State Champ Radio

by DJ Frosty

Current track

Title

Artist

Current show
blank

State Champ Radio Mix

12:00 am 12:00 pm

Current show
blank

State Champ Radio Mix

12:00 am 12:00 pm


Business

Page: 19

Conjunto Michoacan, the veteran Regional Mexican group known for its ranchera and norteño ballads, released “El Corrido de Fernando Valenzuela,” about the late star Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Fernando Valenzuela, in 1981. But the group didn’t do it because everybody was doing it — even though, in the early ’80s, everybody was. “We knew of a few other songs, but were not really inspired by them, because we were focused on what we were doing,” recalls Alejandro Saucedo Garcia, the group’s violinist for 40 years. “He was the king of baseball and everybody in Mexico loved him.” 
“El Corrido de Fernando Valenzuela,” the group’s 1981 single, was one of many musical tributes that dominated Mexico and Los Angeles while “El Toro” was racking up hundreds of strikeouts and winning in the World Series. Among the most popular were upbeat salsa-and-disco jam “Go Fernando” by Everardo y Su Flota, a Chicago group whose bandleader died in 2014, and “Cumbia de Fernando Valenzuela,” a more traditional, name-chanting ballad by Los Gatos Negros de Tiberio.

Trending on Billboard

Conjunto Michoacan, one of the few surviving groups that dipped into Fernandomania at the time, had a songwriter, the late Magdaleno Oliva, who knew Valenzuela well. “They would have conversations about baseball and stuff,” Saucedo Garcia recalls, through a translator, by phone from his home in Taretan, Michoacán, Mexico. “The song was very famous,” he adds. “On the radio all over the place. We toured in Mexico and the U.S. and played the song.”

Valenzuela, who died last week at 63, was born in a small Mexican town, Etchohuaquila, Sonora, before becoming the only baseball pitcher ever to win the Cy Young and Rookie of the Year awards in the same season. He was magnetic and dominant and a sort of folk hero to Latino baseball fans, particularly those with Mexican heritage. Still outraged about Dodger Stadium displacing a heavily Latino Los Angeles community called Chavez Ravine in the ’60s to bring baseball to the city, many local Hispanics plunged into Fernandomania.

“My parents, right away, you know, they started crying. We all cried,” Sergio Juarez, a baseball fan who grew up near Dodger Stadium, recently told NBC Los Angeles. “It was different because Fernando looked like us. Fernando was someone that was humble, and he broke barriers that a lot of people wouldn’t even reach.

“And to see a person that had a Spanish surname, Mexican-American, came from a small town,” he added. “It was very special.”

Corridos represent a 200-year-old tradition of story-songs that frequently deal with David-vs.-Goliath-type battles of lone heroes taking on institutions; they were an adaptable way of saluting Valenzuela in the ’80s. In a Los Angeles Times essay after the Dodgers retired Valenzuela’s No. 34, Michael Jamie-Becerra, a University of California Riverside assistant professor of creative writing, wrote that Conjunto Michoacan’s track “would have you believe that Fernando’s on-field success could be attributed to his having a noble heart, caring for his parents and being an all-around good guy.”

Conjunto Michoacan recorded “El Corrido de Fernando Valenzuela” for Odeon Records, an imprint owned by major label EMI that is now part of the University of California Los Angeles’ Strachwitz Frontera Collection of Mexican and Mexican American Recordings. Although the track has only 1,087 YouTube views and is not available on most streaming services, Conjunto Michoacan has recently played it live throughout the U.S. and Mexico. Its fans include the Guatemalan YouTube commenter who posted that he listened to the group’s music “when I went to herd sheep in the field with my radio with pure rayobac batteries.”

Saucedo Garcia says the group plans to release a new version of “El Corrido de Fernando Valenzuela” with updated lyrics and perform it on upcoming tours. “New things about his achievements and his passing,” he says.

The 65-year-old violinist continues to follow baseball, including the World Series, in which the Dodgers have a 3-0 lead over the New York Yankees. He has a rooting interest: “I would like the winners to be the team of Fernando Valenzuela,” he says.

