Business
Page: 74
Punjabi superstar AP Dhillon has signed a label deal with Republic Records, Billboard can exclusively confirm. The singer-songwriter-producer’s first release on the label will be “Old Money,” a new single and video arriving this Friday (Aug. 9), with a new album, The Brownprint, following two weeks later, on Aug. 23.
Explore
Explore
See latest videos, charts and news
See latest videos, charts and news
“Republic Records always saw the vision,” Dhillon says in a statement. “They got and understood who I am from day one. We’re all in harmony when it comes to this new music, and now I just can’t wait to show everybody what we’ve been cooking up.”
Monte Lipman, founder and chairman of Republic, adds, “AP Dhillon is not only an incredible artist who continues to defy gravity in real time, but a shrewd visionary with a global reach that has already sparked a cultural revolution. We’re thrilled to join forces with Universal Music Canada under the leadership of Chairman and C.E.O. Jeffrey Remedios to further extend AP’s impact and music around the world.”
Trending on Billboard
Born in India, Dhillon moved to Vancouver Island as a college student in 2015, and began independently releasing music in 2019. His 2020 single “Brown Munde” (“Brown Boys” in Punjabi) became a breakthrough, and has amassed nearly 700 million YouTube views to date.
Dhillon spent the following years touring globally while playing to arena audiences in Canada; now established as one of the more prominent Punjabi artists on the planet, his catalog has earned 94.5 million on-demand official U.S. streams, and 1.8 billion on-demand official global streams, according to Luminate.
Dhillon directed the music video for upcoming single “Old Money,” and the clip will star Bollywood icons Salman Khan and Sanjay Dutt. “‘Old Money’ is the perfect way for me to start my next era, especially with going big for the music video,” he says. “I came up with a concept that was influenced by all my favorite action movies, and Salman Khan and Sanjay Dutt showed up and killed it. I hope you love it as much as I do.”
Meanwhile, Dhillon co-produced the majority of The Brownprint, with DŹŁ (Future, Central Cee), Luca Mauti (J.Cole, Eminem) and AzizTheShake (BIA, Central Cee) also contributing to the upcoming album.
LONDON — “We live to fight another day,” says a weary but cautiously optimistic Oliver Jones, looking back on this year’s Deer Shed Festival, which featured headline performances from bands The Coral, Bombay Bicycle Club and rising Irish singer CMAT, and took place under crystal blue skies July 26-29 in Baldersby Park, Yorkshire.
“I don’t know if we’ll make any money. We’ll likely just break-even but there were a lot of positives,” says the festival director, who co-founded the annual family-friendly event in 2010. This year’s Deer Shed sold around 80% of its 10,000 tickets, but good weather drove healthy bar and food sales, helping ensure the festival’s survival for at least one more run, hopefully several more, says Jones.
“The festival market is very volatile and there’s no big pot of money in the bank that will see us through a bad year,” he says. “Thankfully, this year appears to be a success. I feel like we’re back on track from pre-Covid times.”
Trending on Billboard
Other music festivals in the United Kingdom have not been so lucky. According to the Association of Independent Festivals (AIF), 56 music festivals have either canceled, postponed or closed for good in the U.K. so far this year, up from 36 in 2023, with Hertfordshire’s Standon Calling and El Dorado Festival, and Cheshire’s Bluedot among the big-name casualties.
“The economics of putting on a festival have become so tough because supply chain costs have gone through the roof. All our members are feeling the pinch,” says AIF chief executive John Rostron. He says that promoters of small and mid-sized independent festivals, which already operate on tight margins, are suffering the most from production cost rises of over 30% compared to pre-pandemic levels.
In response, Jones brought several services in-house, such as marketing and talent booking, for this year’s Deer Shed Festival. He says the event also relies on favorable rates from local suppliers and free use of the festival site.
U.K. festivals of all sizes are also having to contend with the ongoing impact of high inflation, which peaked at over 11% in October 2022 and currently sits at around 4.2%, eating into music fans’ disposable income. The post-pandemic trend of audiences buying tickets later in the on-sale period, often waiting right up until the eve of an event, has added to promoters’ anxieties, says Rostron. AIF says overall ticket sales are around 4% down on last year among its 200-plus members.
“That 4% can be the difference between a promoter breaking even and them making a loss and not returning,” says Rostron, who warns that without government intervention the number of festival cancellations in U.K. could rise to 100 by the end of the summer season.
Festival promoters in central Europe are likewise facing rising production costs and changing audience tastes, although local live executives tell Billboard that the region has not been as heavily impacted as the U.K., where the launch of hundreds of new music festivals over the past decade has created a densely crowded market.
Nevertheless, a high number of European festivals have been called off this summer due to wide variety of factors, including low ticket sales, competing sporting events, lack of resources and personnel, and extreme rainfall. Among them: France’s Lollapalooza Paris 2024; Belgium’s Werchter Boutique and TW Classic; Ireland’s Wild Roots and Body and Soul; and the Netherlands’ Karnaval and Chillville festivals.
Promoters in France are also having to contend with a shortage of security and production staff because of the Paris Olympic Games, which runs until Aug. 11 and has employed a large percentage of the temporary workforce that typically works at summer music events. As a result, a number of French music festivals have been forced to either downsize, postpone until next year, or raise prices to stand a chance of breaking even.
