State Champ Radio

by DJ Frosty

Current track

Title

Artist

Current show

G-MIX

7:00 pm 8:00 pm

Current show

G-MIX

7:00 pm 8:00 pm


Blog

Page: 108

Chi Ossé, the son of late broadcaster and attorney Reggie Ossé, is currently a New York city councilman who is aiming his efforts to challenge Rep. Hakeem Jeffries for the incumbent’s congressional seat. However, it appears that Chi Ossé’s political ambitions are clashing with those of New York Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani.

As reported by the New York Times, it appears that Chi Ossé, 27, is politically aligned with Mamdani. The young councilman’s desire to take on the top Democrat in the House of Representatives presents an issue of concern for the incoming mayor. Thus far, Mamdani has not thrown his support behind Ossé, who is aware that top Democratic Party officials are expressing “concern” regarding the front-facing individuals on that side of the aisle.

The outlet says that Mamdani has tried suggesting Ossé take another path and not run against the popular Jeffries, signaling possible fracturing within the party ranks on how to best move forward with the mayor-elect’s political aims and agendas. Jeffries, who presides over the Eighth congressional district, has held the seat for over 11 years. Jeffries is also the House Minority Leader and a fierce opponent of President Donald Trump’s policies.

The Times also shared that Ossé’s stance moved Mamdani’s team to not invite the councilman to an election night watch party, according to sources, despite campaigning for Mamdani. Should Chi Ossé move forward with his plans to challenge Jeffries, it has the potential to spark a tense race in the upcoming primary vote in June 2026.

Photo: Getty

Source: @6ix9ine / Instagram
The king troll has crossed the line.

Recently, Tekashi 6ix9ine made a disgusting comment about singer Demi Lovato. The New Mexico artist has been open about her struggle with addiction. Back in 2018, Lovato overdosed on heroin laced with fentanyl. Since then, she has tried to keep a narrow path. Tekashi, on a podcast, recently spoke about the nostalgic show iCarly and mentioned Demi, “Remember iCarly? She does drugs now.” The host tries to clean up the comment, saying she believes Lovato is currently clean from drugs. 6ix9ine insists it will not be for long, “She’s gonna relapse, let’s send her a gift.”

Insisting that he planned to drop off a gift of drugs for her.
Fans online instantly roasted 6ix9ine for the uncalled-for comments about Demi Lovato. The NY struggle rapper has always made headlines for his comments, but this one takes the cake.

6ix9ine is also facing potential prison time for violating his probation stemming from his 2019 RICO case. His attorney, Lance Lazzaro, is pushing for house arrest instead, as the rapper is currently facing three months behind bars. Lazzaro argued that serving more time in prison would be “much more severe, difficult, and even dangerous” for 6ix9ine.
Check out how users reacted to Tekashi 6ix9ine’s comments about Demi Lovato’s struggle with addiction below.

2. Fans react to 6ix9ine’s comments

3. Users online remind Tekashi to be humble

4. TikTok User breaks down the process of recovery and how it should never be used as a joke

5. Some call 6ix9ine’s comments disgusting

6. More TikTok reactions

8. Social media is roasting Teksahi right now

10. 6ix9ine has to hold this L…

Trending on Billboard

The nominations for the upcoming 68th Annual Grammy Awards were announced on Friday (Nov. 7) — giving us three months before the Feb. 1 awards to debate who will win, who will get shut out, and who was unduly snubbed altogether.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

The most frequently called name for the nominations unsurprisingly belonged to Kendrick Lamar, who was already a big winner at the 2025 awards for his “Not Like Us,” and has nine nominations for 2026, most for his massively successful GNX album and its singles “Luther” and “TV Off.” Artists right behind Lamar include Lady Gaga, with seven nominations, and Bad Bunny and Sabrina Carpenter with six nominations — with all four artists competing in each of the album, record and song of the year categories.

How’d the Recording Academy do with capturing the year that was in this crop of nominees? And in what areas does it still need work? Billboard staffers discuss these questions and more below.