DannyLux is expanding his management team, Billboard can confirm. The Mexican American singer-songwriter adds D Luna Music to VPS Music — his home label since launching his career in 2020 — in a new partnership. Under the leadership of José Luis Aguilar (VPS) Daniel Luna (D Luna), the deal “aims to elevate the artist to new […]

On Friday evening, almost two years after Tory Lanez was convicted of shooting Megan Thee Stallion, posts on X (formerly Twitter) blared stunning “news” about the case: that a California appeals court had “found Tory Lanez to be innocent” and would “reinvestigate” the case to see if he was “unfairly prosecuted.”
The claims, which appear to have first been posted by an account called Akademiks TV run by the popular blogger and podcaster DJ Akademiks, came with a screenshot of an official-looking document signed by three judges. Numerous commenters celebrated that the singer had seemingly been vindicated.

Just one problem: That’s not at all what happened.

Trending on Billboard

Instead, the appeals court merely issued a procedural order acknowledging that it had received a new petition from Lanez’s legal team and would consider it alongside his other appeals. That’s all that occurred – something that was obvious to anyone who actually read the document. Lanez challenges to the conviction remains pending, and they continue to face long odds for success.

With a false story circulating, the internet quickly swung into gear. Meghann Cuniff, a popular legal journalist who has closely covered the Lanez case, blasted the posts for “spreading lies.” The X account Bad Legal Takes, which highlights examples of misinformed legal reasoning, featured an image of the Akademiks post. X’s own platform later added “community notes” to some versions, stating that such claims were false.

But as with many instances of misinformation on the modern internet, some damage was likely already done. Though Akademiks TV eventually deleted its post, it was likely seen by thousands. A later post from an account called Daily Loud, featuring the same claim and the same screenshot, is still live on the site as of Tuesday and has currently racked up 5.1 million views.

In an interview with Billboard on Monday, Megan Thee Stallion’s attorney Alex Spiro sharply criticized the social media accounts that shared the story, saying they “make a living out of complete nonsense” and that “they’re going to face consequences.”

“This appeal when it is eventually heard will be denied, so all [Lanez] can do is gaslight and spin off these nonsense bloggers from inside custody, where he will remain,” Spiro said. “We are taking legal action. Stay tuned.”

Spiro declined to comment on who exactly would face legal action or what such action would look like. Akademiks TV did not immediately return a direct message on X seeking comment.

Lanez (Daystar Peterson) was convicted in December 2022 on three felony counts over the violent 2020 incident, in which he shot at the feet of Megan (real name Megan Pete) during an argument following a pool party at Kylie Jenner’s house in the Hollywood Hills. According to prosecutors, when Megan got out of the vehicle and began walking away, Lanez shouted “Dance, bitch!” and fired a gun at her feet. In August 2023, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Lanez has appealed his convictions to California’s Court of Appeal, arguing that the judge allowed improper testimony and evidence, resulting in a “a miscarriage of justice.” He’s also filed a so-called petition for writ of habeas corpus, a more drastic legal method for challenging a criminal conviction.

Last week’s false news stories came after Lanez filed yet another habeas corpus petition on Oct. 23. According to a copy of the filing obtained by Billboard, Lanez’s lawyers say the gun used in the shooting and bullet fragments that doctors removed from Megan’s foot have not been made available to him, meaning he “does not have the ability to conduct a full investigation.”

On Monday, Spiro directly rebutted the claims made in the new petition, saying he had confirmed with prosecutors that Lanez’s team was still able to access the evidence. “The statement that the gun and magazine are not available for testing is a complete and demonstrable lie,” Spiro said. “They are sitting there and available any time.”

After Lanez’s lawyers filed the new petition, the appeals court issued a brief order on Friday alerting the parties that it had “read and considered the petition” and that the new habeas challenge would be “considered together” along with the earlier appeals. Such a scheduling order was unremarkable, and was in no way a substantive ruling on the merits of Lanez’s arguments.

It was a screenshot of this order that was included in the false stories that circulated on social media. This was despite the fact that the order made no mention of “innocence,” and even expressly ordered prosecutors to file their own response brief in the weeks ahead – another clear sign that it was a procedural order, not a decision on the case.

Part of the confusion might have stemmed from the way Lanez’s attorneys announced the order. In an Instagram post on Friday, his lawyers at the group Unite The People posted a screenshot of the order under a caption that said the appeals court had just “ACCEPTED TORY LANEZ ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIM!!!” That statement was seemingly a reference to the legal term “actual innocence,” a form of criminal defense that they advanced in their petition.

