djfrosty

ASCAP, BMI & SOCAN to Accept Registrations of Partially AI-Generated Music

Trending on Billboard

ASCAP, BMI and SOCAN have all adopted policies to accept registrations of musical compositions partially generated using artificial intelligence (AI) tools, the PROs jointly announced Tuesday (Oct. 28), while noting that they will continue to reject registrations of fully AI-generated works.

According to a press release, all three PROs define a partially AI-generated musical work as one fusing elements of AI-generated musical content with elements of human authorship. All of these works will be included in the repertoires licensed by each of the societies.

Related

Also in the release, the three PROS reiterated their stance that training AI technologies on copyright musical works without permission, credit or compensation is theft — adding that all three societies have continually advocated for strong copyright laws and defended music creators amid debates over AI policies in the U.S. and Canada. They additionally note that they have endorsed legislation and supported lawsuits to protect creators against the illegal use of their works to train AI, among other things.

“Songwriters and composers have always experimented with innovative tools as part of their creative process, and AI is no exception,” said Elizabeth Matthews, CEO of ASCAP, in a statement. “We are clarifying our registration policy to now welcome partially AI-generated musical works because we believe AI can be a powerful tool for our members, as long as the law puts humans first and technology companies play fair and respect the rights of creators.”

“This is an important first step in protecting human creativity as AI technologies evolve, while supporting the songwriters and composers who choose to use AI as a tool to enhance their creative process,” added Mike O’Neill, president & CEO of BMI. “All music creators will benefit from this aligned approach to the registration of partial AI-works that appropriately values creators’ contributions and ensures they are paid properly.”

Added Jennifer Brown, CEO of SOCAN: “This alignment creates a legal and ethical path forward for AI in music. It recognizes that music creators are embracing new tools, while reinforcing our commitment to what matters most: respect for their work and the protection of human creativity. The future of music can embrace AI and still remain deeply human.”

Billboard VIP Pass

Daily newsletters straight to your inbox


Sign Up

Spotify Raises Prices in U.K. on Individual, Family and Duo Plans

Trending on Billboard

Spotify subscribers in the U.K., the world’s third-largest recorded music market, will be paying more for Spotify premium plans starting with the next billing cycle. As confirmed by a company spokesperson, Spotify customers in the U.K. were notified of upcoming price increases, marking the second time in approximately 18 months that Spotify has raised prices in the market.

Related

For U.K. subscribers, the Spotify premium individual plan will cost 12.99 GBP ($17.24), up from the 11.99 GBP ($15.91) price established in 2024. Family plans will rise to 21.99 GBP ($29.18) from 19.99 GBP ($26.53). Duo, a two-person plan, will increase to 17.99 GBP ($23.87) from 16.99 GBP ($22.55). All three plans include 15 hours per month of audiobook listening time (only the plan managers receive audiobook time on family and duo accounts). The student plan, which does not include audiobook listening, remains unchanged at 5.99 GBP ($7.95) per month. 

Price increases, along with gains in the number of subscribers, drove Spotify’s 16% increase in subscription revenue in the second quarter, CFO Christian Luiga said during the company’s July 29 earnings call. The number of subscribers rose just 12%, suggesting that revenue growth from price increases was the larger of the two factors.

The U.K. is not alone in experiencing higher prices. Earlier this year, Spotify hiked prices in France, the world’s sixth-largest recorded music market, and announced a price increase in Germany, the fourth-largest market. The U.S., the world’s largest market, could be next. As Billboard reported on Oct. 22, numerous equity analysts believe Spotify will raise prices in the U.S. by early 2026. 

Billboard VIP Pass

Daily newsletters straight to your inbox


Sign Up

Sia Divorce Escalates Into Custody Battle, With Claims of Drug Addiction and Child Pornography

Trending on Billboard

Sia and her estranged husband are fighting over custody of their child amid divorce proceedings — and the allegations are getting ugly.

David Bernad, an oncologist who married Sia at the end of 2022, claims in a Monday (Oct. 27) court filing that the pop star is a drug addict who cannot adequately care for their 19-month-old son, Somersault. In a Tuesday (Oct. 28) response, Sia reveals that Bernad was recently under investigation for alleged possession of child pornography.