1. On a scale of 1-10, how well would you say the 2026 Grammy nominations did at capturing the best and brightest from the past year in music?

Katie Atkinson: 8. Honestly, it feels like there is far less to debate than in previous years. The conversations I’ve been having following the nominations have been more nitpicky than anything else — like, why “Golden” for song of the year but not record? And why “The Subway” for record but not song? (The reality is, both deserve recognition, wherever they’re placed.) There also aren’t really any eyebrow-raising inclusions in the big four like previous years. It’s pretty refreshing overall!

Eric Renner Brown: 8. Do I wish that MJ Lenderman, last year’s biggest indie-rock breakout, had scored a nomination (or several) with his September 2024 album Manning Fireworks? Of course. But generally – and realistically – speaking, the Grammys delivered a respectable slate of nominees for the 2026 awards. The major categories recognize a wide swath of acclaimed mainstream artists, and the genre categories are solid surveys of their respective types of music (even if I can’t help but laugh at Haim vying against four hard-rock groups for best rock album). Also refreshing: for a third straight year, the Grammys didn’t nominate a deluxe edition of an album for album of the year, which it did several times from 2020 to 2022.

Kyle Denis: Honestly, a solid 8. Virtually every star who had a true breakthrough over the past year appears on the final nominations list — but a complete shutout for Ravyn Lenae and “Love Me Not” is absolutely inexcusable. It’s also a shame that BigXThaPlug didn’t get any looks. 

Paul Grein: I give them an 8.5. The nominations hit just about all the right notes, expect for overlooking one key genre yet again. We’ll get to that.

Andrew Unterberger: At the risk of being boring, an 8 sounds about right. This was the first year in recent memory where none of the nominees in the big four categories set off a hearty round of guffaws across my various chats and social media feeds. Even the nominations I strongly disagree with I can’t say I was terribly surprised by. Really, the biggest complaint you could have about these nominees is that they were perhaps a bit too predictable.

2. Which artist or work’s omission from one or all of the big four categories did you find the most surprising?

Katie Atkinson: Surprising but not unwelcome: I definitely expected Alex Warren’s “Ordinary” to be up for song or record of the year. While Warren did score a best new artist nod, his 10-week Hot 100 No. 1 breakthrough smash left empty-handed in the big four and beyond. Aside from “Ordinary,” I also felt confident that Ravyn Lenae would be in the best new artist field. While her breakthrough single “Love Me Not” was ineligible because it was released in summer 2024, the timing of her big hit seemed like it would send her sailing into that category.

Eric Renner Brown: The Grammys whiffed by completely snubbing Lorde for an album that’s one of the year’s better pop records – and her best record in more than a decade (Lorde fans, sorry, Virgin is better than Melodrama!). But while I don’t think it should have been nominated, what I found most surprisingly was the general field omission of Elton John and Brandi Carlile’s collaborative Who Believes In Angels?, which had Grammy contender written all over it.

Kyle Denis: Outside of Ravyn Lenae and BigXThaPlug in best new artist and “Love Me Not” in record and song of the year, I was also surprised (but not disappointed) to see Alex Warren’s “Ordinary” left out of the genreal field. 

Paul Grein: Alex Warren’s “Ordinary” is the kind of stately power ballad that in years past would have been a surefire record and song of the year nominee. It topped the Hot 100 for 10 weeks. Warren even won best new artist at the VMAs, even though fellow nominee Sombr seemed a more MTV-ish choice. My runner-up surprise is that HUNTR/X’s “Golden” was nominated for song of the year but not record of the year. I would have figured it would be the other way around.

Andrew Unterberger: Just because of the context around The Weeknd’s Grammy history — with him essentially swearing off the Recording Academy after being totally shut out from the nominations in 2021, and then making his big conciliatory return to the stage at last year’s awards — it was pretty surprising to not see his Hurry Up Tomorrow or “Timeless” recognized in the big four, or anywhere else. Although considering the snub only received a fraction of the outcry that his After Hours-era bagel did four years earlier, perhaps that’s telling of the relative esteem that the public holds Tomorrow in.