A short time after Unite The People’s post, the tweet from Akademiks TV claiming Lanez had been ruled “innocent” appeared on X, featuring the same image with a watermark reading “United The People Inc.” Lanez’s lawyers, Crystal Morgan and Michael Hayden, did not return a request for comment on Tuesday.

The South by Southwest Music Festival has announced the first group of showcasing artists for its 39th annual event, scheduled for March 10-15 in Austin, Texas. Known for fostering discovery among fans and industry pros, the festival will feature an eclectic lineup from across the globe.

Explore

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Organizers today (Oct. 29) announced over a hundred new and established acts that will perform across Austin next March, including UK pop duo The Ting Tings, regional Mexican singer Justin Morales, Dublin punk band Gurriers, Indonesian psychedelic funk group Ali, Montreal art-punk ensemble La Sécurité, Australian rock band Delivery and indie pop artist Twin Shadow, who’ll debut his sixth album Georgie at the event.

“This announcement is an excellent teaser for what you can expect to see at SXSW 2025,” said James Minor, VP of Music Festival. “This round includes a range of exceptional artists, from up and coming talent to established legends, and everywhere in between. If you’ve been to SXSW before, you’ll know that this list is more than an eclectic playlist; it’s a guide to discovery, and your first step toward what you’ll experience in March.”

Trending on Billboard

The festival’s global scope is reflected in its artist selection (see the full list below), with acts representing countries such as Argentina, Canada, Denmark, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, and Norway. Showcases are curated with industry collaborators, including record labels, booking agencies, and media outlets like ATC Live, Billboard, Rolling Stone, Deezer, Music From Ireland and Sofar Sounds, among others, offering attendees exclusive, small-stage performances.

Founded in 1987 in Austin, SXSW has grown to encompass tech, film and TV, music, education and culture. The festival has also expanded to include SXSW Sydney and SXSW London, making it a key event for the global creative community.The entirety of the 2025 conference and festival will run from March 10-15.

In 2021, SXSW signed a “lifeline” deal with P-MRC, a joint venture between Penske Media Corporation and MRC, making P-MRC a stakeholder and long-term partner with the Austin festival. P-MRC is the parent company of Billboard.