The claims come in California divorce proceedings, which Sia initiated this past March due to “irreconcilable differences.” Bernad has since been seeking hefty spousal support from Sia, and his request for more than $250,000 a month is set for a hearing in January.

Now, Bernad is asking for full custody of Somersault (referred to by the nickname “Summi” in court documents). He alleges in the Monday filing that Sia, who has been open about her past struggles with drug addiction, is once again using.

“Sia is an unfit and unreliable parent struggling with substance abuse and addiction, rendering her incapable of providing safe or stable care for Summi,” writes Bernad in a declaration. “I am the only safe and reliable parent for our son. I am a doctor, young, healthy, and have no criminal history or drug or alcohol addiction issues.”

Bernad says he witnessed Sia abuse ketamine and opioids during their marriage, and he claims doctors found barbiturates and benzodiazepines in her system during a hospital stay last month. He says Sia should have supervised visits with Summi, and only after she’s undergone a breathalyzer test. Bernad also wants the singer to submit to random drug testing and pay him $77,000 per month in child support.

Sia, however, counters in her Tuesday court filing that she has been “fully sober for over six months” and remains committed to recovery. She says Bernad is actually the one who parties and uses recreational drugs, and that this is one of the main reasons she chose to divorce him.

“Dan’s attempt to weaponize my past sobriety journey — an issue long resolved and well-documented — serves no legitimate purpose and is intended only to distort the facts and undermine my credibility before this court,” writes Sia in a declaration. “His willingness to dredge up decades-old history to serve his own financial and strategic interests demonstrates the extent to which he will go, even at the expense of his child and the child’s mother.”

Sia says Summi should remain in her primary custody, as has been the case since this summer. According to the court filings, Bernad agreed to this arrangement — including a stipulation that his own visits be supervised — because he was under investigation for alleged child pornography found on his computer hard drive in July.

Bernad “vehemently” denies any wrongdoing and claims Sia “planted” this illicit material on his hard drive. The Los Angeles Police Department and the city’s Department of Child and Family Services both looked into the claims but closed their investigations without any charges, citing a lack of evidence.

Nonetheless, Sia says she’s still not comfortable with Bernad spending unsupervised time with Summi. She says Bernad is not prepared to care for Summi by himself because he was an absentee parent during their marriage, often jetting overseas “at a moment’s notice.”

Sia’s lawyer declined to comment on the proceedings on Tuesday. A rep for Bernad did not immediately return a request for comment.  

Billboard VIP Pass

Ariana Grande Kicks Off ‘Wicked: For Good’ Press Tour by Celebrating Her A-List Mentors: Mariah, Madonna & Beyoncé

Trending on Billboard

If there were a pop version of the Avengers, we think Ariana Grande‘s trio of early mentors would all be included.

On the new Billboard Pop Shop Podcast, Katie & Keith are chatting about Ari kicking off the Wicked: For Good press tour by sitting down with Evan Ross Katz on his Shut Up Evan podcast. In the 45-minute-plus conversation, Katz asks what Grande’s relationship is with mentorship — and that’s when she shouts out the impressive triumvirate of pop superstars.

There’s Madonna, who was “immediately very kind,” Grande said. Then there’s Beyoncé, who invited Ari to join her on a music video set early in her career (“she just was being kind”). Then there’s Mariah Carey — because “of course, Mariah.”

Listen to our full conversation about Grande’s first interview of the press tour for the Nov. 21 movie musical below.

Also on the show, we’ve got chart news on how Olivia Dean and Leon Thomas both get their first top 10 hits on the Billboard Hot 100, while Tame Impala’s latest album debuts in the top five on the Billboard 200 and at No. 1 on six more charts.

The Billboard Pop Shop Podcast is your one-stop shop for all things pop on Billboard‘s weekly charts. You can always count on a lively discussion about the latest pop news, fun chart stats and stories, new music, and guest interviews with music stars and folks from the world of pop. Casual pop fans and chart junkies can hear Billboard‘s executive digital director, West Coast, Katie Atkinson and Billboard’s managing director, charts and data operations, Keith Caulfield every week on the podcast, which can be streamed on Billboard.com or downloaded in Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast provider. (Click here to listen to the previous edition of the show on Billboard.com.)