3. Outside of the Big Four, which of the genre categories do you find the most interesting?

Katie Atkinson: I’ve got to go for best audio book, narration, and storytelling recording for the sheer variety of nominees. There’s five-time Grammy host Trevor Noah (Into the Uncut Grass), 1960s child star Kathy Garver (Elvis, Rocky & Me: The Carol Connors Story), Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson (Lovely One: A Memoir), the Dalai Lama (Meditations: The Reflections of His Holiness The Dalai Lama), and finally Fab Morvan’s return to the Grammys after his best new artist statue was revoked following Milli Vanilli’s lip-sync scandal (You Know It’s True: The Real Story of Milli Vanilli). It doesn’t get more all over the map than that.

Eric Renner Brown: The country, Americana, and folk categories. These genres were conspicuously overlooked in the general field, and reading through these genre category nominations shows how mistaken that was. From new-school talents like Tyler Childers, Billy Strings and Zach Top to chart-toppers like Jelly Roll and Eric Church to legends like Willie Nelson and Mavis Staples, this music had a strong year that deserved greater general field recognition. But seeing who prevails in these stacked genre categories will still be entertaining.

Kyle Denis: Interestingly, I think best dance pop recording is one of the most competitive categories at the 2026 ceremony. I’d be happy if any of those songs won, but I’m definitely rooting for Zara Larsson (“Midnight Sun”) and Pinkpantheress (“Illegal”). I also think best progressive R&B album is a highlight between the girl group (FLO) and Black queer (Durand Bernarr and Destin Conrad) representation. It was also dope to see that the best album cover category didn’t solely prioritize A-listers. 

Paul Grein: The nominees for best music film include everyone from new-wave greats Devo (Devo), reeling in their first Grammy nomination in 41 years, to genre-blending Brit singer-songwriter RAYE (Live at the Royal Albert Hall), who is a Grammy nominee for the second year in a row. Two of the nominated films – Music by John Williams and Pharrell Williams’ Piece by Piece –  were on the longlist for Oscar nominations for documentary feature film last year. The fifth nominee is Relentless, an aptly titled documentary of songwriter Diane Warren, who has amassed 16 Oscar nominations but still has the hunger of a twenty-something newbie looking for her first nod.

Andrew Unterberger: The rock nominations this year are wild. Amyl and the Sniffers for best rock performance? Tyler, the Creator for best alternative music album — with his dance album, no less? Turnstile in the rock, alternative and metal categories? Lotta surprises — and some questions to be had for sure — but it’s much more entertaining than the usual march of legacy acts we see in the rock categories, anyway.

4. The Recording Academy has taken great efforts to update and diversify its membership recently. Do you think these Grammy nominations show that the Recording Academy is still missing proper representation in any particular genre/demographic/area? If so, where?

Katie Atkinson: The album of the year field seems to reflect those efforts, with three rap albums, a Spanish-language album and an R&B album taking up more than half the field. The real test will be who comes out on top in that category, considering each of those five nominees would be a first-time winner in the category.

Eric Renner Brown: Even a few years ago, this album of the year slate would’ve been unimaginable: a majority of nominees are people of color, and three rap albums got nods. The general field feels more representative of mainstream music than ever, even if the limited number of available nominations means that something will always feel excluded.

That said, in the general field, the lack of country music is disappointing – as is the lack of dance/electronic, beyond Lady Gaga’s heavily dance-influenced album Mayhem and its lead single “Abracadabra.” For well over a decade dance music has helped to define the musical mainstream, and artists nominated in the dance/electronic categories this year – including Disclosure, Fred Again.., Skrillex and FKA twigs – are bona fide stars who deserve more visible recognition.

Kyle Denis: The Academy still has work to do with bolstering their Caribbean representation. In a year that spun out genuine crossover Caribbean hits like Moliy, Silent Addy & Disco Neil’s “Shake It to the Max” and Full Blown & Yung Bredda’s “The Greatest Bend Over,” a complete shut out for Caribbean music (outside of best reggae album) is indefensible. 