The first round of SXSW 2025 artists invited to perform include

Ali (Jakarta INDONESIA)Amiture (New York NY)Annie-Claude Deschênes (Montreal CANADA)Ava Vegas (Los Angeles CA)babas tutsipop (Guadalajara MEXICO)Bakers Eddy (Wellington NEW ZEALAND)Bee Blackwell (Austin TX)Big Phony (New York NY)Bleary Eyed (Philadelphia PA)Boo Seeka (Dudley AUSTRALIA)Bubba Lucky (Austin TX)Bummer Camp (New York NY)Caleb De Casper (Austin TX)Cap Carter (Sydney AUSTRALIA)Cari Cari (Vienna AUSTRIA)Carter Vail (Los Angeles CA)CDSM (Atlanta GA)Chinese American Bear (Seattle WA)Cloth (Glasgow UK-SCOTLAND)corto.alto (Glasgow UK-SCOTLAND)Cotton Mather (Austin TX)Delivery (Melbourne AUSTRALIA)Dr. Pushkin (Bolgatanga GHANA)Dune Rats (Brisbane AUSTRALIA)Edgar Alejandro (Guadalajara MÉXICO)Ellur (Halifax UK-ENGLAND)Emmeline (London UK-ENGLAND)Exotic Fruitica (Austin TX)Fake Dad (Los Angeles CA)fantasy of a broken heart (Brooklyn NY)Frankie Venter (Mount Manganui NEW ZEALAND)GEOGRAPHER (San Francisco CA)Graham Reynolds (Austin TX)Guardian Singles (Auckland NEW ZEALAND)Gurriers (Dublin IRELAND)Gus Englehorn (Maui HI)Hachiku (Melbourne AUSTRALIA)HIMALAYAS (CARDIFF UK-WALES)Honeyglaze (London UK-ENGLAND)Housewife (Toronto CANADA)J.Tajor (Melbourne AUSTRALIA)Jad Fair and the Placebos (Austin TX)John Francis Flynn (Dublin IRELAND)Julie Nolen (Austin TX)Justin Morales (Cuernavaca MEXICO)Kanaan (Oslo NORWAY)KAP BAMBINO (Bordeaux FRANCE)Ki! (Copenhagen DENMARK)Kombilesa Mi (Palenque COLOMBIA)La Sécurité (Montréal CANADA)Laura Lee & the Jettes (Berlin GERMANY)Lauren Lakis (Austin TX)Letting Up Despite Great Faults (Austin TX)Levin Goes Lightly (Stuttgart GERMANY)Los Eclipses (Mexico City MEXICO)Lucy Sugerman (Canberra AUSTRALIA)MADELEINE (London UK-ENGLAND)Mall Girl (Oslo NORWAY)Man/Woman/Chainsaw (London UK-ENGLAND)Marry Cherry (Austin TX)Maruja (Manchester UK-ENGLAND)mary in the junkyard (London UK-ENGLAND)MatchingOutfits(BerlinGERMANY)MELLT (Cardiff UK-WALES)Meltheads (Antwerp BELGIUM)Mhaol (Dublin IRELAND)Midnight Navy (Austin TX)Miranda and the Beat (New Orleans LA)Monobloc(NewYork NY)Nanocluster [Immersion | SUSS] (Brighton UK-ENGLAND)Nature TV (Brighton UK-ENGLAND)Nemegata (Austin TX)Nilipek. (Istanbul TURKEY)Nive Nielsen (Nuuk GREENLAND)o’summer vacation (Kobe JAPAN)Parker Woodland (Austin TX)Paula Prieto (Buenos Aires ARGENTINA)Perennial (Vernon CT)Personal Trainer (Amsterdam NETHERLANDS)Pug Johnson (Beaumont TX)Quiet Money Dot (Houston TX)Really Good Time (Dublin IRELAND)Rowena Wise (Melbourne AUSTRALIA)Sarah Klang (Gothenburg SWEDEN)Scarlet House (Charlotte NC)Shao Dow (London UK-ENGLAND)Shiho Yabuki (Hadasu JAPAN)Shishi (Vilnius LITHUANIA)Sir Jude (Melbourne AUSTRALIA)Sly5thAve (Austin TX)SodaBlonde(Dublin IRELAND)Sofia Grant (London UK-ENGLAND)Sultanes del Yonke (El Paso TX)SummerPearl(LondonUK-ENGLAND)Surely Shirley (Kiama AUSTRALIA)Susobrino (Brussel BELGIUM)TesfayeTayeGebeyehu/YahoEthiopian Cultural Band/ (Addis Ababa ETHIOPIA)The Philharmonik (Sacramento CA)The Ting Tings (Manchester UK-ENGLAND)The VANNS (Wollongong AUSTRALIA)tiger bae (Harumi JAPAN)TVOD (Brooklyn NY)Twin Shadow (Los Angeles CA)twst (Barry UK-WALES)Vanessa Zamora (San Diego CA)Venus Grrrls (Leeds UK-ENGLAND)Volcan (San Antonio TX)Vv Pete (Sydney AUSTRALIA)Water Damage (Austin TX)Woomb (Sofia BULGARIA)XAMIYA (Tokyo JAPAN)Xixa (Tucson AZ)Yasmin Williams (Woodbridge VA)Yndling (Bergen NORWAY)Yoo Doo Right (Montreal CANADA)Yuuf (London UK-ENGLAND

You can acquaint yourself with the artists who’ll be performing at SXSW 2025 by subscribing to the official SXSW Spotify and YouTube Music Video playlists. 

Dick Clark Productions (DCP) has announced the appointment of Diana Miller as executive vice president of talent, effective Jan. 15, 2025.
In her new role, Miller will lead the talent team and oversee talent booking and management for DCP’s iconic lineup of live events and shows, including the Golden Globes, American Music Awards, Billboard Music Awards, Academy of Country Music Awards, and Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve with Ryan Seacrest. Miller will report directly to DCP CEO Jay Penske and be based in Los Angeles.

“Diana’s exceptional background, deep relationships and passion for entertainment make her an ideal fit for our team,” said Penske. “Her innovative and outside-of-the-box approach will be key as we continue to expand and enhance our programming and global reach.”

Miller, a six-time Emmy Award-winning producer and two-time Billboard Women in Music Award honoree, brings over 20 years of experience in booking celebrity interviews and musical performances, with a career spanning major networks like CBS, NBC, Apple TV, and TBS.

Trending on Billboard

“I’m thrilled to join DCP, a company I’ve long admired for its rich history and slate of incredible shows”, said Miller. “I’m also excited to be part of DCP’s bright future and vision with Jay at the helm and look forward to shaping compelling, unique and memorable opportunities for talent for years to come.”