Get weekly rundowns straight to your inbox


Sign Up

Drake Sued for Endorsing ‘Unlawful’ Gambling Platform: ‘Deeply Fraudulent’

Trending on Billboard

Drake and online streamer Adin Ross are facing a class action lawsuit accusing them of promoting illegal gambling by endorsing the online sweepstake casino Stake.

In a case filed Monday (Oct. 27), lawyers for a Missouri man say Drake, Ross and Stake engaged in “deceptive, fraudulent and unfair” practices in the state — and that Champagne Papi used his massive celebrity to “encourage impressionable users to gamble.”

Related

“Drake’s role as Stake’s unofficial mascot is quietly corrosive — he’s glamorizing the platform to millions of impressionable fans, many of whom treat his wild betting habits like gospel,” write lawyers for plaintiff Justin Killham.

Stake is a so-called sweepstakes casino that operates on a “dual currency” system, which critics say is designed to evade gambling regulations. Such platforms sell “gold coins” that they claim are purely for entertainment, then offer separate free “sweeps coins” that can be redeemed for cash, meaning neither constitutes full-fledged gambling. California, New Jersey and other states have moved to rein in the practice, either with new legislation or beefed-up enforcement of existing state gambling laws.

The case filed Monday claims that Stake, a Curaçao-based livestream gambling platform, violated Missouri’s gambling laws with that kind of system. The site tried to mislead consumers, the lawsuit claims, “into believing it offers harmless gameplay instead of an unlawful gambling platform.”

Related

The complaint also claims that the company paid Drake and Ross millions to promote that illegal operation. But lawyers for the plaintiffs say the stars have done so under “deeply fraudulent pretenses,” including fronting the stars’ “house money” to risk.

“When Ross and Drake purport to gamble online with Stake.com, they often do not do so with their own money despite telling the public in Missouri and elsewhere the opposite,” Killham’s lawyers write. “Stake’s and Drake’s and Ross’s conduct here threatens the welfare of Missouri residents and especially its young people.”

Representatives for Drake and Stake did not return Billboard‘s requests for comment by press time. A representative for Ross could not immediately be located.

Billboard VIP Pass

Daily newsletters straight to your inbox


Sign Up

Julia Wolf Reveals Drake DM That Led to ‘Dog House’ Collab: ‘He’s a Super Open-Minded Guy’

Trending on Billboard

Julia Wolf went from a relatively unknown artist to notching a Drake collaboration seemingly overnight. The emerging singer joined the Zach Kang Show on Monday (Oct. 27), where she detailed how a Drake Instagram follow and DM led to them eventually collaborating on “Dog House” in September.

“We were freaking out, it was like 6 in the morning… It’s 6 a.m. and Tanner’s waking me up [at] 6 in the morning — ‘Champagnepapi followed you!’” she recalled. “Then it’s freaking Drake, and he DMs me lyrics of ‘In My Room.’ How do you have a regular day?”

Wolf explained that it was actually someone else who put him on and requested a Julia Wolf song when he was DJing for friends at a club.

“Drake was DJing with a group of five or six people at the back of a club,” she said. “He was playing all sorts of music and then this one girl, who was a friend of a friend, went up to him and was like, ‘Can you play ‘In My Room’ by Julia Wolf?’ He said he played it and stopped everything and reached out to me then and there. It was so cool. He’s a super open-minded guy.”

Wolf immediately got to writing after Drake asked her about any unreleased demos she had lying around that he could possibly use.

“That first day he was like, ‘Send me some demos.’ I had no demos to give him, so I went to my room. Literally just writing anything I can over [sic] loops,” she said. “I’m like, ‘What can I possibly say that Drake can resonate with?’ He’s resonating with ‘In My Room,’ he’s loving the album, he’s saying, ‘This is so me.’”

Wolf continued: “Out of the four or five things was ‘Dog House.’ It’s actually part of a larger song. The part in ‘Dog House’ was the chorus I had at the end. I sent it and it was immediate. He was like, ‘This is the one, this is my life. This is our song.’”