Paul Grein: Country is under-represented year after year. The Academy needs to make building up its country membership a priority. To their credit, it is transparent in releasing statistics on its voting membership. Unfortunately, that just confirms the problem: Just 7% of the total voting membership aligns with country, a percentage topped by 11 other genres, including such more specialized forms as jazz (16% of Grammy voters align with that genre) and classical (10% alignment). (Voters can check off more than one genre.)

On the day the nominations were announced, Melinda Newman wrote a must-read essay for Billboard.com, “Country Continues to Be the Grammys’ Poor Relation.” I hope the academy reads it and takes it to heart. They can and need to do better here.

Andrew Unterberger: It’s country. It just goes to show you that for as many incredible strides as the genre has made as a crossover genre on streaming — and even occasionally on radio — it still is often ignored altogether in a lot of pop spaces. Sure, maybe country’s shutout in best new artist was due in part to overcrowding between Ella Langley, Zach Top and Megan Moroney, with no one of those country candidates obviously outshining the other two. But that didn’t seem to affect Lola Young, Sombr or The Marias, three alt-rock-leaning acts who have had remarkably less trouble finding pop-world embrace, each of whom received BNA nominations. The contrast is stark.

5. Without getting into too many category specifics, which artist do you think is likely going to end up being the big winner on Grammy night in February?

Katie Atkinson: The obvious answer is Kendrick Lamar, who enters with nine nods and won five earlier this year. But another strong contender could be Leon Thomas. Even though I don’t see him walking away with album of the year come Feb. 1, I think there’s a clear path for him to win in his other five categories – which could set him up to be the next contender for one of those famous Grammy juggling photos, a la Norah Jones, Lauryn Hill or Adele.

Eric Renner Brown: Coming off a seismic, lauded 2025 – and with a Super Bowl halftime show booked for February – this feels like Bad Bunny’s year to make a run, especially in the album of the year category, where Debí Tirar Más Fotos is arguably the strongest nominee. At the same time, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Kendrick Lamar’s arms loaded up with trophies: His “Not Like Us” record and song of the year wins earlier this year proved he can triumph in general field categories, his cultural and commercial stock is as high as it’s ever been thanks to his own Super Bowl appearance and the 13-week Hot 100 No. 1 “Luther,” and the Pulitzer-winner has never won album of the year – nor has any hip-hop artist in over two decades.

Kyle Denis: This is a fight to the bitter end between Kendrick Lamar and Bad Bunny — and, right now, I think Benito has the edge. 

Paul Grein: I predict that Kendrick Lamar is headed for a seven-Grammy sweep, which would be just one shy of the record of eight Grammys in one night shared by Michael Jackson and Santana. That would hoist Lamar’s career Grammy total to 29 awards, more than any other rapper in history. (That title is currently held by Jay-Z with 25 wins.) Leon Thomas is probably headed for a five-Grammy night. He seems like the front-runner to win best new artist and to clean up in the R&B categories.

Andrew Unterberger: I could find arguments to make for Lady Gaga or Bad Bunny — and who knows, maybe they’ll convince me over the course of the next three months. But for right now, my gut still says Kendrick Lamar is the guy everyone likes, and who everyone wants to see win. And I think he’ll do a whole lot of that on February 1.

Trending on Billboard Method Man put down the microphone and picked up a camera on Sunday (Nov. 9) when the Wu-Tang Clan legend tried his hand as a photographer at the New York Jets versus Cleveland Browns game. Explore See latest videos, charts and news The rapper was the official NFL Celebrity Photographer for Sunday’s […]

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.
Fresh off the heels of just getting inducted in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, Atlanta-based hip-hop group Outkast is back in the limelight nearly 20 years after the pair’s last album Idlewild. The hip-hop duo is recognized for being one of the most influential groups of the ’90s and 2000s, with a style, sound and swagger that’s unmatched.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

To celebrate the duo’s induction, Outkast partnered with apparel company HOMAGE for a collection of tees, hoodies, crewnecks and more with prices starting at just $36.