She has worked with high-profile figures, including Michelle Obama, Paul McCartney, Ariana Grande and Jay-Z, establishing a reputation for strong industry relationships and creative talent engagement.

Miller’s background includes eight years as supervising producer of The Late Late Show with James Corden, where she played a key role in launching Carpool Karaoke, as well as seven years as producer for Carpool Karaoke: The Series on Apple TV. She also spent seven years as senior talent executive on Last Call with Carson Daly and NBC’s New Year’s Eve special and is currently the senior supervising producer for The Talk.

Duetti, a fintech platform that lends money to independent artists in exchange for stakes in their back catalogs, said Tuesday it secured $114 million from investors led by Create Music Group-backer Flexpoint Ford.
Co-founded by former Tidal COO Lior Tibon and former Apple Music business development executive Christopher Nolte in 2023, Duetti is the latest company in the indie music sector to capitalize on the flood of financing and interest coming from institutional investors and private equity firms.

Duetti said it raised $34 million in an equity financing from Flexpoint Ford, Nyca Partners and Viola Ventures. Chicago-based Flexpoint Ford invested $165 million in Create Music Group earlier this year. Duetti also secured $80 million through a privately rated asset-backed security, structured and placed by Barclays.

Trending on Billboard

This is Duetti’s second publicly-disclosed fundraise — last year it raised $32 million from investors including Roc Nation, Viola Ventures and Presight Capital — and its first ABS. Duetti chief executive Tibon described the combination of equity investments and ABS financing as more efficient, and said in a statement that it will help them to “accelerate [the company’s] acquisition of music catalogs and expand its proprietary forecasting, pricing, sourcing, and marketing technology.”

“We believe we are leading the way in educating the capital markets on the significant long-term value of the independent music sector,” said Tibon. “The number of independent artists is growing at an unprecedented rate, and Duetti is here to ensure they have access to differentiated financing solutions.”

Duetti says it works with 500-plus artists, including MC Delux, SadBoyProlific and Savannah Dexter, purchasing their tracks or entire master catalogs, in exchange for funds that typically range from $10,000 to $3 million. Through digital marketing campaigns like playlists and channels on Spotify and YouTube, along with traditional sync placements and better distribution, Duetti says it helps artists grow their audience, thereby generating more streaming revenue and a profit for their investors.

Flexpoint Ford managing director Mike Morris called Duetti one of the fastest growing rights music rights companies in recent years.

“We see tremendous potential in their ability to provide scalable, data-backed solutions that address the evolving needs of musicians today,” Morris said in a statement.

ByteDance founder Zhang Yiming tops the list of China’s richest people, according to the Hurun Research Institute, although many of them have seen their net worth plunge over the past year.
The institute, which publishes the annual Hurun China Rich List, found that the total wealth of entrepreneurs on the list this year was $3 trillion, down 10% from the previous year.

The number of billionaires based on their net worth in U.S. dollars was also down 142, to 753. Hurun tallied 1,185 billionaires since 2021.

“The Hurun China Rich List has shrunk for an unprecedented third year running, as China’s economy and stock markets had a difficult year,” said Rupert Hoogewerf, chairman and chief researcher of the Hurun report.

Trending on Billboard

ByteDance’s Zhang came in No. 1 for the first time this year, with a net worth of $49.3 billion, according to Hurun. ByteDance, which is the parent company of popular short-video platforms Douyin and TikTok, saw its revenue grow to $110 billion last year.

He is also the first individual born in the 1980s to top the Hurun list.

Bottled water magnate Zhong Shanshan fell to second place in 2024 with $47.9 billion, after his brand Nongfu Spring faced backlash in February when consumers accused it of disloyalty to China due to designs of its bottles.

The backlash wiped out billions in market value for Nongfu Spring.

Coming in third is Tencent founder Pony Ma with a net worth of $44.4 billion, as the gaming firm saw its revenues rise.

This year’s China Rich List had just 54 new names added to the list, the lowest figure in two decades. New additions include Charlwin Mao and Miranda Qu Fang, the founders of Xiaohongshu, a social media and lifestyle platform popular with young users.

China’s economy has lagged in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic as the country grapples with a real estate crisis and a volatile stock market. Policymakers are expected to unveil major stimulus measures to encourage consumption and spending, which have declined in recent months.

