for them to unexpectedly catch fire and organically grow into contemporary favorites. And while radio has also started to embrace some of these second-time-around singles, without TikTok to first drum up newfound interest in them (and demonstrate proof of concept of them as modern-day hits), it’s unlikely they’d be willing to take chances on songs like “Influence” as early adopters.

2. Fewer one-offs. Back in 2020, Billboard wrote about a number of artists TikTok had helped launch into the pop mainstream for one song, and asked if the app would be able to help sustain extended careers for them as hitmakers. Based on the great majority of the artists mentioned in the story — Arizona Zervas, Tones and I, Powfu, SAINt JHN, Surfaces, Trevor Daniel, StaySolidRocky, 24kGoldn, Surf Mesa — the answer would appear to be “no”; after their initial TikTok-boosted chart success, none of those artists have yet charted a second top 40 Hot 100 hit, and most have yet to even scrape the chart a second time.

There have been exceptions, of course — particularly the aforementioned Doja Cat and Lil Nas X, two of the biggest stars of the new decade, who were able to launch numerous hits with TikTok’s help and ultimately establish continuous stardom well beyond the app. But the speed with which TikTok generates breakout hits and the relatively anonymous relationship they often establish between listener and song — often divorced from any larger connection with the artist behind them — has been a recipe for creating single successes that prove a foot in the door to the larger mainstream for their artists, but nowhere near a guarantee of additional future hits.

In truth, without TikTok, we’d likely not only see fewer one-off hits, but fewer breakout hits from new artists in general. With the influence of both labels and tastemakers being diminished in the streaming era, and radio positioning itself more as a late-adopter of established hits than a breaker of new ones (a strategy that could reverse, or at least lessen, post-TikTok), TiKTok has been the rare platform over which previously unestablished artists have been able to reach mass audiences — if not necessarily reliably, or repeatedly.

3. Bigger and longer-lasting album bombs. Without the natural rise-and-fall of TikTok virality to help generate prominent movement up and down the Hot 100, stasis will be even more unavoidable on the chart. While that will be felt in every tier of the chart, it will perhaps be most noticeable in the chart’s middle and lower regions — which, without TikTok-driven hits, will become even more the province of the biggest albums of recent weeks.

While highly anticipated albums charting the majority or entirety of their tracklists on the Hot 100 upon their chart debuts is certainly nothing new, in the last couple years some of those albums — like Bad Bunny‘s Un Verano Sin Ti and SZA‘s SOS — have not only overtaken the chart in their first weeks, but had as many as a dozen songs continue to linger on it well after. Big artists and big releases are more omnipresent on the charts than ever, and if TikTok isn’t around to help generate new hits to siphon off momentum from (and ultimately displace) them, those album cuts will continue to play the part of hit singles in the thick of the Hot 100.

4. Less alt/indie and regional Mexican. One way TikTok’s imprint has been felt on the Hot 100 has been the rise in crossovers from the indie and alternative worlds. Hits from bands like Glass Animals, The Walters and Måneskin and singer-songwriters like d4vd, Lizzy McAlpine and Mac DeMarco all have found their way to the chart after gaining popularity on the app — where five years ago they likely would have had no real pathway to that kind of crossover success on streaming or radio, with any kind guitar-based rock music an increasingly rare presence in the pop mainstream.

Would they disappear on the Hot 100 without TikTok around to boost them? Maybe not entirely — especially after a pop-punk revival (and guitar-oriented hits from pop stars like Olivia Rodrigo, Juice WRLD and Billie Eilish) helped once again normalize guitar in the top 40 of the early 2020s — but it would certainly be a major additional challenge for newer alt and indie artists to get the kind of streaming exposure they need to cross over.