“Many [French festival] promoters are quite afraid this season,” says Marie Sabot, director of We Love Green festival, which took place in Paris, May 31-June 2. Tickets for the 40,000-daily-capacity event — headlined by Burna Boy, Justice and SZA – cost 169 euro for a three-day pass, up 15% on 2023’s prices, with sales totaling 110,000. But bad weather in France and elsewhere in Europe in spring and early summer meant advance sales for We Love Green and many other festivals were slower than previous years, says Sabot, who represents festivals on the board of French live music trade group Ekhoscènes.
Sabot says an increase in the number of standalone shows by major touring artists such as AC/DC, Bruce Springsteen and Taylor Swift, who played four sold out shows at Paris La Défense Arena in May, has made a tough festival market even tougher. “We have too many headline shows this year,” she says. “The only territories [in France] where we have festivals that are [performing] quite strong are really far from the cities where they are not competing with big venues and arenas.”
Despite the economic challenges facing the sector, demand for live music still remains high across Europe, say executives. Many summer festivals, large and small, are sellouts, including Glastonbury, Green Man, Creamfields and Kendal Calling in the U.K.; Lowlands in the Netherlands and Tomorrowland in Belgium.
France’s Rock En Seine, which takes place Aug. 22-25 in Saint-Cloud and features Lana Del Rey, Fred Again… and LCD Soundsystem, is enjoying its “strongest year” in the event’s 19-year history, says Jim King, CEO of European Festivals at AEG. “We’re not seeing any significant shift in trends at the moment across our French business and Rock en Seine is selling at a much higher rate in advance sales than we have ever experienced,” says King.
John Reid, president of Live Nation Europe, calls the region’s festival market “massively competitive and always evolving.” He says that while there are always local challenges to navigate, the company is “seeing strong sales and continued overall growth” across Europe in 2024 with early summer highlights including Belgium’s Rock Werchter and the “biggest year ever” for Oslo’s Tons of Rock festival, which is now the largest festival in Norway. In the U.K and Ireland, Europe’s biggest live music market, Live Nation will host almost five million people at festivals this summer, says the firm’s U.K. and Ireland chairman Denis Desmond, “demonstrating that festivals remain vital to our cultural life.”
In order to protect the future health of the sector, live executives in the U.K. are calling on the newly elected Labour government to lower the rate of VAT sales tax charged on festival and concert tickets from 20% and bring it closer in line with other European countries, where the equivalent tax is typically set at under 10%.
Such tax benefits offer “a huge advantage” to the European live industry, says AEG’s Jim King, who calls on authorities in the U.K. “and all governments to follow this example.” The Association of Independent Festivals’ John Rostron says that reducing VAT on festival tickets to 5% — a temporary measure the U.K. government took during the pandemic – is the “silver bullet” the sector desperately needs. “Without it, we’re likely to see more promoters throw in the towel,” says Rostron.
Live executives in the Netherlands fear that they too could soon be hit by a rise in taxes on ticket sales for music, sports and cultural events with VAT rates due to increase from 9% to 21% in January 2026.
“The festival market is always in flux,” says Berend Schans, director of the Dutch Association of Music Venues and Festivals (VNPF), who opposes the proposed tax rise.
“Every year, some festivals disappear and new ones emerge,” says Schans. “However, we cannot deny that material costs, procurement costs, including artist fees, and personnel costs are skyrocketing, meaning that margins will be tighter for many festival organizers.”
We are in a transformative era of music technology.
The music industry will continue to experience growth throughout the decade, with total music revenue reaching approximately $131 billion by 2030, according to Goldman Sachs. This lucrative business is built on streaming but also witnessing an unprecedented surge in innovation and entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence. With over 300,000 tech and media professionals laid off since the beginning of 2023, according to TechCrunch, a new wave of talent has been funneled into music tech startups. This influx, coupled with the dramatic decrease in cloud storage costs and the global rise of developer talent, has catalyzed the emergence of many startups (over 400 that we have tracked) dedicated to redefining the music business through AI.
These music tech startups are not just changing the way music is made and released; they are reshaping the very fabric of the industry. They’re well-funded, too. After raising over $4.8 billion in 2022, music tech startups and companies raised almost $10 billion in funding in 2023, according to Digital Music News, indicating that venture capitalists and investors are highly optimistic about the future growth of music technology.
As Matt Cartmell, CEO of Music Technology UK, said, “Our members want us to present the music tech sector as a highly investible proposition, educating investors about the opportunities that lie within. Music tech firms are also looking for innovative models of engagement with labels, DSPs and artists, as well as looking for our help to bring diverse talent into the industry, removing the barriers that continue to restrict individuals with passion and enthusiasm from a career in music technology.”
Trending on Billboard
Riding this wave of investment, several startups have already made a splash in the music AI space. Below is an overview of a few of those companies and how they’re contributing to the industry’s rapid evolution.
Generative AI: The New Frontier
At the heart of this revolution is generative AI, a technology rapidly becoming indispensable for creators across the spectrum. From novices to professional artists and producers, AI-powered platforms offer unprecedented musical expression and innovation opportunities. It’s now possible for users without any formal musical training to craft songs in many genres, effectively democratizing music production. Music fans or content creators can utilize products that score their social content, while seasoned musicians can use these tools to enhance their creative workflows.
“I like to think of generative AI as a new wave of musical instruments,” says Dr. Maya Ackerman, founder of Wave AI, a company that has introduced tools to aid human songwriters. “The most useful AI tools for artists are those that the musicians can ‘play,’ meaning that the musician is in full control, using the AI to aid in their self-expression rather than be hindered.” These tools focus on generating vocal melodies, chords and lyrics, emphasizing collaboration with musicians rather than replacing them.