The collection features iconic images from Outkast’s career, like art from ATLiens, Stankonia and others. In addition, there are a few items that celebrate Atlanta sports teams, like Atlanta Hawks, Atlanta Falcons and Atlanta Dream. HOMAGE even has a complete set with the Outkast logo, if you want to feel “so fresh, so clean” in loungewear.

Ahead, you’ll find our recommendations for the best items from the Outkast x HOMAGE collection.

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast Tee

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast ‘ATLiens’ Tee

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast ‘Two Dope Boys’ Tee

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast ‘I Am For Real’ Tee

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast ‘Pay Homage’ Tee

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast x Atlanta Hawks Crewneck

HOMAGE

Outkast X Homage

Outkast x Atlanta Falcons Crewneck

Meanwhile, the more you buy, the more you’ll save on shipping to your home. In fact, if you purchase $99 or more from HOMAGE, you’ll get free shipping on your entire order. Just buy three Outkast x HOMAGE t-shirts (or hoodies) and you’ll get free shipping.

HOMAGE also has a rewards program, so the more you buy, the more you’ll rack up points for exclusive savings and apparel. And best of all? HOMAGE Rewards is free to join with purchase.

With prices starting at $36 for tees and $72 for hoodies, HOMAGE’s Outkast collection is now available. Shop more items from the Outkast x HOMAGE collection, below:

Want more? HOMAGE has other unique remixes and collaborations, like the Tribe Called Quest x NBA collection. Learn more about HOMAGE and the company’s apparel here.

For more product recommendations, check out our roundups of the best Xbox deals, studio headphones and Nintendo Switch accessories.

Trending on Billboard

Entertainment management company Milk & Honey Music + Sports has acquired U.K.-based firm Bigfoot Music Management, Milk & Honey tells Billboard.

Under the terms of the deal, Bigfoot is being absorbed by Milk & Honey, meaning the firm will exist entirely under the Milk & Honey banner. As a result, Bigfoot’s current staff will now be part of the Milk & Honey team, and its entire client roster, which includes pioneering electronic producers Adam Beyer and Joris Voorn, will become Milk & Honey management clients. Beyer’s longtime manager, Jeremy Ford, will be senior vp of electronic for Milk & Honey globally and be based in the company’s London offices.

Related

The move further expands the dance/electronic footprint at Milk & Honey, as the company hired longtime music manager Andrew Goldstone as head of electronic music this past March. Goldstone brought manager Taren Smith into the company, along with clients including the dance/electronic artists Kream and Sullivan King.

“As diverse as the Milk & Honey brand is in mainstream music genres, we are equally invested in underground music,” Milk & Honey founder and CEO Lucas Keller tells Billboard. “The company looks after unique talent across all facets of the music business, and this deal with Bigfoot to join Milk & Honey represents a further investment into techno and electronic music which is a top priority for the company. We are very excited to have Jeremy and his team in our UK office and joining the global M&H outfit.”

Over the years, Ford and his team have helped guide and grow international dance brands, including Beyer’s Drumcode label and Voorne’s Netherlands-based house and techno label, Spectrum. Other artists on the Bigfoot roster who will now be represented by Milk & Honey include Juliet Fox, Sarah Story, Sam Wolfe, Simon Patterson and Will Atkinson.

“Over the past three decades, Jeremy Ford and Bigfoot Management have built one of the most respected operations in electronic music,” adds Milk & Honey head of artist management & sports Dave Frank. “From Adam Beyer and Joris Voorn to the iconic Drumcode brand that encompasses record label, events, fashion and globally syndicated radio, their team has played a big role in shaping modern techno and house. We’re thrilled to welcome the Bigfoot team into the Milk & Honey family as we combine our networks, relationships and resources in representing and growing world-class talent who are and will be the global stars that drive our scene into the future.”