The same could be said of regional Mexican acts like Grupo Firme, Yahritza y Su Esencia and Peso Pluma — all of whom have suddenly made a genre that had literally zero history on the Hot 100 prior to 2021 into a major factor on the chart, with each act scoring top 40 hits in the last year, boosted enormously by their TikTok presences. Those artists have still yet to achieve even the relatively modest level of stateside mainstream pop exposure or acceptance that most of the aforementioned alt/indie acts have, so losing TikTok would likely be an enormous blow to their chart fortunes.

5. Longer chart runs — but fewer truly historic ones. As already mentioned, TikTok success is one of the primary accelerants on the Hot 100 these days — the force that gets songs zooming up and plummeting down the chart with disruptive speed — and without it, a lot of songs are going to stay in place for a very long time. The slowing pace of radio and streaming in the 2020s has already resulted in seemingly endless, borderline-historic stays for hits like Dua Lipa‘s “Levitating,” The Kid LAROI and Justin Bieber‘s “Stay” and Harry Styles‘ “As It Was” in the chart’s top regions, and certainly without TikTok, there will be even fewer impediments to those songs staying in place for as long as the mainstream will have them.

However, the loss of TikTok could also impact these hits’ endurance in the other direction — preventing them from ever reaching the truly unprecedented territory tread by hits like The Weeknd‘s “Blinding Lights” and Glass Animals’ “Heat Waves.” Those songs’ journeys were marked by late-cresting waves of TikTok popularity, which helped them recapture momentum at key moments in their chart treks, reinvigorating their streaming and radio presences in the process. Without those unpredictable second and/or third lives for the two singles, their respective chart runs would likely never have stretched out as they did — and without the ordered chaos of TikTok, they’re not the kind that anyone could ever meaningfully reproduce inorganically.

Erykah Badu Says This Is What Politicians Really Mean When They Say ‘Woke’

Erykah Badu wishes conservative politicians would just say what they really mean when they invoke the word “woke” to describe progressive policies and practices they are railing against. In an interview with MSNBC’s Ari Melber on Tuesday night (March 28), the singer who sang about staying informed, educated and tuned-in on her 2008 song “Master Teacher” told the host that she can easily read between the lines of what those who rail against the word are really saying.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Badu said that the album that “Teacher” appeared on, New Amerykah Part One (4th World War), was an example of the thoughtful, spiritually zoomed-in singer zooming out at what was going on in the world. But, she added, it had “no solutions… it’s just what I’ve observed.” And while Badu said she was happy to state what the problems were, “Master Teacher” was really part of “start[ing] a lot of stuff.”

In the song, Badu sings, “Even though you go through struggle and strife/ To keep a healthy life, I stay woke (I stay woke).” Melber then played a super-cut of talk show hosts, activists and musicians — including Donald Glover/Childish Gambino singing “I stay woke” from his 2016 song “Redbone” — using the term. Among those invoking it in a pejorative light in the montage were former president Donald Trump, who warned against what he described as, “woke fascism that will destroy our nation,” and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who last year told a crowd, “we will never, ever surrender to the woke mob… Florida is where woke goes to die.”

Mincing no words, Badu told Melber, “I think they mean Black… yeah… it’s just another way to say ‘thug’ or something else, right?” Asked how she feels about the hijacking of the term, a non-plussed Badu said, “it is what it is. It doesn’t belong to us anymore. Once something goes out in the world it take a life of its own.”

The term has its origins in the racial justice movements of the early 1900s as a reminder to the Black community to be conscious and alert to social and racial inequality and injustice. Badu helped bring it to the masses with her song and again in 2012 when she used it in a tweet in support of Russian agit-punk activist band Pussy Riot. “After that, woke took off,” she said of the term that has gained mainstream usage over the past few years in connection with the Black Lives Matter and social justice movements.

“I can tell you what it means,” Badu said. “it just means being aware… being in alignment with nature, because if you’re in alignment with that you’re aware of everything that’s going on.” But, she added, that awareness is not limited to the political arena, but also encompasses your personal health, relationships, home, car and sleep.

Check out Badu’s interview with Melber below.