For non-professionals, one ambitious company, Beatoven.ai, is building a product to generate music in a host of different ways for many different use cases. “(Users) can get a piece of music generated and customize it as per their content without much knowledge of music,” says Siddharth Bhardwaj, co-founder/CTO of Beatoven. “Going forward, we are working on capturing their intent in the form of multimodal input (text, video, images and audio) and getting them as close to their requirements as possible.”
The concept of “artist as an avatar” has become increasingly popular, which draws inspiration from the gaming community. Companies like CreateSafe, the startup powering Grimes’ elf.tech, have built generative audio models that enable anyone to either license the voice of a well-known artist or replicate their own voice. This innovative approach also reflects the adaptive and forward-thinking nature of artists. Established artists like deadmau5, Richie Hawtin and Ólafur Arnalds have also delved into AI initiatives and investments. Furthermore, a few innovators are crafting AI music tools tailored for the gaming community, potentially paving the way for the fusion of music and gaming through real-time personalization and adaptive soundtracks during gameplay.
The Community and Collaboration Ecosystem
The journey of music creation is often fraught with challenges, including tedious workflows and a sense of isolation. Recognizing this, several startups are focusing on building communities around music creation and feedback. The Singapore-based music tech giant BandLab recently announced that it has acquired a user base of 100 million, making it one of the biggest success stories in this arena. “Our strength lies in our comprehensive approach to our audience’s needs. From the moment of inspiration to distribution, our platform is designed to be a complete toolkit for music creators and their journey,” says founder Meng Ro Kuok. There are several startups pioneering spaces where creators can collaborate, share insights and support each other, heralding a new era of collective creativity.
A Toolkit for Every Aspect of Music Production
This landscape of music tech startups offers a comprehensive toolkit that caters to every facet of the music creation process:
Track and Stem Organization. Platforms like Audioshake simplify the management of tracks and stems, streamlining the production process.
Vocal & Instrument Addition. These technologies allow for the addition of any human voice or instrument sound to a recording environment, expanding the possibilities for frictionless creativity.
Sound Libraries. Services provide or generate extensive libraries of samples, beats and sounds, offering artists a rich palette.
Mix and Master. The process of mixing and mastering audio has historically relied heavily on human involvement. However, several startups are utilizing AI technology to automate these services for a more comprehensive audio production experience. Others also offer the ability to convert stereo songs to spatial audio.
Remixing and Freelance Musicianship. Many platforms now offer creative and innovative solutions for remixing music. Additionally, some platforms allow users to easily source and connect with talented artists, session musicians and other music professionals. Need an orchestra? There are tech platforms that can arrange and source one for you remotely.
The Future of Music Tech: A Vision of Inclusivity and Innovation
The barriers that once kept people from participating in music creation are falling away. Now, anyone with a passion for sound can create content, engage with fans, find a community and even monetize their work. This more accessible and collaborative music ecosystem offers an exciting glimpse into a future where anyone can participate in the art of creation. The explosion of creators, facilitated by these technologies, also suggests a new economic opportunity for the industry to service this growing creator class.
Drew Thurlow is the founder of Opening Ceremony Media where he advises music and music tech companies. Previously he was senior vp of A&R at Sony Music, and director of artists partnerships & industry relations at Pandora. His first book, about music & AI, will be released by Routledge in early 2026.
Rufy Anam Ghazi is a seasoned music business professional with over eight years of experience in product development, data analysis, research, business strategy, and partnerships. Known for her data-driven decision-making and innovative approach, she has successfully led product development, market analysis, and strategic growth initiatives, fostering strong industry relationships.
Singer/songwriter Lisa Loeb will keynote the Guild of Music Supervisors’ 10th annual State of Music in Media Conference, which will take place on Saturday, Aug. 17 at the West LA College campus in Culver City, Calif. People can also attend virtually, via a live stream on Zoom. The all-day conference encompasses the use of music in film, TV, video games, advertising and trailers.
Thirty years ago this month, Lisa Loeb & Nine Stories became the first artist to top the Billboard Hot 100 before being personally signed to a record label. She achieved the feat with her song “Stay (I Miss You),” which was heard in the film Reality Bites. It topped the chart for the first three weeks of August 1994.
Other speakers include director Doug Liman and music supervisors Julianne Jordan, Amanda Krieg Thomas, John Houlihan, Carolyn Owens, Steven Gizicki, Trygge Toven, Joel C. High, Thomas Golubić, Catherine Grieves and Burt Blackarach. In addition, Julia Michels, president of the Los Angeles chapter of the Recording Academy, and Qiana Conley Akinro, senior executive director of the L.A. chapter, will speak.
Trending on Billboard
Programming highlights include:
Opening remarks from GMS president Lindsay Wolfington and GMS vp Heather Guibert
Celebrating the 2024 Primetime Emmy nominees for outstanding music supervision
AI: Challenges and Changes to the Industry and New Opportunities for Creatives
A conversation with music supervisor Julianne Jordan & director Doug Liman
Live listening session with music supervisors
Art Meets Commerce: What Makes Trailer Music Supervision Different
FALLOUT: From Game to Streaming Series
From Coordinator to Supervisor: Navigating the Leap
GMS is offering a one-on-one networking session for aspiring music supervisors to meet GMS members working in the field of music supervision. This opportunity is open to aspiring music supervisors only. Conference attendance and pre-event sign-up are required.