Plenty of time went by and Wolf was left in the dark as she had no idea what she sent would be turned into. Eventually, that changed on Sept. 9 when Drake’s “Dog House” arrived featuring YEAT with a photo of Wolf as the cover art.

The BYNX-produced track debuted at No. 54 on the Billboard Hot 100 and cracked the top 10 of the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart.

Watch the full interview below. Talk about Drake starts just shy of the 39-minute mark.

Lily Allen Doesn’t ‘Need Revenge’ After Dropping Album About David Harbour Divorce & Alleged Infidelity

Trending on Billboard

Following the release of her searing new album West End Girl, Lily Allen says she’s leaving her past exactly where it belongs: the past.

In a conversation with Interview Magazine published Tuesday (Oct. 28), the British singer — who split from actor David Harbour after four years of marriage in February — said she has no inclinations toward “revenge” following her breakup, which inspired much of the material on the LP. On tracks like “West End Girl” and “Nonmonogamummy,” Allen details a situation in which she felt pressured to enter an open relationship, the terms of which were subsequently violated by her partner; on songs such as “Madeline” and “P—y Palace,” she sings about alleged infidelity.

“That’s what’s fun about this record,” she explained to the publication. “It’s viscerally like going through the motions. At the time, I was really trying to process things, and that’s great in terms of the album, but I don’t feel confused or angry now. I don’t need revenge.”

“I wrote this record in 10 days in December, and I feel very differently about the whole situation now,” she added. “We all go through breakups and it’s always f—ing brutal.”

Released Oct. 24, West End Girl marks the first full-length Allen has dropped since separating from the Stranger Things actor. The pair had tied the knot in an intimate ceremony in Las Vegas in 2020 after meeting on the dating app Raya the year prior.

The new album — which has been receiving acclaim from both fans and critics online — seemingly finds Allen breaking down the reasons why she and Harbour split, though she reminded fans during her Interview convo, “Some of it is based on truth and some of it is fantasy.”

She also opened up about the struggles of meeting new people after the end of a long-term romance. “They’re awful, especially if you’re going through heartbreak,” she said of dating apps. “There is nothing more depressing than hundreds of people that are nothing like the person that you’re missing. It’s just like, ‘No, that’s not him. That’s not him. That’s not him.’”


Billboard VIP Pass

Get weekly rundowns straight to your inbox


Sign Up

The Best Musician-Backed Beauty Brands, Ranked

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.

Beauty and music go hand-in-hand. Whether you’re strutting onstage in full face, à la Lady Gaga on the Mayhem Ball tour, or getting glammed up to see your favorite musicians in concert, music and makeup give fans an opportunity to express themselves in fun, creative and eye-catching new ways.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

There are a plethora of musicians who have gone on to start their own cosmetic brands, from Rihanna and Jennifer Lopez to Ariana Grande and Selena Gomez. (Beyoncé and Shakira both have successful hair care lines but for the purposes of this article, we are only including beauty brands) As a longtime lover of beauty, these brands have always caught my eye because they’re an extension of each musician’s identity and persona, expanding their art and creativity beyond the stage.

Brands backed by the likes of Gaga (Haus Labs) or Halsey’s About Face feature bold offerings with formulas that are just as unique as they are, while Gomez’s Rare Beauty focuses on softer, more wearable tones with user-friendly formulas, mirroring the singer’s everyday makeup. Rihanna’s Fenty Beauty, meanwhile, is glamorous and just as artful as she is, utilizing colors and glittering finishes that remind me of the “Diamonds” singer’s equally bold and experimental fashion choices.

This concept of musicians and makeup isn’t new, of course. Stars like Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, Gwen Stefani and even Victoria Beckham have been lending their acclaim to the cosmetics industry since the dawn of time, urging fans to shop everything under the sun from body mists to edible makeup (if you know, you know).

Still, not all celebrity makeup and beauty brands are created equal. Some stars are more involved in the production of their lines, while others may just see them as a — literal — vanity project. Below, I’ve ranked a few of the top musician-owned beauty brands, based on formulas, pricing, uniqueness and accessibility. I’ll be breaking down the pros and cons of each line and diving deep into why they’re ranked where they are.