In 2010, Damien Shields, then 22, was reloading the official Michael Jackson website repeatedly from his home in Australia, anxiously awaiting the arrival of the heavily hyped unreleased track “Breaking News.” When it arrived, he was disappointed — then angry. He believed that the King of Pop, who died June 25, 2009, wasn’t singing on the song. It was an imposter. “I was outraged, the same as thousands of other fans,” Shields says. “But unlike those other fans, I wanted to do something about it.”
That moment led to a 14-year, DIY investigative journalism project, involving expensive trips to interview Jackson’s nephew Taryll Jackson in Los Angeles and scour the archives of the U.S. Copyright Office in Washington, D.C. Originally intended to be a book, Shields’ new, 12-part podcast, Faking Michael, which is available on major podcast platforms, is the “untold story of the biggest fraud in music,” he says.

Trending on Billboard

The “true-crime podcast,” as Shields calls it, was inspired by NPR’s Serial and makes a methodical case that two producers and Jackson friends, Eddie Cascio and James Porte, faked the vocals on “Breaking News,” “Monster” and “Keep Your Head Up” and hoodwinked Jackson’s estate and longtime label Sony Music. In 2010, the estate made a deal potentially worth $250 million with Sony for 10 albums, including deluxe reissues of previous Jackson albums and new and unreleased material. Shields argues, however, that the estate was under pressure to provide new tracks and made a deal with Cascio and Porte, whom Shields accuses of employing an imposter singer named Jason Malachi.

According to Faking Michael, when superproducer Teddy Riley and Taryll began postproduction on the tracks in August 2010, Taryll concluded his late uncle’s vocals weren’t on the songs and complained on social media. The podcast also reports that the estate asked producers for their expert opinions but ignored their feedback and released the tracks anyway in December 2010.

Damien Shields

Calika

After fans filed a class-action suit against the estate and Sony, the parties settled in an undisclosed agreement in 2022. Earlier, the label had pulled the three disputed tracks from the 2010 album Michael. A Sony representative declined to comment, and a rep for Jackson’s estate did not respond to requests for comment; an attorney who represented Cascio and Porte in the suit did not respond to requests for comment. But Shields, now 36, discussed Faking Michael by Zoom from Australia.

What should listeners take away from your podcast?

This is art forgery.

How did you fund all this research?

It’s self-funded. When I started taking this seriously and traveling overseas, it was very difficult. I was working a minimum wage-type job at a marketing firm and didn’t have any money. I would save up, then go on a trip, do my research and come back totally broke, then save up and do it all again. In 2017, I left my job to work on this full time. To fund that, I started driving ride-share. One of the interviews I did was with Teddy Riley’s manager, Lawanda [Lane]. [According to the podcast, Riley, who had worked with Jackson, received $50,000 per track for Michael, including the Cascio-Porte material.] I’d been trying to get Lawanda for 11 years. She texted me at two in the morning Australian time: “Hey, Damien, I’m ready to talk.” I said, “Now?” She said, “I can be ready in 10 minutes.” So I switched off my ride-share app, drove home and interviewed her for four-and-a-half hours. That’s one of the cornerstone interviews.

The podcast suggests Sony and the estate made the deal with Cascio and Porte because they were desperate to release unheard Jackson music immediately after his death. How did they fall for this?

There were stipulations in the deal that you will release X amount of songs on Y amount of projects over Z amount of years. When the estate was coming into the problem with the vocals and people were telling them, “Well, this is not Michael,” they had to weigh that with “What implication would there be of releasing it anyway?” compared to the implication of breaking the contract.

Why do you think the estate was so desperate for unreleased Jackson material during this period?

The material Michael worked on in the final years of his life — he didn’t really do anything [with it]. He worked with [singer] Akon for two or three years, and he did a verse and some ad-libs on a duet. He worked with [producer] RedOne for two years. RedOne thinks he had one song that could possibly be released, but it would have to be “We Are the World” style, with multiple artists, because he didn’t have enough with Michael. [The estate] wanted final-year songs [from 2009]. They couldn’t do it, because there weren’t final-year songs. And the Cascio tracks were [allegedly] final-year songs.

You air snippets of recorded music, including songs that appeared on Michael and unreleased studio recordings. Did you have to clear them with the estate and Sony?