GMS’ first-ever music supervisor listening session will feature music supervisors giving live feedback on five songs selected from Friend of the Guild (“FOG”) submissions. Participants can learn how top music supervisors in TV, film, video games, ads and trailers respond to tracks when considering them for placement.
A conference ticket purchase comes with a complimentary “Friend of the Guild” subscription, granting access to future events and networking opportunities. To learn more and buy tickets, visit the GMS Media Conference site.
Radio stocks struggled this week as companies’ second-quarter earnings revealed additional revenue losses.
SiriusXM shares fell 15.6% after the company’s second-quarter earnings on Thursday (Aug. 1) showed a loss of 173,000 satellite radio subscribers and 41,000 Pandora subscribers. Revenue fell 3% to $2.18 billion, although net profit improved 2% to $316 million. In the first quarter, SiriusXM lost 594,000 subscribers, although revenue improved 0.8% to $2.16 billion.
SiriusXM is trying to thread the needle as it expands its product line and gives consumers more options. The new $9.99-per-month streaming service is intended to appeal to a broader audience than potential satellite radio subscribers. At the same time, the company is introducing new pricing tiers for satellite radio, including a $9.99 music-only subscription that can expand to news, talk and sports for additional fees. The trick is not cannibalizing its core, higher-priced satellite offering. “The early results in our testing have been encouraging,” CEO Jennifer Witz said during Thursday’s earnings call. “It shows that we’re getting consumers into the right packages for them.”
Shares of radio broadcaster Cumulus Media fell 21% to $1.62 and dropped as far as $1.29 on Friday (Aug. 2) — a 52-week low — after the company’s second-quarter earnings showed that revenue fell 2.5% and net loss increased to $27.7 million from $1.1 million a year earlier. iHeartMedia, which doesn’t report earnings until Thursday (Aug. 8), appeared to be a casualty of Cumulus Media’s results as its shares fell 12.9% to $1.49.
Trending on Billboard
Collectively, radio companies have had the worst stock performance of all music companies this year. Year to date, Cumulus Media is down 69.5%, iHeartMedia has fallen 44.2% and SiriusXM is off 42.6%. Only JYP Entertainment, which has fallen 44.3% year to date, has suffered a similar drop.
The Billboard Global Music Index (BGMI), a measure of the market capitalizations of 20 publicly traded music companies, fell 1.1% to 1,739.18. Even though 13 of the 20 stocks lost ground — five of them suffering double-digit declines — gains by some of the index’s most valuable companies nearly offset the losses. HYBE improved 5.3% to 180,800 won ($139.01). Spotify gained 2.8% to $331.02. And Universal Music Group (UMG) rose 0.5% to 21.44 euros ($23.41).
Music stocks have had a case of the summer doldrums after soaring in the winter and spring. The BGMI has fallen for four consecutive weeks and stands 5.9% below its all-time high of 1,847.64 set on May 17. On Friday, the index reached its lowest point since April 19.
Music companies’ losses were compounded by sharp declines in U.S. stock markets on Friday after news that the unemployment rate rose in July stoked fears the economy could enter a recession. The tech-heavy Nasdaq fell 3.4% this week and stood in “correction” territory, at 10.1% below its all-time high set on July 11. Amazon fell 8.0% after missing revenue expectations and providing investors with a disappointing forecast. Intel fell 31.5% after announcing broad layoffs, reporting a decline in quarterly revenue and issuing weak guidance.
The S&P 500 dropped 2.1% to 5,346.56. In the United Kingdom, the FTSE 100 gained 2.3% to 8,474.71. South Korea’s KOSPI composite index dropped 2.0% to 2,676.19. China’s Shanghai Composite Index improved 0.5% to 2,905.34.
The week’s greatest gainer was K-pop company JYP Entertainment, which rose 6% to 56,400 won ($41.53). JYP was added to the BGMI this week after Hipgnosis Songs Fund was removed from the London Stock Exchange once its acquisition by Blackstone was completed. Three other K-pop companies were among the week’s few gainers: HYBE improved 5.3%, YG Entertainment rose 2.1% and and SM Entertainment increased 1.0%.
Reservoir Media dropped 14.4% to $7.37 after releasing its quarterly earnings on Wednesday (July 31). Tencent Music Entertainment, which will report earnings on Aug. 13, fell 10.5% to $12.62. Warner Music Group (WMG) fell 5.3% to $28.26. In the wake of UMG’s latest earnings results, which showed a slowdown in subscription revenue, J.P. Morgan dropped its price target on shares of WMG — which will report earnings on Aug. 7 — to $41.00 from $42.00.
The Justice Department sued TikTok on Friday, accusing the company of violating children’s online privacy law and running afoul of a settlement it had reached with another federal agency.
The complaint, filed together with the Federal Trade Commission in a California federal court, comes as the U.S. and the prominent social media company are embroiled in yet another legal battle that will determine if – or how – TikTok will continue to operate in the country.
The latest lawsuit focuses on allegations that TikTok, a trend-setting platform popular among young users, and its China-based parent company ByteDance violated a federal law that requires kid-oriented apps and websites to get parental consent before collecting personal information of children under 13. It also says the companies failed to honor requests from parents who wanted their children’s accounts deleted, and chose not to delete accounts even when the firms knew they belonged to kids under 13.