“Since its inception, Bigfoot has always championed talented artists who possess authenticity and ambition as well as brands, labels and events that also share a purposeful, global vision,” says Ford. “We’ve always strived to embrace, nurture and develop visionary leaders within the scene. Joining Milk & Honey represents an incredible opportunity for us to expand our reach and strengthen our ability to serve artists in a wider capacity. We share the same values, drive, work ethic and belief in building long-term careers so with this partnership and the fusion of two such talented teams we look forward to an exciting future that will no doubt shine a brighter spotlight on those we represent.”

Trending on Billboard Ja Rule says Drake doesn’t need any advice on how to bounce back from the Kendrick Lamar feud. In a sit-down on Carmelo Anthony’s 7PM in Brooklyn podcast, Ja said if he were to give advice to Drizzy, he’d simply tell the 6 God to keep it pushing. “Drake don’t need no […]

Trending on Billboard

Myke Towers achieves a triple victory with his latest single, “Tengo Celos,” which dominates Billboard’s Latin Airplay, Latin Pop Airplay, and Latin Rhythm Airplay charts (each dated Nov. 15). This marks his second triple-chart win in 2025, following a similar accomplishment on the Aug. 9-dated rankings. It jumps 10-1 on Latin Airplay, 2-1 on Latin Pop Airplay and 4-1 on Latin Rhythm Airplay.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

“Seeing my name at No. 1 on all the radio charts in the United States and Puerto Rico is something that still amazes me, because behind every achievement like this there’s much more than numbers: there are sleepless nights, sacrifices, tough decisions, and above all, a real connection with the people,” Towers tells Billboard.

“Tengo Celos” was released July 17, as part of Towers’ album Island Boyz, via OneWorld International/Warner/Warner Latina. While the set reached No. 8 high on the Latin Rhythm Albums chart then, the song skyrockets 10-1 on the overall Latin Airplay chart after a 43% gain in audience impressions, to 8.1 million, earned in the United States on the week ending Nov. 6, according to Luminate.

The latest victory secures Towers his 16th No. 1 on the Latin Airplay chart. It follows “Soleao,” with Quevedo, which became the first track from Island Boyz to reach the top spot in August. As a solo artist without collaborations, “Tengo Celos” becomes Towers’ fourth chart-topper on the overall Latin radio tally, joining “Lala” (2023) as well as “La Falda” and “La Capi,” both in 2024.

“This No. 1 is for my team, for those who believe, for the radio stations that support me, and for the audience that always stands by me,” Towers adds. “Representing my island and seeing how Latin music continues to grow around the world is a blessing that I never take for granted. We keep working with the same hunger and the same faith as on the first day.”

As “Tengo Celos” secures a triple coronation across the Latin Airplay, Latin Rhythm Airplay, and Latin Pop Airplay charts, it becomes the fourth song to accomplish this feat in 2025. Towers previously hit the same milestone in August with his Quevedo collab, “Soleao.” Earlier this year, Danny Ocean and Kapo’s “Imagínate” topped all three charts (April). Most recently, Maluma joined the list of triple-achievers with “Bronceador” in October.

Trending on Billboard

Under a new partnership between Universal Music Group (UMG) and Udio, Taylor Swift will soon be able to flip the AI-music switch and allow users to create all the songs they want in the superstar’s style — as would every other artist signed to the world’s biggest label. 

“It’s their choice,” Udio’s CEO, Andrew Sanchez, told Billboard shortly after the deal was announced. “But yeah, in the new service, you would be able to do that, and you’d be able to make extraordinary music.”

Related

Unsurprisingly, Swift was unavailable for comment. But would artists be open to tossing their songs into a generative AI machine to see what the robots can do with them? Maybe, some top managers say. Sia, for example, “views Sia as an avatar,” says Jonathan Daniel, who manages the “Chandelier” hitmaker as well as Miley Cyrus and UMG artist Lorde. “It’s like anyone can be a pop star. That’s why she wears the wig.”

