Evan Rachel Wood
A Los Angeles judge on Tuesday (May 9) dismissed much of Marilyn Mansonâs defamation lawsuit against his ex-fiance, Evan Rachel Wood, ruling that many of his claims were barred under a California law aimed at protecting free speech.
Manson (real name Brian Warner) sued Wood last year, claiming her 2021 accusations of sexual abuse against him had been false and that she had âsecretly recruited, coordinated, and pressuredâ other women to make similar allegations against him to destroy his career.
But Judge Teresa A. Beaudet ruled Tuesday that Manson had not sufficiently shown that he would ultimately be able to prove many of those accusations against Wood, including that she had been âpressuring multiple women to make false accusations,â as well as the allegation that she had forged a letter from the FBI.
The ruling came under Californiaâs so-called anti-SLAPP statute â a law that aims to make it easier for judges to quickly dismiss cases that threaten free speech. Woodâs lawyers claimed Mansonâs case was exactly that: a prominent musician using a lawsuit to try to silence someone who was speaking out publicly about years of alleged abuse.
Anti-SLAPP laws work by putting more burden than usual on defamation plaintiffs like Manson, forcing them to clearly show at the outset that their case is legitimate. In Tuesdayâs decision, Judge Beaudet said Manson had failed to do so.
âThe court does not find that plaintiff has demonstrated a probability of prevailing on his [intentional infliction of emotional distress] claim based on the FBI Letter,â the judge wrote, referring to one of Mansonâs specific legal claims.
Importantly, the decision did not dismiss Mansonâs case entirely, and several claims remain pending against Wood. Those claims will continue into discovery and toward an eventual trial. But the ruling was still a major victory for Wood.
In a statement to Billboard following the decision, Woodâs attorney, Michael Kump, said: âWe are very pleased with the courtâs ruling, which affirms and protects Evanâs exercise of her fundamental First Amendment rights. As the court correctly found, plaintiff failed to show that his claims against her have even minimal merit.â
Wood is one of several women to accuse Manson of serious sexual wrongdoing over the past two years. Manson has denied all of the allegations, and many of the lawsuits filed against him have since been dropped, dismissed or settled.
Manson filed the current lawsuit against Wood in March 2022, accusing her and a woman named Illma Gore of launching an âorganized attackâ that had derailed his career. His lawyer said the women had carried out âa campaign of malicious and unjustified attacks.â
But Wood quickly fought back, moving to strike Mansonâs case under the anti-SLAPP law: âFor years, plaintiff Brian Warner raped and tortured defendant Evan Rachel Wood and threatened retaliation if she told anyone about it,â her attorneys wrote. âWarner has now made good on those threats by filing the present lawsuit.â
Tuesdayâs ruling came despite a bombshell recantation by Ashley Morgan Smithline, another woman who has accused Manson of wrongdoing. In a February filing submitted by Mansonâs lawyers, Smithline said she had âsuccumbed to pressureâ from Wood to make âuntrueâ accusations against Manson.
But Wood strongly denied those allegations, and Judge Beaudet ultimately refused to consider Smithlineâs statements entirely, saying they had been filed far past a key deadline for submitting evidence. That means the statements about Woodâs âpressureâ played no role in Tuesdayâs decision.
In a statement to Billboard, Mansonâs lawyer, Howard King, said the ruling was âdisappointing but not unexpected.â
âThe court telegraphed this outcome when it refused to consider the bombshell sworn declaration of former plaintiff Ashley Smithline, which detailed how women were systematically pressured by Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore to make false claims about Brian Warner,â King said.
âThe failure to admit this critical evidence, along with the courtâs decision to not consider Ms. Goreâs iPad, the contents of which demonstrated how she and Ms. Wood crafted a forged FBI letter, will be the subject of an immediate appeal to the California Court of Appeal,â King added.
Evan Rachel Wood is strongly denying allegations that she âmanipulatedâ Ashley Morgan Smithline into making allegations of rape against Marilyn Manson.
Days after Smithline made those explosive accusations, Wood filed her own declaration in Los Angeles Court on Monday (Feb. 27), saying she had proof that it was Smithline who had first contacted her with accusations against Manson (real name Brian Warner), not vice-versa.
âI never pressured or manipulated Ashley Morgan Smithline to make any accusations against plaintiff Brian Warner, and I certainly never pressured or manipulated her to make accusations that were not true,â Wood wrote in the filing.
Wood attached screenshots of purported text message conversations, including one in which Smithline told her âI have no reason to make this up!â Another set of messages read: âJust know you set me free. By listening. I love you.â
âMs. Smithline has always told me that she was abused by Mr. Warner,â Wood wrote.