“This action is necessary to prevent the defendants, who are repeat offenders and operate on a massive scale, from collecting and using young children’s private information without any parental consent or control,” Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said in a statement.
Trending on Billboard
TikTok said it disagreed with the allegations, “many of which relate to past events and practices that are factually inaccurate or have been addressed.”
“We offer age-appropriate experiences with stringent safeguards, proactively remove suspected underage users and have voluntarily launched features such as default screentime limits, Family Pairing, and additional privacy protections for minors,” the company said in a statement.
The U.S. decided to file the lawsuit following an investigation by the FTC that looked into whether the companies were complying with a previous settlement involving TikTok’s predecessor, Musical.ly.
In 2019, the federal government sued Musical.ly, alleging it violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, by failing to notify parents about its collection and use of personal information for kids under 13.
That same year, Musical.ly — acquired by ByteDance in 2017 and merged with TikTok — agreed to pay $5.7 million to resolve those allegations. The two companies were also subject to a court order requiring them to comply with COPPA, which the government says hasn’t happened.
In the complaint, the Justice Department and the FTC allege TikTok has knowingly allowed children to create accounts and retained their personal information without notifying their parents. This practice extends to accounts created in “Kids Mode,” a version of TikTok for children under 13. The feature allows users to view videos but bars them from uploading content.
The two agencies allege the information collected included activities on the app and other identifiers used to build user profiles. They also accuse TikTok of sharing the data with other companies – such as Meta’s Facebook and an analytics company called AppsFlyer – to persuade “Kids Mode” users to be on the platform more, a practice TikTok called “re-targeting less active users.”
The complaint says TikTok also allowed children to create accounts without having to provide their age, or obtain parental approval, by using credentials from third-party services. It classified these as “age unknown” accounts, which the agencies say have grown into millions.
After parents discovered some of their children’s accounts and asked for them to be deleted, federal officials said TikTok asked them to go through a convoluted process to deactivate them and frequently did not honor their requests.
Overall, the government said TikTok employed deficient policies that were unable to prevent children’s accounts from proliferating on its app and suggested the company was not taking the issue seriously. In at least some periods since 2019, the complaint said TikTok’s human moderators spent an average of five to seven seconds reviewing accounts flagged as potentially belonging to a child. It also said TikTok and ByteDance have technology they can use to identify and remove children’s accounts, but do not use them for that reason.
The alleged violations have resulted in millions of children under 13 using the regular TikTok app, allowing them to interact with adults and access adult content, the complaint said.
In March, a person with the matter had told the AP the FTC’s investigation was also looking into whether TikTok violated a portion of federal law that prohibits “unfair and deceptive” business practices by denying that individuals in China had access to U.S. user data.
Those allegations were not included in the complaint, which is asking the court to fine the companies and enter a preliminary injunction to prevent future violations.
Other social media companies have also come under fire for how they’ve handled children’s data.
In 2019, Google and YouTube agreed to pay a $170 million fine to settle allegations that the popular video site had illegally collected personal information on children without their parents’ consent.
And last fall, dozens of U.S. states sued Meta Platforms Inc., which owns Facebook and Instagram, for harming young people and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly and deliberately designing features on Instagram and Facebook that addict children to its platforms. A lawsuit filed by 33 states claims that Meta routinely collects data on children under 13 without their parents’ consent, in violation of COPPA. Nine attorneys general are also filing lawsuits in their respective states, bringing the total number of states taking action to 41 plus Washington, D.C.
This story was originally published by the Associated Press.
The music business is seeing the results of doing more with less.
The slew of earnings reports over the past two weeks have revealed that companies achieved better margins and greater profitability — even in cases with lower revenue or disappointing growth in some areas. And nearly all these companies share one important thing in common that boosted their latest earnings results: layoffs.
Universal Music Group’s share price fell 24% the day after its second-quarter earnings showed recorded music subscription growth had slowed to 6.9%, down from 12.5% in the prior-year period. Investors are interested in music companies because streaming has transformed the industry, bringing growth in the wake of falling CD and download sales and opening new markets around the world. So, when the industry’s most attractive revenue stream stumbles, investors are going to take notice.
But despite the hiccup that wreaked havoc on its share price, many of UMG’s financial metrics showed the company is headed in the right direction. Revenue grew a hearty 9.6%; adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) rose 11.3%; and adjusted earnings per share rose to 0.44 euros ($0.47), up from 0.42 euros ($0.45) a year earlier. Setting aside the main reason investors want to own UMG shares — the global music subscription business — UMG’s earnings had a lot of positives, some of which undoubtedly had to do with the layoffs that occurred in February. According to the company’s 2023 investor presentation, that round of job cuts is expected to save 75 million euros ($81 million) in 2024 alone.
In other earnings news, Spotify — which cut roughly a quarter of its global workforce in three rounds of layoffs in 2023 — had an incredible turnaround in the second quarter, posting an operating income of 266 million euros ($286 million) — a 513 million-euro ($552 million) improvement from the second quarter of 2023. Despite the much smaller staff, the streaming giant’s revenue grew 19.8% to 3.81 billion euros ($4.1 billion) while its gross margin rose to 29.2% from 24.1%. Spotify’s share price jumped 12% after the release and had almost increased another 2% through Thursday (Aug. 1).