On Oct. 29, UMG was the first major label to settle a lawsuit with Udio, one of the top AI-music services, agreeing to develop a new creation and streaming platform that’s set to launch next year. Under the deal, artists will be able to opt in to the platform in “granular” ways, according to Sanchez, allowing them to choose — by essentially selecting from a menu of options — exactly how fans are allowed to use their music and voices to create songs. 

Although Daniel says many of his other clients, including Green Day and Nirvana, are unlikely to submit their catalogs to AI, he adds, “Not all artists, but certainly a lot of artists, are less worried about AI music than people that sound worried about it. Artists are in the magic business, right?”

Related

AI has spent 2025 creeping into the music business, as artists like Xania Monet and Unbound Music have hit the Billboard charts via streaming and track sales. As Matt Pollack — a senior manager at Monotone Inc., which represents Jack White, Vampire Weekend, LCD Soundsystem and others — puts it, artists, managers and labels must suddenly contend with a future that “wasn’t happening eight weeks ago, and now it is.”

The idea of opting into an AI-music service, even if it’s legal under the terms of the UMG-Udio deal, remains daunting for many artists. (The other two major labels, Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Music Group, have pending litigation against Udio and, along with UMG, another AI-music firm, Suno; their complaint alleges infringement on “an almost unimaginable scale.”) “Once you start to put words in an artist’s mouth, you’re in a real danger zone,” says Jeff Jampol, CEO of Jam Inc., which manages the estates of The Doors, Janis Joplin, Charlie Parker and others. “The legacy is the art and their voice. Do I want to take that and co-opt it and twist it? No, I don’t.”

Corey Smyth, owner and CEO of Blacksmith Holdings, a management company for Vince Staples, De La Soul, the Max Roach estate and others, worries about the idea of major labels managing the AI future of the business. In his view, label executives profited greatly from the streaming revolution, while many artists received pennies for their work. “They’re going to screw you on it,” he says. “The industry’s not built like that. They’re not building it for you.”

Related

As for whether his Universal-signed artists might agree to the AI treatment, Smyth says, “It depends on where you are, what your business model is. Are you a legacy artist, [or] are you just a flash in the pan? Most artists are driven by the idea of creating. Anyone who wants to just have the thing done isn’t trying to create art — they’re creating commerce.” Daniel, manager of Sia and Green Day, adds that AI is a “great tool” that “might replace pretty good music,” but “great artists have a point of view. Is AI going to write American Idiot? I don’t think so.”

At Monotone, the management company, AI music is a central topic at weekly staff meetings, Pollack says, including the implications of their clients “opting in” to AI systems, as Sanchez suggested after the Oct. 29 settlement with UMG. One of Montone’s artists is working on short-form video content on a low budget and uses AI to save time and money. But he also finds the concept of managing an AI artist that is “not a breathing entity” a bit too surreal, whether major labels allow the possibility or not. Says Pollack: “That’s insane.”

“The reality of it is, I don’t really know,” he adds. “Nobody ever really planned for this. This was a science-fiction notion up to a year and a half or two years ago.”

Trending on Billboard

In March 1984, “Thriller” reached No. 4 on the Billboard Hot 100 — becoming the seventh top 10 hit on Michael Jackson‘s blockbuster album of the same name, a then-record on the chart. On this week’s Hot 100 (dated Nov. 15), the song reaches the top 10 again for the first time since that run, bounding 32-10.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

The reason for the 40-plus-year-old song flying up the chart is simple: It returns annually around this time of year, having re-charted on the Hot 100 in 11 of the last 13 Halloween seasons (dating back to 2013), and in every such season since 2018. With its spooky production, suspenseful lyrics and iconic mini-horror movie music video, “Thriller” has become an obvious Halloween soundtrack staple, with its radio airplay and streams spiking every late October (often bleeding into early November) as a result.

