The Suno-Udio Lawsuits
Amid the rapidly-shifting sands at the intersection of AI and music — which involves a whole lot of accusations on both sides, endless questions of ethics, and dozens of companies vying for attention and a share of the market — no story came to define the situation quite like the three major labels teaming up to sue AI music generation companies Suno and Udio for $500 million, alleging copyright infringement on “an unimaginable scale.” Without clear legal precedent on whether it was “fair use” for Suno and Udio to train their algorithmic models on unlicensed music, the two seemed to be digging in for a long, establishment-setting fight — only for Universal, then Warner, to settle with Udio in October, followed by Warner’s settlement with Suno the following month.
The result is changes to some of the parameters around how such music can be utilized outside of the companies’ platforms. On Udio, users can no longer take their creations outside the platform’s walled garden, and for Suno, there will be limits for paid subscribers and remuneration for artists and songwriters who opt in to having their music licensed to the platforms. There is still a long road ahead (and Sony hasn’t settled either case), but some clarity is beginning to emerge around AI and music from a major-label legal perspective.
State Champ Radio 