Trending on Billboard
Spotify’s latest layoffs in December, which affected 17% of its staff, attracted criticism —“Spotify is screwed,” Wired proclaimed — but they made a large and immediate impact. In the second quarter, total operating expenses dropped 16.5% as every component had a double-digit decline (general and administrative expenses were down 23%, sales and marketing fell 16.3%, and research and development expenses dropped 16.5%). When Spotify announced the staff cuts, CEO Daniel Ek admitted the scope of the layoffs would feel “surprisingly large” but was steadfast in the need to become “relentlessly resourceful.” At the time, he said, “We still have too many people dedicated to supporting work and even doing work around the work rather than contributing to opportunities with real impact.”
Recent staff cuts also appear to have benefitted SiriusXM, which laid off 8% of its workforce in 2023 and another 3% of its headcount in February. Though the satellite radio giant’s share price fell 6.4% on Thursday after the company announced it lost 173,000 satellite radio subscribers and 41,000 Pandora subscribers in the second quarter, net profit grew 1.9% to $316 million even as revenue fell 3% to $2.18 billion. Thanks to its cost-cutting efforts, general and administrative expenses dropped 31% and engineering, design and development costs fell 14.5%.
Not all companies reporting earnings over the last two weeks had to lay off workers to improve their margins. French music streamer Deezer, citing improved cost control and margin improvement through more favorable terms with record labels, improved its first-half adjusted EBITDA by 8 million euros ($8.7 million). The company also raised its target for full-year adjusted EBITDA by 5 million euros ($5.4 million).
Reservoir Media, which reported earnings on Wednesday (July 31), similarly improved operational efficiency without layoffs. The company’s share price fell by 8.8% in the two days after it announced quarterly recorded music revenue had dropped 7%, but the company’s publishing revenue improved 15% overall revenue grew 8% and adjusted EBITDA soared 25%. While investors found reason for concern, CEO Golnar Khosrowshahi struck an optimistic note on Wednesday’s earnings call. “We’re off to a good start in fiscal 2025 and remain on track to again hit our annual targets,” she said.
In addition to cost-cutting, streaming companies are also enjoying the benefits of price increases. Not only did Spotify raise its subscriber count by 26 million in the previous 12 months, but price increases pushed average revenue per user (ARPU) up 8.2%, or 0.35 euros ($0.38), per month. Even though Deezer didn’t gain subscribers over the previous year, its ARPU rose 6% for direct subscribers and 3.5% for subscribers gained through partnerships due to price increases it instituted last year.
Of course, music companies have their share of challenges that cost-cutting can’t solve. Streamers can’t raise prices too frequently and are dealing with ongoing sluggishness in ad-supported streaming. Record labels need to re-set expectations for their subscription businesses and continue to see sluggish ad-supported streaming revenue. And music publishers are getting a pay cut from Spotify’s decision to treat its premium service like a bundle in the U.S. Considering all this, their decisions to cut costs and focus on operational efficiency couldn’t have come at a better time.
In March of 2023, as artificial intelligence barnstormed through the headlines, Goldman Sachs published a report on “the enormous economic potential of generative AI.” The writers explored the possibility of a “productivity boom,” comparable to those that followed seismic technological shifts like the mass adoption of personal computers.
Roughly 15 months later, Goldman Sachs published another paper on AI, this time with a sharply different tone. This one sported a blunt title — “Gen AI: Too Much Spend, Too Little Benefit?” — and it included harsh assessments from executives like Jim Covello, Goldman’s head of global equity research. “AI bulls seem to just trust that use cases will proliferate as the technology evolves,” Covello said. “But 18 months after the introduction of generative AI to the world, not one truly transformative — let alone cost-effective — application has been found.”
This skepticism has been echoed elsewhere. Daron Acemoglu, a prominent M.I.T. scholar, published a paper in May arguing that AI would lead to “much more modest productivity effects than most commentators and economists have claimed.” David Cahn, a partner at Sequoia Capital, warned in June that “we need to make sure not to believe in the delusion that has now spread from Silicon Valley to the rest of the country, and indeed the world. That delusion says that we’re all going to get rich quick.”
Trending on Billboard
“I’m worried that we’re getting this hype cycle going by measuring aspiration and calling it adoption,” says Kristina McElheran, an assistant professor of strategic management at the University of Toronto who recently published a paper examining businesses’ attempts to implement AI technology. “Use is harder than aspiration.”
The music industry is no exception. A recent survey of music producers conducted by Tracklib, a company that supplies artists with pre-cleared samples, found that 75% of producers said they’re not using AI to make music. Among the 25% who were playing around with the technology, the most common use cases were to help with highly technical and definitely unsexy processes: stem separation (73.9%) and mastering (45.5%). (“Currently, AI has shown the most promise in making existing processes — like coding — more efficient,” Covello noted in Goldman’s report.) Another multi-country survey published in May by the Reuters Institute found that just 3% of people have used AI for making audio.
At the moment, people use AI products “to do their homework or write their emails,” says Hanna Kahlert, a cultural trends analyst at MIDiA Research, which recently conducted its own survey about AI technology adoption. “But they aren’t interested in it as a creative solution.”
When it comes to assessing AI’s impact — and the speed with which it would remake every facet of society — some recalibration was probably inevitable. “Around the launch of ChatGPT, there was so much excitement and promise, especially because this is a technology that we talk about in pop culture and see in our movies and our TV shows,” says Manav Raj, an assistant professor of management at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, who studies firms’ responses to technological change. “It was really easy to start thinking about how it could be really transformative.”