As for why I got this assignment: I am an avid beauty lover and have been since I was 13, and I have covered the beauty and fashion beats at many different publications over the years, including Allure, WWD, Glamour and now Billboard. If that doesn’t convince you, I have very strong opinions — especially on the beauty industry and its practices.

Read on for the best musician beauty brands that you can buy online right now.

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images

No. 7

JLO Beauty by Jennifer Lopez

Pros: Beautiful packaging, strong branding identity, focus on body care

Cons: Outdated product, pricing

Lopez launched JLO Beauty in 2020, and it was made available to the public the next year in 2021. The brand features everything from skincare to body care, with a few makeup products here and there. JLO Beauty’s focus on body care and skincare is what differentiates it from the other brands on this list, making it a standout if you’re looking for coverage beyond just your face.

The packaging is also a big draw for me, with all the gold accents and eye-catching JLO branding. Some of my favorite products from the brand include their That Star Filter Complexion Booster for $39 and That Limitless Glow Sheet Mask 3 Pack for $49. Both those products and the brand’s existing line can be shopped at Revolve.

If I could pinpoint where the brand needs to revamp, I can think of two things: First, the product is outdated, with formulas that have been done before. While Lopez’s skin is amazing, it is likely thanks to the treatments she has had as a world-renowned celeb, not because of her product line. Personally, when I think of JLO, I am not thinking about her skin. I’m thinking about her hit music. She needs to make herself an authority on the subject of skincare if she wants to get people excited about her products. I’m craving more inventive product, even a rebrand if possible — something to further differentiate her brand from the rest.

GVXE

No. 6

GXVE by Gwen Stefani

Pros: Strong branding, affordable pricing

Cons: Non-inventive products, needs a formula revamp

Stefani began GXVE in 2022 and it was launched in Sephora only a few weeks later. The product line backed by the “Luxurious” singer is exceedingly affordable, boasting strong and eye-catching branding that matches the singer’s own unique sense of style. The product line is also extremely stripped-down, filled with simple and easy-to-use products for the everyday girl looking to get glam.

Some of my favorites from the brand include their Paint It Up Clean 24-Hr Cream Eyeshadow for $10 and the Pick It Up Cream Contour & Talc-Free Powder Bronzer Duo for $14. Every product mentioned, and much more, can be shopped at Sephora.

Where GXVE lacks is inventiveness. The product line is barebones and contains makeup that has been done before, and done better. With a formula revamp, and a quick trip back to the drawing board, I believe the brand could be even greater. I’d like to see new product ideas that fit the 2025 consumer with innovation in mind. With a name like Stefani attached to the line, the brand has the power to do more and go farther.

Courtesy of r.e.m. beauty

No. 5

R.E.M. Beauty by Ariana Grande

Pros: Affordability, cohesive product line, unique range, best basics

Cons: Brand identity, consumers are craving something new

Grande’s R.E.M. Beauty launched back in 2021 with an “Ultraviolet” collection. The line has since grown to include skincare and makeup brushes. The line is affordable and tells a cohesive story with products that reflect Grande’s personal tastes. The basics, like blushes, highlighters and lip products, are solid through and through, boasting a healthy range of both experimental and wearable hues. Some of my favorites include the Essential Drip Glossy Balm for $19, Hypernova Satin Matte Blush for $22 and their Hypernova Satin Matte Bronzer for $28. All of these products can be shopped at Ulta Beauty.

The brand’s complexion line is where improvements can be made. The Sweetener Foundation is serviceable, as is their concealer of the same name, but both are not in any way remarkable. It’s something we’ve seen before, a lightweight but full-coverage finish. You’ve likely not heard much buzz about those products for that reason. In general, R.E.M. Beauty’s product line is for those looking for approachable products with makeup that you can trust.

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Fenty Beauty by Rihanna

No. 4

Fenty Beauty by Rihanna

Pros: Inclusivity, affordability

Cons: Too many eggs in one basket, flash-in-the-pan virality

One thing I will always give Rihanna flowers for is Fenty Beauty’s commitment to inclusivity, something that not every brand aims to prioritize. When the brand launched in 2017, Rihanna was almost immediately praised for her line of Pro Filt’r Soft Matte Longwear foundations. At the time, it came in 40 shades, a massive feat for 2017. Since then, the foundation line has included 10 more, bumping the total shade range up to 50.