A lot of the material Cascio and Porte turned over to Sony leaked online in the spring of 2015. [It’s unclear who was responsible for the leak.] The source materials were out there on the internet. You’ve got to let listeners hear it, but you’ve got to respect fair-use copyright guidelines. [The recordings are] only used when I’m talking about something to prove my case. Ethics are at the top of my list.

And you don’t want Jackson estate co-executor John Branca coming after you.

I hope that John Branca will appreciate this. As much as it makes the estate look foolish, it does demonstrate that they were the victim of fraud. The estate should be listening to this and going, “We have to contact the authorities.”

Have you heard from Cascio or Porte or anyone from the estate or Sony?

No. We haven’t had any blowback or pushback from people who are depicted in it. Even though we are talking about something that I consider to be the greatest fraud in music history, I made a very conscious effort to not attack anyone’s character. The actions speak for themselves.

What’s next?

I want to get a good night’s sleep!

Ticketmaster plans to cancel roughly 50,000 resale tickets to Oasis’ U.K. reunion concerts over violations of the company’s terms and services, Billboard has confirmed. According to Ticketmaster, the canceled tickets were purchased using techniques that have been forbidden for the Oasis tour. Those include a prohibition on purchasing more than four tickets per household, per […]

Beyoncé’s attorneys are once again asking federal regulators to register Blue Ivy Carter’s name as a trademark, more than 12 years after she and Jay-Z first sought to lock up the intellectual property rights to their daughter’s name.
In a motion filed last week at the federal trademark office, lawyers for Beyoncé’s company pushed back on a ruling earlier this year that consumers might confuse the name with another Blue Ivy: a single-store clothing boutique in Wisconsin that has used the name since before the young Carter was born.

The star’s lawyers say that ruling should be overturned, arguing that nobody is going to confuse Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s daughter — once dubbed the “most famous baby in the world” — with a small clothing shop.

Trending on Billboard

“No reasonable consumer would ever suffer any form of confusion when encountering the [store’s] logo, which is used with one small shop in Fish Creek, Wisconsin, an unincorporated community with a population of approximately 997 people,” Beyoncé’s attorneys write. “Nor would a reasonable consumer encounter the ‘Blue Ivy Carter’ mark and conclude that the famous Carter family had teamed up with a small shop in rural Wisconsin to launch a clothing line.”

An attorney for Beyoncé’s company did not immediately return a request for comment on the status of the trademark case.

Just weeks after Blue Ivy was born in January 2012, Beyoncé’s BGK Trademark Holdings LLC applied at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register her unusual name as a trademark. The move raised eyebrows at the time, as fans wondered if the couple was commercializing their daughter. But Jay-Z later told Vanity Fair that they merely wanted to prevent her name from being exploited by others.

“People wanted to make products based on our child’s name, and you don’t want anybody trying to benefit off your baby’s name,” he told the magazine in 2013. “It wasn’t for us to do anything; as you see, we haven’t done anything.”

More than 12 years later, however, Blue Ivy’s parents have yet to secure that trademark registration.

For years, the process was bogged down in legal disputes with a woman named Veronica Morales, who runs a lifestyle event planning company under the name “Blue Ivy” and secured her own trademark to it. In 2020, a tribunal at the USPTO rejected Morales’ complaints, ruling that the two sides’ respective offerings were “so dissimilar that confusion is unlikely.”

That ruling seemingly cleared the way for the “Blue Ivy Carter” trademark registration to finally be issued. But attorneys for BGK never moved that application forward, and eventually, the USPTO deemed the application abandoned last year.

In November 2023, Beyoncé’s attorneys applied yet again for the same trademark registration. Like previous efforts, however, the new application quickly hit a roadblock: In April, a trademark examiner issued a tentative ruling that the mark was “confusingly similar” to the name of the Wisconsin clothing store, which has owned a trademark registration on its “Blue Ivy” logo since 2011.

(The Wisconsin boutique itself is not actually involved in the case and has not filed an opposition to the Blue Ivy Carter trademark; instead, the USPTO simply cited the earlier trademark as a reason to deny Beyoncé’s application.)

It was this tentative denial that Beyoncé’s attorneys challenged last week, arguing that Americans know who Blue Ivy Carter is and would never think she was “somehow connected to a lovely boutique shop in a small town in rural Wisconsin.”

“Since the moment she was born, she has resided in the American public’s conscience and thus … the consuming public would associate her with a trademark bearing her name,” BGK’s lawyers write. “The parties each exist and thrive in their own separate worlds and can continue doing so into the future.”