“Some of that excitement might have been a little frothy,” he continues. “Even if this is a really important and big technology, it takes time for us to see the effects of these kinds of technological changes in markets.” This was famously true with the development of computers — in 1987, the economist Robert Solow joked, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics,” a phenomenon later dubbed “the productivity paradox.”
It also takes time to settle the legal and regulatory framework governing AI technologies, which will presumably influence the magnitude of their effects as well. Earlier this year, the major labels sued two genAI music platforms, Suno and Udio, accusing them of copyright infringement on a mass scale; in recently filed court documents, the companies said their activities were lawful under the doctrine of fair use, and that the major labels were just trying to eliminate “a threat to their market share.” Similar suits against AI companies have also been filed in other creative industries.
When McElheran surveyed manufacturing firms, however, few cited regulatory uncertainty as a barrier to AI use. She points out that “they may have had bigger fish to fry, like no use case.” A U.S. Census Bureau survey of businesses published in March found that 84.2% of respondents hadn’t used AI in the previous two weeks, and 80.9% of the firms that weren’t planning to implement AI in the next six months believe it “is not applicable to this business.”
Tracklib’s survey found something similar to McElheran’s. Only around 10% of respondents said concern about copyright was a reason they wouldn’t use AI tools. Instead, Tracklib’s results indicated that producers’ most common objections to using AI were moral, not legal — explanations like, “I want my art to be my own.”
“Generative AI comes up against this wall where it’s so easy, it’s just a push of a button,” Kahlert says. “It’s a fun gimmick, but there’s no real investment on the part of the user, so there’s not much value that they actually place in the outcome.”
In contrast, MIDiA’s survey found that respondents were interested in AI tech that can help them modify tracks by adjusting tempo — a popular TikTok alteration that can be done without AI — and customizing song lyrics. This interest was especially pronounced among younger music fans: Over a third of 20-to-24-year-olds were intrigued by AI tools that could help them play with tempo, and around 20% of that age group liked the idea of being able to personalize song lyrics.
Antony Demekhin, co-founder of the AI music company Tuney, sees a market for “creative tools” that enable “making, editing, or remixing beats and songs without using a complicated DAW, while still giving users a feeling of ownership over the output.”
“Up until recently,” he adds, “the addressable market for those kinds of tools has been small because the number of producers that use professional production software has been limited, so early-stage tech investors don’t frequently back stuff like that.”
Demekhin launched Tuney in 2020, well before the general public was thinking about products like ChatGPT. In the wake of that platform’s explosion, “Investors started throwing money around,” he recalls. At the same time, “nobody knew what questions to ask. What is this trained on? Are you exposed to legal risk? How easy would it be for Meta to replicate this and then make it available on Instagram?”
Today, investors are far better informed, and conversations with them sound very different, Demekhin says. “Cooler heads are prevailing,” he continues. “Now there’s going to be a whole wave of companies that make more sense because people have figured out where these technologies can be useful — and where they can’t.”
The never-ending legal battle between Journey members Jonathan Cain and Neal Schon erupted again this week, with Cain filing a new lawsuit against Schon over claims that his “exorbitant” spending is threatening to cripple the band’s touring operations.
In a complaint made public in Delaware court on Tuesday (July 30), Cain claimed that Schon’s alleged spending — including unilaterally chartering private jets and charging personal expenses to their shared American Express card — has led to a “deadlock” that must be resolved.
“The deadlock between the company’s directors is now interfering with the company’s ability to take even the most basic actions and is causing significant disruptions in the smooth operation of the company,” Cain’s lawyers write, adding that the problems “pose a severe threat of harm to the company and to Journey’s storied history of musical greatness.”
Trending on Billboard
Legal battles are nothing new for Schon and Cain, the two key remaining members of an iconic rock band that’s still printing money decades after its “Don’t Stop Believin’” heyday.
Back in 2022, Schon sued Cain over allegations that his bandmate had unfairly blocked his access to the Amex account, “interfering” with the band’s activities and delaying payments to crew members and vendors. A few months later, Cain sued him back — claiming he had placed those restrictions on the Amex to stop Schon from “misusing” the company card, including spending $400,000 in a single month.
The new case, filed in Delaware’s Chancery Court, largely rehashes those same disagreements over spending — like Cain claiming that Schon has “spent up to $10,000 per night for hotel rooms for him and his wife” during their most recent tour.
But in technical terms, the new case focuses narrowly on the governance of Freedom 2020 Inc., a Delaware-based corporate entity they created to operate Journey’s touring. Since Cain and Schon each control exactly 50% of the company, the lawsuit says the two have reached an impasse that has spilled into other aspects of the band’s operations, like managing their staffers.
“Petitioner and respondent are deadlocked with regard to issues concerning the hiring and firing of company employees and Band crew members,” Cain’s lawyers write in the lawsuit. “It is common that one director will terminate an employee or crew member, and hours or days later, the other director will rehire that same individual.”
The lawsuit claims the strife between Cain and Schon has also led to other problems, including disagreements about whether to accept an advance from AEG for their most recent tour, the purchase of cancellation insurance and other problems.
“The deadlock between petitioner and respondent has created a toxic internal environment,” Cain’s lawyers write. “Rather than focusing on the band’s performances during a major international tour, the band’s [members and crew] now find themselves caught in the middle of the directors’ disputes, afraid of performing their job responsibilities, and pressured to align with one director or another.”
As a solution, Cain is asking the court to appoint a neutral third director of the company, who will be able to “issue the tie-breaking vote” during disputes over key issues.