But before this year, the song had never re-charted higher than No. 19 — where it landed on the Hot 100 in 2021, followed by three straight years re-charting somewhere in the 20s. So if it made the top 10 this year, that must mean the song received an even bigger bump in streaming and sales than usual, right?

Not exactly. In its biggest 2024 week of Halloween-boosted performance (the tracking week ending Oct. 31), “Thriller” racked up 17 million official U.S. streams, according to Luminate — its highest weekly tally of the 2020s — along with 5,000 in digital song sales. This year, “Thriller” amassed 14 million streams in its biggest week (for the week ending Nov. 6, as reflected on the latest Hot 100), with 3,000 in sales.

The simplest explanation for the downtick isn’t that “Thriller” suddenly got less popular: It’s more likely just a matter of timing. In 2024, the tracking week (which always runs from Friday to Thursday) ended with Halloween that Thursday — which means that “Thriller” got to count consumption from both Halloween night and the six days of build-up to it, when Halloween songs are usually already heating up.

This year, with Halloween on a Friday, that build-up was all counted towards the prior tracking week (Oct. 24-30), with the song’s daily streams and sales dropping off immediately following Halloween night, and all but returning to usual levels following Halloween weekend. You can see the disparity for “Thriller” in the respective weeks immediately prior to its biggest week of the year: In 2024, it earned 17 million streams the week of Halloween, but only 5.8 million the week before; for 2025, it earned 14 million streams during Halloween week but 8.9 million the week before. (Combine the two weeks into one overall Halloween season and “Thriller” is close to even on streaming year-over-year.)

So how do we explain the chart jump in 2025? It seemingly has less to do with “Thriller” than with the competition it’s facing. With Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl songs receding from their spectacular streaming debuts a month earlier, and few new hits speeding in to replace them, the top streaming (and selling) songs are performing at a lower rate than they were the past two years at this point in the calendar.

This week, “Thriller” ranks sixth on our Streaming Songs chart and fifth on Digital Song Sales, with 14 million streams and 3,000 in sales. In both 2023 and 2024, those numbers would not have been strong enough to make the top 10 of either chart.

Also helping with the “Thriller” bump: With Billboard updating its rules in October for songs on the chart going recurrent, several long-lasting songs that might have otherwise been in its way in the Hot 100’s top tiers — including Teddy Swims’ “Lose Control” and Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars’ “Die With a Smile” — have since been deemed ineligible for the latest list.

So with fewer songs performing at a particularly high level in streams or sales, and a handful of those songs no longer eligible to chart anyway, there’s simply more room for revived hits like “Thriller” to zoom toward top of the chart. And it’s not the only song taking advantage of the extra opportunity: A little lower on the Hot 100, fellow Halloween perennials from Bobby “Boris” Pickett and the Crypt-Kickers (“Monster Mash,” No. 21), Ray Parker Jr. (“Ghostbusters,” No. 22) and Rockwell (“Somebody’s Watching Me,” No. 24) all also make the chart’s top 25 for the first time in the streaming era.

It’s also worth pointing out that while the competition from brand-new releases was minimal for Halloween songs on this week’s Hot 100 — the highest debut on the chart comes at No. 93 (Yeat’s “Come n Go”), though a couple Christmas songs also make an early re-appearance in the 30s and 40s — it was more formidable the past couple spooky seasons. Indeed, “Thriller” and its ilk might have threatened similar streaming-era chart peaks to their performances this year if not for the release of Tyler, the Creator’s Chromakopia before the Hot 100 dated Nov. 9 in 2024, or (again) Taylor Swift, with 1989 (Taylor’s Version) right before the Hot 100 dated Nov. 11 in 2023 — both of which charted numerous songs across the top 20.

Will this trend continue, with “Thriller” and its Halloween cohorts continuing to scale higher and higher on the Hot 100 until one day potentially competing for the No. 1 — like Mariah Carey’s “All I Want for Christmas Is You” and its Christmas compatriots do annually around the holiday season? Possibly, but the answer to that may lie more with the performance of the rest of the non-holiday music industry than with “Thriller” and friends themselves.