The brand is also exceedingly affordable, even with a celebrity name attached. No makeup-centric product in the line, including brushes, is over $60. If all that wasn’t enough, the brand is extremely accessible, available in store and online at both Ulta Beauty and Sephora. Some of my favorite products from the Rihanna-backed line include their Bright Fix Instant Brightening + Blurring Powder for $38, Gloss Bomb Stix High-Shine Gloss Stick for $26, Diamond Bomb All-Over Diamond Veil for $43 and Match Stix Contour Skinstick for $32.

A common issue with celeb-run brands, and where Fenty Beauty suffers, is that they really have too many eggs in one basket. With a skincare line, their very own brushes, fragrance line, haircare line and makeup all under one roof, it can be easy to produce product that is uninteresting or of less quality. My belief is that if the brand focused all of its time on makeup, every product would be a slam dunk.

Alana O’Herlihy for about-face

No. 3

About Face by Halsey

Pros: Creative product, unique formula, artistic perspective, beautiful packaging, affordability

Cons: Not for everyone, lack of complexion products

Halsey’s About Face is all about artistic perspective. I fell in love with the brand’s creative product line, which boasts unique formulas with affordable price tags to boot. The makeup line is for those looking for something exciting and inventive out of their beauty products. Some of my favorite products launched from About Face include their Holographic Eye Paint for $19, Cheek Freak Blush Balm for $18, Line Artist Liners for $15 and their Curtain Call – Set & Smooth Loose Powder for $21. You can snag all these products, and more, in store and online at Ulta Beauty.

My only gripes with the brand are that the product can be unapproachable, what with the extreme and unique shades of lip gloss, blush, eyeshadow and even setting powder. About Face’s complexion products are also lacking. The brand has a pretty standard foundation but no concealer, which I find a little odd.

Courtesy of Rare Beauty

No. 2

Rare Beauty by Selena Gomez

Pros: Inclusive packaging, niche market, everyday makeup, clean beauty, easy to use

Cons: Lacking creativity, simple product range, not for experimental beauty

Selena Gomez’s Rare Beauty was launched in 2019 and filled an inclusivity hole in the beauty market. The product launch was, and is, focused on inclusivity, giving those with disabilities access to makeup that they can actually use (all of the product packaging is easy to open and close, and easy to apply for those with dexterity issues). The makeup itself fits into the “clean beauty” category, with shades and formulas that are standard and less inventive than something like Halsey’s About Face.

If you’re looking for product that works, and works well, with shades and formulas that work for everyone, then Rare Beauty should be your go-to. Some of my favorites from the brand include their Kind Words Lip Liner for $16, Brow Harmony Precision Eyebrow Pencil for $19 and, a sleeper hit, their Rare Fragrance Layering Balms, also for $19. These products are available online and in store at Sephora.

A note: This makeup line is not for those seeking out extremely creative formulas. The product is simplistic, oftentimes lacking creativity. All that to say, don’t expect to be creating colorful looks with Rare Beauty products. You’ll likely have to look somewhere else for that.

Haus Labs by Lady Gaga

No. 1

Haus Labs by Lady Gaga

Pros: Inclusive line, innovative products, quality formula, focus on artistry

Cons: Product line might not suit everyone’s makeup style, eyeshadow department needs an upgrade, lack of affordability.

When Haus Labs launched in 2019, I was immediately drawn to the brand. It just made sense from an artistic perspective, knowing Lady Gaga’s proclivity for fashion and beauty. The musician is well-known for her striking makeup. It’s been a key part of her identity both on and off stage. The line’s star performer, their Triclone Skin Tech foundation, went viral for its airbrushed finish and buildable coverage, making skin look like skin.

Not only that, but the shade range was impressive, boasting 51 total shades as of 2025. This is another brand focused on artistry, with quality formulas and inventive color stories across the board, reflecting Gaga’s love of maximalist looks. Some of my favorites from the brand include the Triclone Skin Tech foundation for $49, Color Fuse Blushes for $32, PhD Hybrid Hydrating Tinted Lip Oil for $26 and their Cruelty-Free Foundation Brush for $39. All of these products are available online and in stores at Sephora.