In a statement to Billboard, Cain’s attorney Sid Liebesman stressed that his client was not seeking damages and only wanted to to resolve the impasse: “It is expected that the third director will provide resolution to the issues between Jon and Neal,” Liebesman said. “It is Jon’s intent for Journey to continue providing great live music throughout the current tour.”
An attorney who has represented Schon in his previous litigation with Cain did not return a request for comment on Friday (Aug. 2).
Even before Schon and Cain came to blows, members of Journey had been sparring in court for years. Back in 2020, the two men teamed up to file a lawsuit against former drummer Steven Smith and former bassist Ross Valory over the band’s name. And in 2022, former lead singer Steve Perry took legal action to stop Schon and Cain from registering federal trademarks on the names of many of the band’s biggest hits.
A true champion for positive change in music will be honored at Billboard Canada Women in Music in Toronto on Sept. 7, 2024.
Jessie Reyez will accept the Trailblazer Award, which is given to a female artist who acts as a music industry pioneer by using her platform to spotlight unheard voices and break ground for future generations of performers.
The Canadian singer straddles the worlds of hip-hop, R&B and pop and has proven to be a big star both on and off stage. She’s hit the Billboard Hot 100 and Billboard Canadian Hot 100 multiple times, while also appearing on a number of other charts in genres including Latin, R&B and dance. She’s collaborated and toured with artists from Billie Eilish to Eminem to Big Sean to Sam Smith. She’s been a hitmaker behind the scenes, too, penning songs for artists including Calvin Harris and Dua Lipa.
On and offstage, Reyez has used her platform to speak up against systemic inequality — from lack of diversity on the staff of major labels to immigration issues to LGBTSQ+ rights.
Reyez was previously honored with the Impact Award at Billboard Women in Music in 2020, accepting during the virtual ceremony while speaking about the ways she’s had to break through barriers as a woman in music.
Trending on Billboard
“I’ve always said that being born a woman on this earth is like being born walking uphill,” she said. “There are so many burdens and bags that we carry and manage to do so with grace.”
Previous winners of the Trailblazer Award include Phoebe Bridgers, Kesha and Janelle Monae. Reyez will accept the award at the first edition of Billboard Women in Music in Canada.
The ceremony will also include guest of honor Alanis Morissette, who will win the Icon Award. The star-studded event will additionally celebrate previously announced honourees Allison Russell, LU Kala, The Beaches and more yet-to-be-announced.
For more on Billboard Canada Women in Music and to buy tickets for the September 7 event, head here. – Richard Trapunski
SiR’s Concert is Cancelled in Toronto, Fuelling Speculation about Drake’s Involvement
Another last-minute concert cancellation at History in Toronto is causing online speculation related to Drake‘s feud with Kendrick Lamar.
Los Angeles R&B singer SiR was set to perform at the venue on July 30 but announced on X (formerly Twitter) that the show has been canceled. The singer stated that the venue canceled the event even though, he says, the show was sold out. “Not sure why,” he tweeted.
ScHoolboy Q reacted with laughter to the news; the rapper’s July show at History was canceled earlier this month with no reason given, and at the time he took to the same platform to imply it was because of the feud between Lamar and Drake. History is a collaboration between Drake and Live Nation.
“CANADIAN POLICE DONT WANT NOBODY FROM TDE PERFORMING,” ScHoolboy wrote after his show’s cancellation. A spokesperson from the Toronto Police Service said it had no part in the decision to cancel the concert.
ScHoolboy Q and Lamar are former labelmates on Top Dawg Entertainment (TDE), which Lamar left last year, as well as former members of the group Black Hippy. SiR is also on the label and has collaborated with Lamar.
The SiR cancellation follows another Drake-related incident at History on Monday night (July 29). DJ Scheme, opening for Ski Mask The Slump God, dropped Lamar’s Drake diss track “Not Like Us” at the venue and shared a clip of the crowd singing along at full volume.
ScHoolboy Q, meanwhile, made a not-so-cryptic post on X shortly after, which simply read: “HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH 🔵.” His followers interpreted it as a reaction to the “Not Like Us” needle drop. – Rosie Long Decter
Céline Dion Sees Global Spike in Streams After Soaring Olympics Comeback
It’s all coming back to her now: Listeners are streaming Céline Dion in big numbers following a triumphant comeback performance.
The French Canadian superstar performed from the Eiffel Tower on July 26 as part of the Paris Olympics opening ceremony. Dion sang French icon Edith Piaf‘s “L’Hymne à l’amour,” making an emotional and highly-anticipated return to the stage amidst a battle with Stiff Person Syndrome.
Viewers tuned in across the globe to see Dion’s performance, and they clearly want more. Her global Spotify listenership has jumped 36% since the performance, with a 64% jump in France.
Dion isn’t the only artist whose catalogue is benefitting from the performance. The original recording of “L’Hymne à l’amour” by Piaf saw a 317% jump in Spotify streams in the day after the opening ceremony.
The big bump in listeners indicates that the public is ready and waiting for Dion’s return. Though she hasn’t confirmed a follow-up performance, there have been rumours of a potential Las Vegas show on the horizon.
The performance also followed the June release of a documentary chronicling Dion’s experiences with Stiff Person Syndrome, I Am: Céline Dion.
She shared a message on Instagram after the performance for the athletes in Paris: “stay focused, keep going, my heart is with you!” After everything she’s been through, her heart goes on. – RLD