Smithline and Wood are two of several women to accuse Manson of serious sexual wrongdoing over the past two years. After Wood posted her allegations to Instagram in February 2021, lawsuits quickly followed from Smithline, Mansonâs former assistant Ashley Walters, Game of Thrones actress EsmĂŠ Bianco and two Jane Doe accusers.
Manson has denied all of the allegations, and the cases by Smithline, Walters and Bianco have since been dropped or dismissed. Now, Manson is pursuing his own defamation lawsuit, claiming that Wood and another woman, Illma Gore, had âsecretly recruited, coordinated, and pressured prospective accusers to emerge simultaneouslyâ with false accusations against him.
In a filing last week in that defamation case, Smithline made her bombshell accusations about âmanipulationâ against Wood: âI succumbed to pressure from Evan Rachel Wood and her associates to make accusations of rape and assault against Mr. Warner that were not true.â
In a response on Monday, Woodâs lawyers submitted Woodâs declaration stating that she had never coerced Smithline. They also filed formal arguments urging the judge to ignore Smithlineâs new declaration, calling it nothing more than a âbad-faith attemptâ by Mansonâs lawyers to save his âmeritlessâ defamation lawsuit against Wood from being dismissed.
âDocumented evidence shows that it was Smithline who reached out to Wood about plaintiffâs abuse more than a year before Smithline now claims defendants somehow convinced her that she was abused,â Woodâs lawyers wrote.
In a statement to Billboard on Tuesday in response to Woodâs new filings, Mansonâs attorney Howard King said: âIt is unsurprising that Evan Rachel Wood is desperately fighting to keep Ashley Smithlineâs testimony out of court â because she knows the truth will expose her plot to manipulate the women who trusted her in order to destroy Brian Warner.â
On top of denying Smithlineâs accusations about manipulation, Mondayâs filings from Wood and her attorneys also came with explosive new allegations of their own.
In a separate declaration, a supposed friend of Smithline named Karl Neilson stated that he was in possession of a voicemail from July 2022 in which Smithline had told him that Mansonâs lawyer, King, had improperly reached out to her directly to discuss the case â and that she was worried he was trying to get her to flip on Mansonâs other accusers.
âI have not called back, obviously. Obviously, itâs very clear that a lawyer legally shouldnât and canât call me without calling my lawyer directly,â Smithline allegedly said in the voicemail to Neilson.
âThe only reason why he would be calling me at all, a week ago, and leaving a message is that he thinks Iâm the weak link, and he might want to settle with me to turn on the other girls, and say that it was all, like, a ruse,â Smithline allegedly said in the voicemail to Neilson.
In his statement to Billboard on Tuesday, King flatly denied that he had improperly reached out to Smithline.
âI never discussed Ashley Smithlineâs claims against Brian Warner until after she had reached out to me and terminated her counsel,â King said. âMoreover, when Ms. Smithline recently spoke with me for almost two hours, we taped the conversation in full and that recording proves that every single thing in her declaration was taken from her words, not mine.â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cb91/0cb91be1aee11aac19aa9c488a3be34a48cc6fd9" alt="blank"
A woman who sued Marilyn Manson for sexual assault says in a new legal filing that the allegations were untrue, claiming she had been âmanipulatedâ by the rockerâs ex-girlfriend, Evan Rachel Wood.
With Manson currently suing Wood for allegedly orchestrating an âorganized attackâ of false rape accusations, the singerâs lawyers filed a bombshell statement Thursday (Feb. 23) from Ashley Morgan Smithline â one of several women who has accused Manson of sexual abuse over the past two years.
In it, Smithline claims that she had been âmanipulated by Ms. Woodâ and others, and eventually had agreed to âspread publicly false accusations of abuseâ against Manson (real name Brian Warner).
âI succumbed to pressure from Evan Rachel Wood and her associates to make accusations of rape and assault against Mr. Warner that were not true,â Smithline wrote in the sworn statement. âEventually, I started to believe that what I was repeatedly told happened to Ms. Wood and [others] also happened to me.â
In a statement to Billboard, a spokesperson for Wood strongly denied Smithlineâs accusations: âEvan never pressured or manipulated Ashley. It was Ashley who first contacted Evan about the abuse she had suffered. Itâs unfortunate that the harassment and threats Ashley received after filing her federal lawsuit appear to have pressured her to change her testimony.â
The statement by Smithline is a major revelation in Mansonâs two-year legal saga, in which at least five women have accused him of serious sexual wrongdoing. After Wood posted her allegations to Instagram in February 2021, lawsuits quickly followed from Smithline, Mansonâs former assistant Ashley Walters, Game of Thrones actress Esme Bianco and a Jane Doe accuser.