My big hang-up for Haus Labs is their affordability. The price tag might be due to Gaga’s name tied to the project, or perhaps the quality of packaging and product. Whatever the case may be, the price tag certainly makes the brand less accessible. The product line is more inventive, which could also deter those looking for more natural, everyday makeup.

Juvenile Boasts He Got 50 Cent His Record Deal With Eminem: ‘Ask 50, He’ll Tell You’

Trending on Billboard

Juvenile says he’s responsible for 50 Cent‘s legendary Shady Records deal — and he says 50 can attest to it.

In an interview with Nyla Symone, Juvenile explained how after 50’s near-fatal shooting, he became a pariah of the music industry and that no one wanted to work with him.

“I got 50 Cent his record deal with Eminem,” Juvenile explained. “Ask 50, he’ll tell you, yeah, Juve was the one. 50 couldn’t really go to the studio at the time, and I was one of the first cats with a studio bus, so I let him record on my bus, him, [Tony] Yayo, and [Lloyd] Banks.”

Juve said that Eminem invited him to a music video set while filming for D12 in New York City, and that he brought along former G-Unit president Sha Money XL.

“When I went over there with Sha Money, my first thing was telling him the type of music Em doing and the type of music 50 doing with the diss thing…that’s going to work if he go with him. And it worked,” Juvenile explained, adding that 50 even wrote about Juve’s role in his book, though didn’t specify which one.

Billboard has reached out to 50 Cent’s team for comment.

50 Cent actually recently joked that he’s finally leaving G-Unit, claiming its because Tony Yayo took too long to diss Jim Jones and Memphis Bleek. In a video posted to 50 Cent’s Instagram, the mogul is seen making some jokes while aboard a private jet with Tony Yayo about leaving G-Unit.

I’ve been doing some soul searching, and I think I want out the group, OK?” Fif told Yayo.

“If anything, you just kicking us out the group,” Yayo responded.

“Took too long to respond to Jimmy and Memphis Bleek,” 50 Cent continued. “I’m saying, n—as is talking mad sh–, though. You not even like that.”

Check out a clip from Juvenile’s interview below.

Cam’ron Sues J. Cole Over ‘Ready ’24’ Collab, Saying He Failed to Fulfill His End of the Deal

Trending on Billboard

Cam’ron has filed a lawsuit against J. Cole over the duo’s “Ready ’24” collaboration, which landed on Cole’s 2024 Might Delete Later mixtape.

According to court documents viewed by Billboard on Tuesday (Oct. 28), Cam’ron (Cameron Giles) sued his fellow rapper (Jermaine Cole) over allegedly violating the terms of an agreement pertaining to the track.

Related

Cam’ron claims that in exchange for his featured verse on the track, which was recorded in June 2022, Cole promised to join him on a separate song in the future or make an appearance on Cam’ron’s It Is What It Is sports talk show.

Per the court documents, Cam’ron alleges he asked Cole to hop on a pair of pre-recorded tracks in September 2022, but that Cole said he preferred they team up on a fresh song from scratch. But, he says, the collaboration never materialized.

Cam’ron claims he reached out to Cole again in July 2023 about joining him on It Is What It Is, and alleges Cole agreed to appear on the show at a later date.

The suit goes on to state that Cam’ron stayed in constant communication with Cole in the months leading up to Might Delete Later‘s release in April 2024, but that the Dreamville boss repeatedly relayed he was too busy to appear on the podcast.

Related

In addition to Cole, Universal Music Group (UMG) is listed as a defendant in the lawsuit. Cam’ron claims he hasn’t been compensated for the feature on “Ready ’24” and is seeking royalties and profits from the collaboration, an amount he estimates to be upwards of $500,000.

Representatives for Cole and UMG did not immediately return Billboard‘s requests for comment.

Produced by T-Minus, “Ready ’24” reached No. 38 on the Billboard Hot 100.

Billboard VIP Pass

Daily newsletters straight to your inbox


Sign Up