Smithlineâs case was dismissed last month after she fired her lawyer and stopped participating in the case.
Manson has denied all of the allegations and filed his own defamation lawsuit in March 2022 claiming that Wood and another woman, Illma Gore, had âsecretly recruited, coordinated, and pressured prospective accusers to emerge simultaneouslyâ with false accusations against him.
In her declaration on Thursday, Smithline told a story that supported Mansonâs allegations against Wood. She said she had been initially contacted by other alleged victims and, when she denied that such abuse had happened to her, was repeatedly told that she might just not remember it.
âWhile at first I knew Mr. Warner did not do these things to me, I eventually I began to question whether he actually did,â Smithline wrote. âOn numerous occasions, I was told ⌠that I may just be misremembering what happened, repressing my memories of what happened, or that my memories had not yet surfaced â which they said happened to people against whom these acts were perpetrated.â
Eventually, Smithline said she agreed to participate. She said Gore drafted an accusation statement for her and posted it to her account for her, and that she was then connected with Jay Ellwanger, the same lawyer who represented Bianco.
âLeading up to the filing of the complaint, I felt pressured by Mr. Ellwanger to go on a press tour, which included an interview on The View and an interview and photoshoot with People magazine,â Smithline wrote. âI was very uncomfortable doing this press but felt pressured to do it.â
Smithline also noted that she had ânever received any moneyâ from Manson as part of any settlement agreement to stop pursuing her case and that she did not intend to refile her case against him.
âLooking back, I feel I was manipulated by Ms. Wood, Ms. Gore, Ms. Bianco, and Mr. Ellwanger to spread publicly false accusations of abuse against Mr. Warner,â Smithline wrote.
In a statement to Billboard, Ellwanger said that his response to Smithlineâs allegations was âconstrained by ethical obligations regarding client confidentialityâ to his former client. âBut what I can say is that the specific allegations regarding my representation of Ms. Smithline are categorically and verifiably false.â
The new revelations come as Woodâs attorneys are seeking to dismiss Mansonâs case by citing Californiaâs so-called anti-SLAPP statute â a law that aims to make it easier to dismiss cases that threaten free speech. Woodâs lawyers say Mansonâs case is exactly that: an effort to punish Wood after she chose to speak publicly about years of abuse.
âFor years, plaintiff Brian Warner raped and tortured defendant Evan Rachel Wood and threatened retaliation if she told anyone about it,â her attorneys wrote. âWarner has now made good on those threats by filing the present lawsuit.â
Mansonâs attorneys want to cite Thursdayâs new statements from Smithline as a reason to deny the anti-SLAPP motion since such motions require courts to assess the validity of a caseâs allegations. In asking the court to heed the filing, they wrote: âThis newly obtained evidence is critical to Warnerâs opposition to the anti-SLAPP motions, in which defendants argue that there is no âadmissible evidence substantiating his allegations.ââ
In a statement to Billboard, Mansonâs attorney, Howard King, said Smithlineâs declaration âprovesâ that the lawsuitâs core accusations are true. âAs we have always said, the coordinated campaign of #MeToo lies against Brian Warner is going to go down as one of the greatest hoaxes of all time,â King said. âVulnerable women were manipulated by unscrupulous individuals seeking to build their own brands and pursue their own vendettas.â
Read Smithlineâs entire declaration here:
In February 2021, Westworld star Evan Rachel Wood named Marilyn Manson as her alleged abuser.
âI am here to expose this dangerous man and call out the many industries that have enabled him, before he ruins any more lives. I stand with the many victims who will no longer be silent,â she shared via Instagram on Feb 1. Wood and Manson had a relationship when the actress was 18 and Manson was 36, and the pair were briefly engaged in 2010.
Manson denied the allegations in his own Instagram statement. âObviously, my art and my life have long been magnets for controversy, but these recent claims about me are horrible distortions of reality,â he wrote. âMy intimate relationships have always been entirely consensual with like-minded partners. Regardless of how â and why â others are now choosing to misinterpret the past, that is the truth.â
Billboard made earlier attempts to reach Manson for comment through his now former management, but has not received any responses.
Following Woodâs statement, a number of other women went public with their own claims against Manson, but his history with abuse allegations stems back nearly 25 years. See below for a full timeline.
-
Pages